The Goals and Promise of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act

The primary goal of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act was to fix auditing of U.S. public companies, consistent with its full, official name: the Public Company Accounting Reform and Investor Protection Act of 2002. By consensus, auditing had been working poorly, and increasingly so. The most important, and most promising, part of Sarbanes-Oxley was the creation of a unique, quasi-public institution to oversee and regulate auditing, the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (PCAOB). In controversial section 404, the law also created new disclosure-based incentives for firms to spend money on internal controls, above increases that would have occurred after the corporate scandals of the early 2000s. In exchange for these higher costs, which have already fallen substantially, Sarbanes-Oxley promises a variety of long-term benefits. Investors will face a lower risk of losses from fraud and theft, and benefit from more reliable financial reporting, greater transparency, and accountability. Public companies will pay a lower cost of capital, and the economy will benefit because of a better allocation of resources and faster growth. Sarbanes-Oxley remains a work in progress -- section 404 in particular was implemented too aggressively - but reformers should push for continued improvements in its implementation, by PCAOB, rather than for repeal of the legislation itself.

[1]  S. Balsam,et al.  The effect of Enron, Andersen, and Sarbanes-Oxley on the US market for audit services , 2009 .

[2]  Donna M. Nagy Playing Peekaboo with Constitutional Law: The PCAOB and its Public/Private Status , 2009 .

[3]  P. Mahoney The Development of Securities Law in the United States , 2009 .

[4]  I. J. C. Coates The Keynote Papers and the Current Financial Crisis , 2009 .

[5]  R. Ball Market and Political/Regulatory Perspectives on the Recent Accounting Scandals , 2009 .

[6]  C. Leuz,et al.  Cost of Capital Effects and Changes in Growth Expectations Around U.S. Cross-Listings , 2008 .

[7]  Kate Litvak The Long-Term Effect of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act on Cross-Listing Premia , 2008 .

[8]  Feng Gao,et al.  Unintended Consequences of Granting Small Firms Exemptions from Securities Regulation: Evidence from the Sarbanes-Oxley Act , 2008 .

[9]  Zabihollah Rezaee,et al.  The Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and Market Liquidity , 2008 .

[10]  T. Jenkinson,et al.  Does One Size Fit All? The Consequences of Switching Markets with Different Regulatory Standards , 2008 .

[11]  James S. Linck,et al.  The Effects and Unintended Consequences of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act on the Supply and Demand for Directors , 2008 .

[12]  Joseph D. Piotroski,et al.  Regulation and Bonding: The Sarbanes-Oxley Act and the Flow of International Listings , 2008 .

[13]  E. Talley,et al.  Going-Private Decisions and the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002: A Cross-Country Analysis , 2007 .

[14]  Luigi Zingales Is the U.S. Capital Market Losing its Competitive Edge? , 2007 .

[15]  G. Mertens,et al.  The Impact of Media Attention on the Use of Alternative Earnings Measures , 2007 .

[16]  Leslie D. Hodder,et al.  Internal Control Weaknesses and Information Uncertainty , 2007 .

[17]  C. Leuz,et al.  Was the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 Really this Costly? A Discussion of Evidence from Event Returns and Going-Private Decisions , 2007 .

[18]  Kate Litvak The Effect of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act on Non-US Companies Cross-Listed in the US , 2007 .

[19]  Gary F. Peters,et al.  Corporate Governance, Audit Quality and the Sarbanes-Oxley Act: Evidence from Internal Audit Outsourcing , 2007 .

[20]  I. Dyck,et al.  Who Blows the Whistle on Corporate Fraud? , 2007 .

[21]  I. Zhang Economic Consequences of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 , 2007 .

[22]  Paola Sapienza,et al.  A Lobbying Approach to Evaluating the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 , 2007 .

[23]  Jacqueline S. Hammersley,et al.  Market reactions to the disclosure of internal control weaknesses and to the characteristics of those weaknesses under section 302 of the Sarbanes Oxley Act of 2002 , 2007 .

[24]  Nadia Massoud,et al.  Why Do Firms Go Dark? , 2004, Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis.

[25]  John McGregor Form over Substance , 2007, J. Object Technol..

[26]  Anwer S. Ahmed,et al.  The Sarbanes Oxley Act, Auditor Independence and Accounting Accruals: An Empirical Analysis , 2006 .

[27]  Morton Pincus,et al.  Market Reaction to Events Surrounding the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and Earnings Management , 2006 .

[28]  Trends and Determinants of Market Liquidity in the Pre- and Post-Sarbanes-Oxley Act Periods , 2006 .

[29]  Zabihollah Rezaee,et al.  The Sarbanes‐Oxley Act of 2002 and Capital‐Market Behavior: Early Evidence* , 2006 .

[30]  Lisa M. Fairfax Form Over Substance?: Officer Certification and the Promise of Enhanced Personal Accountability Under the Sarbanes-Oxley Act , 2006 .

[31]  John C. Coffee,et al.  Gatekeepers: The Professions and Corporate Governance , 2006 .

[32]  Larry E. Ribstein,et al.  The Sarbanes-Oxley Debacle: What We've Learned; How to Fix it , 2006 .

[33]  Vidhi Chhaochharia,et al.  Corporate Governance and Firm Value: the Impact of the 2002 Governance Rules , 2007 .

[34]  R. Clark Corporate Governance Changes in the Wake of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act: A Morality Tale for Policymakers Too , 2005 .

[35]  Michael L. Ettredge,et al.  The Impact of Internal Control Quality on Audit Delay in the Sox Era , 2005 .

[36]  Donald C. Langevoort Internal Controls After Sarbanes-Oxley: Revisiting Corporate Law's Duty of Care as Responsibility for Systems , 2005 .

[37]  H. Jackson Variation in the Intensity of Financial Regulation: Preliminary Evidence and Potential Implications , 2005 .

[38]  Kam C. Chan,et al.  Earnings Management and Return-Earnings Association of Firms Reporting Material Internal Control Weaknesses Under Section 404 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act , 2005 .

[39]  Susan W. Eldridge,et al.  SOX Costs: Auditor Attestation under Section 404 , 2005 .

[40]  Zabihollah Rezaee,et al.  The Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and Security Market Behavior: Early Evidence , 2005 .

[41]  Yuyan Guan,et al.  The Wealth Change and Redistribution Effects of Sarbanes-Oxley Internal Control Disclosures , 2005 .

[42]  Bowman,et al.  The Failure of the Federal Sentencing Guidelines: A Structural Analysis , 2005 .

[43]  Gilles Hilary,et al.  The Credibility of Self-Regulation: Evidence from the Accounting Profession's Peer Review Program , 2005 .

[44]  Steven B. Lilien,et al.  Characteristics of Firms with Material Weaknesses in Internal Control: An Assessment of Section 404 of Sarbanes Oxley , 2005 .

[45]  P. Griffin,et al.  The Effects of Auditor Dismissals and Resignations on Audit Fees: Evidence Based on SEC Disclosures Under Sarbanes-Oxley , 2005 .

[46]  W. Carney The Costs of Being Public after Sarbanes-Oxley: The Irony of 'Going Private' , 2005 .

[47]  D. Cohen,et al.  Trends in Earnings Management and Informativeness of Earnings Announcements in the Pre-and Post-sarbanes Oxley Periods Trends in Earnings Management and Informativeness of Earnings Announcements in the Pre-and Post-sarbanes Oxley Periods , 2022 .

[48]  James S. Linck,et al.  Effects and Unintended Consequences of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act on Corporate Boards , 2005 .

[49]  M. Wong,et al.  The Impact of Sarbanes-Oxley on Cross-listed Companies* , 2005 .

[50]  Alexander J. Triantis,et al.  Why Do Firms Go Dark? Causes and Economic Consequences of Voluntary SEC Deregistrations , 2008 .

[51]  Stanley B. Block The Latest Movement to Going Private: An Empirical Study , 2005 .

[52]  R. Romano,et al.  The Sarbanes-Oxley Act and the Making of Quack Corporate Governance , 2004 .

[53]  S. Fawcett,et al.  Initial Public Offerings: An Analysis of Theory and Practice , 2004 .

[54]  K. F. Brickey Enron's Legacy , 2004 .

[55]  Rachel M. Hayes,et al.  The Sarbanes-Oxley Act and Firms' Going-Private Decisions , 2004 .

[56]  P. C. Hsu Going Private - A Response to an Increased Regulatory Burden? , 2004 .

[57]  Luigi Zingales The Costs and Benefits of Financial Market Regulation , 2004 .

[58]  Brian J. Bushee,et al.  Economic Consequences of Sec Disclosure Regulation: Evidence from the OTC Bulletin Board , 2004 .

[59]  M. Pagano,et al.  Where is the Market? Evidence from Cross-Listings , 2004 .

[60]  S. Balsam,et al.  The Effect of Enron, Andersen, and Sarbanes-Oxley on the Market for Audit Services , 2004 .

[61]  W. Bratton,et al.  Enron, Sarbanes-Oxley and Accounting: Rules Versus Principles Versus Rents , 2003 .

[62]  P. Healy,et al.  How the Quest for Efficiency Undermined the Market , 2003 .

[63]  S. Kaplan,et al.  The State of U.S. Corporate Governance: What's Right and What's Wrong? , 2003 .

[64]  Alan D. Jagolinzer,et al.  Economic Consequences of SEC Disclosure Regulation , 2003 .

[65]  Lawrence A. Cunningham,et al.  The Sarbanes-Oxley Yawn: Heavy Rhetoric, Light Reform (And It Might Just Work). Presentation at Conference: "Crisis in Confidence: Corporate Governance and Professional Ethics Post-Enron" at the University of Connecticut Law and Business Schools. , 2002 .

[66]  Michael Perino Enron's Legislative Aftermath: Some Reflections on the Deterrence Aspects of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 , 2002 .

[67]  Campbell R. Harvey,et al.  How Do Cfos Make Capital Budgeting and Capital Structure Decisions? , 2002 .

[68]  William J. Stuntz The Pathological Politics of Criminal Law , 2001 .

[69]  Edward L. Glaeser,et al.  Coase Versus the Coasians , 2001 .

[70]  I. J. C. Coates Fair Value As An Avoidable Rule of Corporate Law: Minority Discounts in Conflict Transactions , 1999 .

[71]  Anat R. Admati,et al.  Forcing Firms to Talk: Financial Disclosure Regulation and Externalities , 1998 .

[72]  J. GenéBadía On the Market , 1993, Nature Medicine.

[73]  Stephen Choi Market Lessons for Gatekeepers , 1997 .

[74]  J. Gené Badia [Where is the market?]. , 1993, Atencion primaria.

[75]  R. Romano The Shareholder Suit: Litigation without Foundation? , 1991 .

[76]  G. Miller,et al.  The Plaintiffs' Attorney's Role in Class Action and Derivative Litigation: Economic Analysis and Recommendations for Reform , 1991 .

[77]  Fragmenting the Unitary Executive: Congressional Delegations of Administrative Authority Outside the Federal Government , 1990 .

[78]  James F. Wilson Bureaucracy: What Government Agencies Do and Why They Do It , 1990 .

[79]  Jeremy C. Stein,et al.  Efficient Capital Markets, Inefficient Firms: A Model of Myopic Corporate Behavior , 1989 .

[80]  Steven Shavell,et al.  The Judgment Proof Problem , 1986 .

[81]  Reinier H. Kraakman Gatekeepers: The Anatomy of a Third-Party Enforcement Strategy , 1986 .

[82]  N Fincancioglu Carrots and sticks. , 1982 .

[83]  Jens Kattge,et al.  Carrots and sticks. , 2014, Newsweek.

[84]  M. Ivimey Annual report , 1958, IRE Transactions on Engineering Writing and Speech.