Computational Design of Morphing Wing Structures through Multiple-Stage Optimization Process

This investigation introduces a novel optimization approach for conceptual design of a distributed actuation system that is capable of achieving radical structural shape changes, specifically applicable to morphing air vehicles. The topology and dimensional design process is implemented in two-stages: The actuation system layout is first determined through a multi-disciplinary topology optimization process and, then, the thickness or crosssectional area of each existent member is optimized under aerodynamics pressure and actuation loads. The previous investigation by the authors demonstrated the potential capabilities of a topology optimization methodology for determination of distributed actuation systems for a morphing wing structure without dimensional considerations. The primary objective of the present investigation, therefore, is to introduce the new methodology and processes to address the sizing issues. The investigation includes the formulation of appropriate optimization problems, solution sequence, and development of effective modeling concepts. Sample problems are solved to demonstrate the potential capabilities of the presented methodology.

[1]  Gregory N. Washington,et al.  Energy based efficiency of adaptive structure systems , 2006 .

[2]  Mary Frecker,et al.  Topological synthesis of compliant mechanisms using multi-criteria optimization , 1997 .

[3]  Mary Frecker,et al.  Aircraft Structural Morphing Using Tendon-Actuated Compliant Cellular Trusses , 2005 .

[4]  Mary Frecker,et al.  Recent Advances in Optimization of Smart Structures and Actuators , 2003 .

[5]  K. Svanberg The method of moving asymptotes—a new method for structural optimization , 1987 .

[6]  Kurt Maute,et al.  Integrated Multidisciplinary Topology Optimization Approach to Adaptive Wing Design , 2006 .

[7]  John E. Renaud,et al.  Multilevel Variable Fidelity Optimization of a Morphing Unmanned Aerial Vehicle , 2004 .

[8]  Gareth J. Knowles,et al.  Static shape control for adaptive wings , 1994 .

[9]  William A. Crossley,et al.  Genetic Algorithm approaches to smart actuator placement for aircraft flight control , 2000 .

[10]  Sridhar Kota,et al.  Design of Compliant Mechanisms for Morphing Structural Shapes , 2003 .

[11]  Sridhar Kota,et al.  Design of Adaptive and Controllable Compliant Systems With Embedded Actuators and Sensors , 2009 .

[12]  Brian Sanders,et al.  Conceptual design and multidisciplinary optimization of in-plane morphing wing structures , 2006, SPIE Smart Structures and Materials + Nondestructive Evaluation and Health Monitoring.

[13]  Anupam Saxena,et al.  Topology design of large displacement compliant mechanisms with multiple materials and multiple output ports , 2005 .

[14]  Sridhar Kota,et al.  An Energy Formulation for Parametric Size and Shape Optimization of Compliant Mechanisms , 1999 .

[15]  S. Kota,et al.  An Effective Method of Synthesizing Compliant Adaptive Structures using Load Path Representation , 2005 .

[16]  Ole Sigmund,et al.  Topology synthesis of large‐displacement compliant mechanisms , 2001 .

[17]  Mary Frecker,et al.  Optimal structural design of a morphing aircraft wing using parallel non-dominated sorting genetic algorithm II (NSGA II) , 2006, SPIE Smart Structures and Materials + Nondestructive Evaluation and Health Monitoring.

[18]  Mary Frecker,et al.  Optimal actuator location within a morphing wing scissor mechanism configuration , 2006, SPIE Smart Structures and Materials + Nondestructive Evaluation and Health Monitoring.

[19]  T. Buhl Simultaneous topology optimization of structure and supports , 2002 .

[20]  Sridhar Kota,et al.  Synthesis of Adaptive and Controllable Compliant Systems With Embedded Actuators and Sensors , 2006 .