Reconsidering sustainable building and design: lessons from China, Germany and Australia

This paper reports on the initial stages of a research project entitled „Reconsidering Sustainable Building and Design: A Cultural Change Approach‟, which is being conducted at the University of South Australia in Adelaide. The project is a three year, Australian Research Council funded endeavour, which seeks to take a whole of life cycle approach to the implementation of ecologically sustainable approaches in building design and construction. The project involves ten partners from government and industry, including partners in Shenzhen University in China and Karlsruhe Institute of Technology in Germany. As such the project is well positioned to take a cross-cultural approach to the analysis of issues associated with the implementation of sustainable building and design practices. This paper reports on the initial phases of the project which included an extensive literature review comparing construction waste management practices in the three study areas: Shenzhen, China; Karlsruhe, Germany; and Adelaide, Australia. The paper begins to explore issues such as the cultural, political, legislative and economic factors which influence the implementation of ecologically sustainable building and design practices, before making some initial recommendations in terms of what can be learnt from the different study regions in order to improve ecologically sustainable outcomes.

[1]  L. Brookes The greenhouse effect: the fallacies in the energy efficiency solution , 1990 .

[2]  Kaixun Sha,et al.  Sustainable construction in China: status quo and trends , 2000 .

[3]  Gregor P. Henze,et al.  Survey of Sustainable Building Design Practices in North America, Europe, and Asia , 2006 .

[4]  R. Almond,et al.  Living Planet Report 2010: Biodiversity, biocapacity and development , 2010 .

[5]  Jutta Gutberlet,et al.  Recovering Resources - Recycling Citizenship: Urban Poverty Reduction in Latin America , 2008 .

[6]  Niklaus Kohler,et al.  Cultural Issues for a Sustainable Built Environment , 2008 .

[7]  Shaopeng Wu,et al.  Utilization of recycled brick powder as alternative filler in asphalt mixture , 2011 .

[8]  Jerry Yudelson,et al.  Green Building Trends: Europe , 2009 .

[9]  R. Garnaut,et al.  The Garnaut Climate Change Review: final report. , 2008 .

[10]  Weisheng Lu,et al.  Critical success factors for on-site sorting of construction waste: A china study , 2010 .

[11]  Jiayuan Wang,et al.  Major obstacles to improving the performance of waste management in China's construction industry , 2011 .

[12]  Debra Lam The reality of environmental sustainability in China 1 , 2008 .

[13]  Gene Bazan Our Ecological Footprint: Reducing Human Impact on the Earth , 1997 .

[14]  Steffen Lehmann,et al.  Designing for Zero Waste : Consumption, Technologies and the Built Environment , 2012 .

[15]  W. Rees The ecological crisis and self-delusion: implications for the building sector , 2009 .

[16]  Frank Schultmann,et al.  Energy-oriented deconstruction and recovery planning , 2007 .

[17]  Wei Yang,et al.  Simulation of the evolution of the Chinese building and infrastructure stock , 2008 .

[19]  Weisheng Lu,et al.  An empirical investigation of construction and demolition waste generation rates in Shenzhen city, South China. , 2011, Waste management.

[20]  S. Zeng,et al.  The drivers for contractors' green innovation: an industry perspective , 2010 .

[21]  When a billion Chinese jump , 2010 .

[22]  Vivian W. Y Tam,et al.  An investigation of construction wastes: an empirical study in Shenzhen , 2008 .

[23]  A. Giddens The Politics of Climate Change , 2009 .

[24]  R. Garnaut The Garnaut Review 2011: Australia in the Global Response to Climate Change , 2011 .