Process Modeling Leveraged by Workflow Structure and Running Logs Analysis

The reality of big data opens up a new world for business process modeling. Omnipresent cases and workflow logs are getting accessible, which implies the chance to exploit important patterns hidden in them so as to cut down the modeling cost or to improve the quality of process models. To take the full advantage of big data in process-aware systems (PASs), we propose a novel business process modeling technique that leverages the modeling by cases and workflow logs analysis. It uses the average perceptron to analyze both of existing process structure of cases and co-occurrence relation of activities in workflow logs. In contrast to traditional manual efforts, it improves the performance significantly by recommending proved working patterns. Comparing to recent process mining strategies, it serves the modeling online with meaningful process segments. We evaluate our approach against a synthesis dataset (100 processes and 10,000 log items generated by the plugin PLG in ProM) and real data from public business processes (77 processes in the package Paul Fisher workflows for benchmarks PR and CA2 from the website myExperiment). The study reveals that 9.46 % improvement in precision can be gained by considering both case structure and log items in contrast to the structure only, or 5.94 % gaining in contrast to mere logs. Our evaluation validates the effectiveness of the proposed technique and efficiency when we applying it on real modeling scenarios.

[1]  Samir Tata,et al.  Context-Based Service Recommendation for Assisting Business Process Design , 2011, EC-Web.

[2]  Jianmin Wang,et al.  Detecting Implicit Dependencies Between Tasks from Event Logs , 2006, APWeb.

[3]  Qing Liu,et al.  FlowRecommender: A Workflow Recommendation Technique for Process Provenance , 2009, AusDM.

[4]  Alessandro Sperduti,et al.  PLG: A Framework for the Generation of Business Process Models and Their Execution Logs , 2010, Business Process Management Workshops.

[5]  Remco M. Dijkman,et al.  Similarity of business process models: Metrics and evaluation , 2011, Inf. Syst..

[6]  Ngoc Chan Nguyen SERVICE RECOMMENDATION FOR INDIVIDUAL AND PROCESS USE , 2012 .

[7]  Koby Crammer,et al.  Online Passive-Aggressive Algorithms , 2003, J. Mach. Learn. Res..

[8]  Tao Jin,et al.  Efficient Retrieval of Similar Business Process Models Based on Structure - (Short Paper) , 2011, OTM Conferences.

[9]  Wil M. P. van der Aalst,et al.  Mining Social Networks: Uncovering Interaction Patterns in Business Processes , 2004, Business Process Management.

[10]  Jianwei Yin,et al.  A Near Neighbour and Maximal Subgraph First Based Business Process Recommendation Technique: A Near Neighbour and Maximal Subgraph First Based Business Process Recommendation Technique , 2014 .

[11]  Paul W. P. J. Grefen,et al.  Fast Business Process Similarity Search with Feature-Based Similarity Estimation , 2010, OTM Conferences.

[12]  Jianmin Wang,et al.  A workflow net similarity measure based on transition adjacency relations , 2010, Comput. Ind..

[13]  Remco M. Dijkman,et al.  The ICoP Framework: Identification of Correspondences between Process Models , 2010, CAiSE.

[14]  Wil M. P. van der Aalst,et al.  Workflow mining: discovering process models from event logs , 2004, IEEE Transactions on Knowledge and Data Engineering.

[15]  Fabio Casati,et al.  Recommendation and Weaving of Reusable Mashup Model Patterns for Assisted Development , 2014, TOIT.