The VED meter — a new tool to measure the ventricular conduction abnormalities in heart failure patients

Heart failure patients with a left ventricular ejection fraction below or equal to 35%, QRS duration above 150 ms, and left bundle branch block (LBBB) are usually recommended for treatment with a cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) device. Yet, about one-third of these patients do not respond to CRT revealing the limit of the current patient management guidelines. For this reason, new methods for assessing the level of electrical ventricular delay (VED) are being explored. In this work, we present the VED Meter, autonomous software measuring the level of electrical activation delay from the standard body-surface electrocardiogram (ECG). The software delivers the VED parameter expressed in ms that reflects the electrical dyssynchrony between the right ventricle, septum and left ventricle lateral wall. We applied this software to the data from the MADIT-CRT trial to evaluate the VED values in three types of ventricular conduction disturbances: LBBB, right bundle branch block (RBBB), and intra-ventricular conduction disturbances (IVCD). We report that VED parameter has negative values for RBBB (delayed activation of the septum and the right ventricle) and positive for LBBB (delayed activation of the left ventricle lateral wall) which were significantly different at p<0.001.

[1]  Wojciech Zareba,et al.  Multicenter Automatic Defibrillator Implantation Trial–Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy (MADIT‐CRT): Design and Clinical Protocol , 2005, Annals of noninvasive electrocardiology : the official journal of the International Society for Holter and Noninvasive Electrocardiology, Inc.

[2]  Niraj Varma,et al.  Differential response to cardiac resynchronization therapy and clinical outcomes according to QRS morphology and QRS duration. , 2012, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[3]  Fabio Badilini,et al.  The ISHNE Holter Standard Output File Format , 1998 .

[4]  F Plesinger,et al.  SignalPlant: an open signal processing software platform , 2016, Physiological measurement.

[5]  P. Tchou,et al.  Probability and magnitude of response to cardiac resynchronization therapy according to QRS duration and gender in nonischemic cardiomyopathy and LBBB. , 2014, Heart rhythm.

[6]  Petr Klimes,et al.  Ventricular dyssynchrony assessment using ultra-high frequency ECG technique , 2017, Journal of Interventional Cardiac Electrophysiology.

[7]  Pavel Jurák,et al.  An additional marker of ventricular dyssynchrony , 2015, 2015 Computing in Cardiology Conference (CinC).