Dynamic aspects of stimulus-response correspondence: evidence for two mechanisms involved in the Simon effect.

It has been recently proposed that the time course of the Simon effect may vary across tasks, which might reflect different types of stimulus-response (S-R) transmissions (E. Wascher, U. Schatz, T. Kuder, & R. Verleger, 2001). The authors tested this notion in 4 experiments by comparing Simon effects evoked by horizontal and vertical S-R arrangements. The temporal properties of the effect, as well as lateralized readiness potential-difference waves, indicated a fast and transient influence of the horizontal, but a slow and sustained influence of the vertical spatial stimulus feature on performance. Additional evidence for this temporal dissociation was obtained in experiments that induced a shortening or lengthening of the mean response time. Thus, the data strongly indicate that there are 2 temporally dissociable mechanisms involved in generating the Simon effect for horizontal and vertical S-R relations.

[1]  C. Umilta,et al.  Right-left prevalence in spatial compatibility , 1984, Perception & psychophysics.

[2]  G. Kerr,et al.  Proprioception and Stimulus-Response Compatibility , 2000, The Quarterly journal of experimental psychology. A, Human experimental psychology.

[3]  J. Danckert Common Mechanisms in Perception and Action: Attention and Performance XIX Wolfgang Prinz, Bernhard Hommel (Eds.), Oxford University Press, 2002, Price: £ 65.00, ISBN: 0-19-851069 , 2003, Neuropsychologia.

[4]  W. Hockley Analysis of response time distributions in the study of cognitive processes. , 1984 .

[5]  U. Ansorge Influences of response-activating stimuli and passage of time on the Simon effect , 2003, Psychological research.

[6]  M. Redondo,et al.  On the automaticity of ipsilateral response activation in the Simon effect. , 1998, Psychophysiology.

[7]  J. R. Simon,et al.  Auditory S-R compatibility: the effect of an irrelevant cue on information processing. , 1967, The Journal of applied psychology.

[8]  E. Lauber,et al.  Conditional and unconditional automaticity: a dual-process model of effects of spatial stimulus-response correspondence. , 1994, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[9]  Robert W. Proctor,et al.  The role of instructions, practice, and stimulus-hand correspondence on the Simon effect , 2003, Psychological research.

[10]  R. Wallace,et al.  S-R compatibility and the idea of a response code. , 1971, Journal of experimental psychology.

[11]  A van Oosterom,et al.  Overlap of attention and movement-related activity in lateralized event-related brain potentials , 2001, Clinical Neurophysiology.

[12]  G. d'Ydewalle,et al.  Effects of multiple reference points in spatial stimulus-response compatibility. , 1992, Acta psychologica.

[13]  Daniela Mapelli,et al.  Automatic spatial coding of perceived gaze direction is revealed by the Simon effect , 2003, Psychonomic bulletin & review.

[14]  Peter Schroeder-Heister,et al.  Spatial Coding and Spatio-Anatomical Mapping: Evidence for a Hierarchical Model of Spatial Stimulus-Response Compatibility , 1990 .

[15]  S. Klapp,et al.  Anatomic and environmental dimensions of stimulus-response compatibility: implication for theories of memory coding. , 1979, Acta psychologica.

[16]  B. Hommel The relationship between stimulus processing and response selection in the Simon task: Evidence for a temporal overlap , 1993 .

[17]  R. Ratcliff Group reaction time distributions and an analysis of distribution statistics. , 1979, Psychological bulletin.

[18]  S. Miyauchi,et al.  Neural mechanisms of spatial stimulus–response compatibility: the effect of crossed-hand position , 2004, Experimental Brain Research.

[19]  U. Ansorge Spatial Simon effects and compatibility effects induced by observed gaze direction , 2003 .

[20]  D. Balota,et al.  Word frequency, repetition, and lexicality effects in word recognition tasks: beyond measures of central tendency. , 1999, Journal of experimental psychology. General.

[21]  R. Proctor,et al.  Does right-left prevalence occur for the Simon effect? , 2003, Perception & psychophysics.

[22]  E Donchin,et al.  A new method for off-line removal of ocular artifact. , 1983, Electroencephalography and clinical neurophysiology.

[23]  F. Valle-Inclán,et al.  The locus of interference in the Simon effect: an ERP study , 1996, Biological Psychology.

[24]  J. C. Johnston,et al.  Locus of the single-channel bottleneck in dual-task interference , 1992 .

[25]  Sylvan Kornblum,et al.  Distributional Analysis and De Jong, Liang, and Lauber's (1994) Dual-Process Model of the Simon Effect , 1997 .

[26]  M. Coles Modern mind-brain reading: psychophysiology, physiology, and cognition. , 1989, Psychophysiology.

[27]  Rolf Verleger,et al.  Validity and boundary conditions of automatic response activation in the Simon task. , 2001, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[28]  Carlo Umiltà,et al.  Egocentric and relative spatial codes in S-R compatibility , 1987 .

[29]  C. Umilta,et al.  Right—left prevalence effect with horizontal and vertical effectors , 2004, Perception & psychophysics.

[30]  R. Proctor,et al.  Intrahemispherical activation, visuomotor transmission, and the Simon effect: comment on Wascher et al. (2001). , 2003, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[31]  B. Hommel Spontaneous decay of response-code activation , 1994, Psychological research.

[32]  G. Band,et al.  Speed-accuracy modulation in case of conflict: the roles of activation and inhibition , 2003, Psychological research.

[33]  H. Pashler Dual-task interference in simple tasks: data and theory. , 1994, Psychological bulletin.

[34]  J. Richard Simon,et al.  The effect of an irrelevant directional cue on choice reaction time: Duration of the phenomenon and its relation to stages of processing , 1976 .

[35]  Martin Eimer,et al.  The lateralized readiness potential as an on-line measure of central response activation processes , 1998 .

[36]  Rolf Verleger,et al.  Influence of Time Pressure in a Simple Response Task, a Choice- by-Location Task, and the Simon Task , 2001 .

[37]  P. Fitts,et al.  S-R compatibility: spatial characteristics of stimulus and response codes. , 1953, Journal of experimental psychology.

[38]  R. Oostenveld,et al.  Attention and movement-related motor cortex activation: a high-density EEG study of spatial stimulus-response compatibility. , 2003, Brain research. Cognitive brain research.

[39]  E. Soetens,et al.  Control over location-based response activation in the Simon task: behavioral and electrophysiological evidence. , 2002, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[40]  A Heathcote,et al.  Response time distributions and the Stroop Task: a test of the Cohen, Dunbar, and McClelland (1990) model. , 1992, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[41]  Carlo Umilta,et al.  Responding with hand and foot: The right/left prevalence in spatial compatibility is still present , 1985, Perception & psychophysics.

[42]  Roberto Nicoletti,et al.  Spatial stimulus-response compatibility. , 1990 .

[43]  R. Proctor,et al.  The influence of irrelevant location information on performance: A review of the Simon and spatial Stroop effects , 1995, Psychonomic bulletin & review.

[44]  Wolfgang Prinz,et al.  S-R compatibility and response selection , 1995 .

[45]  S. Geisser,et al.  On methods in the analysis of profile data , 1959 .

[46]  Robert W. Proctor,et al.  Stimulus-Response Compatibility: An Integrated Perspective , 1990 .