Medulloblastoma comprises four distinct molecular variants.

PURPOSE Recent genomic approaches have suggested the existence of multiple distinct subtypes of medulloblastoma. We studied a large cohort of medulloblastomas to determine how many subgroups of the disease exist, how they differ, and the extent of overlap between subgroups. METHODS We determined gene expression profiles and DNA copy number aberrations for 103 primary medulloblastomas. Bioinformatic tools were used for class discovery of medulloblastoma subgroups based on the most informative genes in the data set. Immunohistochemistry for subgroup-specific signature genes was used to determine subgroup affiliation for 294 nonoverlapping medulloblastomas on two independent tissue microarrays. RESULTS Multiple unsupervised analyses of transcriptional profiles identified the following four distinct, nonoverlapping molecular variants: WNT, SHH, group C, and group D. Supervised analysis of these four subgroups revealed significant subgroup-specific demographics, histology, metastatic status, and DNA copy number aberrations. Immunohistochemistry for DKK1 (WNT), SFRP1 (SHH), NPR3 (group C), and KCNA1 (group D) could reliably and uniquely classify formalin-fixed medulloblastomas in approximately 98% of patients. Group C patients (NPR3-positive tumors) exhibited a significantly diminished progression-free and overall survival irrespective of their metastatic status. CONCLUSION Our integrative genomics approach to a large cohort of medulloblastomas has identified four disparate subgroups with distinct demographics, clinical presentation, transcriptional profiles, genetic abnormalities, and clinical outcome. Medulloblastomas can be reliably assigned to subgroups through immunohistochemistry, thereby making medulloblastoma subclassification widely available. Future research on medulloblastoma and the development of clinical trials should take into consideration these four distinct types of medulloblastoma.

[1]  Roger E. Taylor,et al.  Nodule Formation and Desmoplasia in Medulloblastomas—Defining the Nodular/Desmoplastic Variant and Its Biological Behavior , 2007, Brain pathology.

[2]  E. Lander,et al.  Assessing the significance of chromosomal aberrations in cancer: Methodology and application to glioma , 2007, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[3]  F. Berthold,et al.  Treatment of early childhood medulloblastoma by postoperative chemotherapy and deferred radiotherapy. , 2009, Neuro-oncology.

[4]  Kristin L. Sainani,et al.  Gender affects survival for medulloblastoma only in older children and adults: A study from the surveillance epidemiology and end results registry , 2009, Pediatric blood & cancer.

[5]  R. McLendon,et al.  Identification of OTX2 as a medulloblastoma oncogene whose product can be targeted by all-trans retinoic acid. , 2005, Cancer research.

[6]  U. Tabori,et al.  Distinctive clinical course and pattern of relapse in adolescents with medulloblastoma. , 2006, International Journal of Radiation Oncology, Biology, Physics.

[7]  Axel Benner,et al.  Outcome prediction in pediatric medulloblastoma based on DNA copy-number aberrations of chromosomes 6q and 17q and the MYC and MYCN loci. , 2009, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[8]  Jill P. Mesirov,et al.  Subclass Mapping: Identifying Common Subtypes in Independent Disease Data Sets , 2007, PloS one.

[9]  J. Trojanowski,et al.  TrkC expression predicts good clinical outcome in primitive neuroectodermal brain tumors. , 2000, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[10]  K. Shah,et al.  Increased p53 immunopositivity in anaplastic medulloblastoma and supratentorial PNET is not caused by JC virus , 2005, BMC Cancer.

[11]  G. Rao The miR-17/92 Polycistron Is Up-regulated in Sonic Hedgehog–Driven Medulloblastomas and Induced by N-myc in Sonic Hedgehog–Treated Cerebellar Neural Precursors , 2010 .

[12]  F. Kokocinski,et al.  Microarray-based screening for molecular markers in medulloblastoma revealed STK15 as independent predictor for survival. , 2004, Cancer research.

[13]  M. Daly,et al.  PGC-1α-responsive genes involved in oxidative phosphorylation are coordinately downregulated in human diabetes , 2003, Nature Genetics.

[14]  Pablo Tamayo,et al.  Metagenes and molecular pattern discovery using matrix factorization , 2004, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[15]  R H Perry,et al.  Prognostic significance of HER2 and HER4 coexpression in childhood medulloblastoma. , 1997, Cancer research.

[16]  M. Chintagumpala,et al.  FOXG1 dysregulation is a frequent event in medulloblastoma , 2007, Journal of Neuro-Oncology.

[17]  J. Biegel,et al.  Isochromosome 17q Is a Negative Prognostic Factor in Poor-Risk Childhood Medulloblastoma Patients , 2005, Clinical Cancer Research.

[18]  J. Rutka,et al.  A Clinicobiological Model Predicting Survival in Medulloblastoma , 2004, Clinical Cancer Research.

[19]  J. Biegel,et al.  Immunohistochemical Analysis of hSNF5/INI1 in Pediatric CNS Neoplasms , 2004, The American journal of surgical pathology.

[20]  R. Tibshirani,et al.  Diagnosis of multiple cancer types by shrunken centroids of gene expression , 2002, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[21]  Claire L Weston,et al.  beta-Catenin status predicts a favorable outcome in childhood medulloblastoma: the United Kingdom Children's Cancer Study Group Brain Tumour Committee. , 2005, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[22]  Pablo Tamayo,et al.  Gene set enrichment analysis: A knowledge-based approach for interpreting genome-wide expression profiles , 2005, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[23]  T. Merchant,et al.  Risk-adapted craniospinal radiotherapy followed by high-dose chemotherapy and stem-cell rescue in children with newly diagnosed medulloblastoma (St Jude Medulloblastoma-96): long-term results from a prospective, multicentre trial. , 2006, The Lancet. Oncology.

[24]  Emmanuel Barillot,et al.  Beta‐catenin status in paediatric medulloblastomas: correlation of immunohistochemical expression with mutational status, genetic profiles, and clinical characteristics , 2009, The Journal of pathology.

[25]  G. Riggins,et al.  Genomic amplification of orthodenticle homologue 2 in medulloblastomas. , 2005, Cancer research.

[26]  J. Crolla,et al.  Clinical and molecular stratification of disease risk in medulloblastoma , 2001, British Journal of Cancer.

[27]  L. Rorke,et al.  MYC messenger RNA expression predicts survival outcome in childhood primitive neuroectodermal tumor/medulloblastoma. , 2001, Clinical cancer research : an official journal of the American Association for Cancer Research.

[28]  J. Biegel,et al.  Germ-line and acquired mutations of INI1 in atypical teratoid and rhabdoid tumors. , 1999, Cancer research.

[29]  D. Ellison,et al.  Wnt/Wingless Pathway Activation and Chromosome 6 Loss Characterise a Distinct Molecular Sub-Group of Medulloblastomas Associated with a Favourable Prognosis , 2006, Cell cycle.

[30]  T. Curran,et al.  Genomics identifies medulloblastoma subgroups that are enriched for specific genetic alterations. , 2006, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[31]  Paul A. Northcott,et al.  Multiple recurrent genetic events converge on control of histone lysine methylation in medulloblastoma , 2009, Nature Genetics.

[32]  Amar Gajjar,et al.  Clinical, histopathologic, and molecular markers of prognosis: toward a new disease risk stratification system for medulloblastoma. , 2004, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[33]  Dirk Troost,et al.  Integrated Genomics Identifies Five Medulloblastoma Subtypes with Distinct Genetic Profiles, Pathway Signatures and Clinicopathological Features , 2008, PloS one.

[34]  T. Poggio,et al.  Prediction of central nervous system embryonal tumour outcome based on gene expression , 2002, Nature.