An electrophysiological signature of summed similarity in visual working memory.

Summed-similarity models of short-term item recognition posit that participants base their judgments of an item's prior occurrence on that item's summed similarity to the ensemble of items on the remembered list. We examined the neural predictions of these models in 3 short-term recognition memory experiments using electrocorticographic/depth electrode recordings and scalp electroencephalography. On each experimental trial, participants judged whether a test face had been among a small set of recently studied faces. Consistent with summed-similarity theory, participants' tendency to endorse a test item increased as a function of its summed similarity to the items on the just-studied list. To characterize this behavioral effect of summed similarity, we successfully fit a summed-similarity model to individual participant data from each experiment. Using the parameters determined from fitting the summed-similarity model to the behavioral data, we examined the relation between summed similarity and brain activity. We found that 4-9 Hz theta activity in the medial temporal lobe and 2-4 Hz delta activity recorded from frontal and parietal cortices increased with summed similarity. These findings demonstrate direct neural correlates of the similarity computations that form the foundation of several major cognitive theories of human recognition memory.

[1]  R. Shiffrin,et al.  A model for recognition memory: REM—retrieving effectively from memory , 1997, Psychonomic bulletin & review.

[2]  J. Fell,et al.  Phase/amplitude reset and theta–gamma interaction in the human medial temporal lobe during a continuous word recognition memory task , 2005, Hippocampus.

[3]  Geoffrey Karl Aguirre,et al.  Continuous carry-over designs for fMRI , 2007, NeuroImage.

[4]  R. Sekuler,et al.  Lure-similarity affects visual episodic recognition : Detailed tests of a noisy exemplar model , 2005 .

[5]  Gordon D. A. Brown,et al.  A temporal ratio model of memory. , 2007, Psychological review.

[6]  H. Wilson,et al.  fMRI evidence for the neural representation of faces , 2005, Nature Neuroscience.

[7]  E. Düzel,et al.  Induced theta oscillations mediate large‐scale synchrony with mediotemporal areas during recollection in humans , 2005, Hippocampus.

[8]  R. Sekuler,et al.  Intracranial electroencephalography reveals two distinct similarity effects during item recognition , 2009, Brain Research.

[9]  S. Monsell Recency, immediate recognition memory, and reaction time , 1978, Cognitive Psychology.

[10]  Michael J. Kahana,et al.  Foundations of Human Memory , 2012 .

[11]  Per B. Sederberg,et al.  PyEPL: A cross-platform experiment-programming library , 2007, Behavior research methods.

[12]  R. Nosofsky Tests of an exemplar model for relating perceptual classification and recognition memory. , 1991, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[13]  Brian Litt,et al.  Hippocampal gamma oscillations increase with working memory load , 2009 .

[14]  Douglas L. Hintzman,et al.  Judgments of frequency and recognition memory in a multiple-trace memory model. , 1988 .

[15]  R. Oostenveld,et al.  Nonparametric statistical testing of EEG- and MEG-data , 2007, Journal of Neuroscience Methods.

[16]  Jeremy R. Manning,et al.  Spontaneously Reactivated Patterns in Frontal and Temporal Lobe Predict Semantic Clustering during Memory Search , 2012, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[17]  Tim Curran,et al.  EEG oscillations and recognition memory: Theta correlates of memory retrieval and decision making , 2006, NeuroImage.

[18]  Forrest W. Young,et al.  Nonmetric individual differences multidimensional scaling: An alternating least squares method with optimal scaling features , 1977 .

[19]  M. Kahana,et al.  Classification and perceived similarity of compound gratings that differ in relative spatial phase , 1994, Perception & psychophysics.

[20]  W. G. Workman,et al.  Suggestions for Simplifying the Computation of Vincent Curves , 1950 .

[21]  M. Kahana,et al.  Similarity effects in name-face recognition : A dual-process , summed-similarity account , 2012 .

[22]  Michael J Kahana,et al.  Auditory Short-Term Memory Behaves Like Visual Short-Term Memory , 2007, PLoS biology.

[23]  Marc W Howard,et al.  Gamma oscillations correlate with working memory load in humans. , 2003, Cerebral cortex.

[24]  Gunter Loffler,et al.  Synthetic faces, face cubes, and the geometry of face space , 2002, Vision Research.

[25]  Daniel R. Little,et al.  Logical-rule models of classification response times: a synthesis of mental-architecture, random-walk, and decision-bound approaches. , 2010, Psychological review.

[26]  Daniel R. Little,et al.  Activation in the neural network responsible for categorization and recognition reflects parameter changes , 2011, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[27]  W. Heiser,et al.  Triadic Distance Models: Axiomatization and Least Squares Representation , 1997, Journal of mathematical psychology.

[28]  M. Kahana,et al.  Human hippocampal theta oscillations and the formation of episodic memories , 2012, Hippocampus.

[29]  Evan Heit,et al.  Feature-sampling and random-walk models of individual-stimulus recognition. , 2003, Journal of experimental psychology. General.

[30]  R. Shepard,et al.  Toward a universal law of generalization for psychological science. , 1987, Science.

[31]  R. Nosofsky,et al.  Exemplar similarity, study list homogeneity, and short-term perceptual recognition , 2006, Memory & cognition.

[32]  M. Rugg,et al.  Human recognition memory: a cognitive neuroscience perspective , 2003, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[33]  Michael J. Kahana,et al.  Direct brain recordings fuel advances in cognitive electrophysiology , 2010, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[34]  H. Wilson,et al.  Recognition memory for realistic synthetic faces , 2007, Memory & cognition.

[35]  Keiji Tanaka,et al.  Matching Categorical Object Representations in Inferior Temporal Cortex of Man and Monkey , 2008, Neuron.

[36]  H. Heinze,et al.  The oscillatory dynamics of recognition memory and its relationship to event-related responses. , 2005, Cerebral cortex.

[37]  Alison Harris,et al.  Neural Tuning for Face Wholes and Parts in Human Fusiform Gyrus Revealed by fMRI 3 Adaptation 4 5 , 2010 .

[38]  Daniel R. Little,et al.  Short-term memory scanning viewed as exemplar-based categorization. , 2011, Psychological review.

[39]  Y. Benjamini,et al.  Controlling the false discovery rate: a practical and powerful approach to multiple testing , 1995 .

[40]  Alumit Ishai,et al.  Recognition memory is modulated by visual similarity , 2006, NeuroImage.

[41]  R. Sekuler,et al.  Recognizing spatial patterns: a noisy exemplar approach , 2002, Vision Research.