Functional Interdependence in Coupled Dissipative Structures: Physical Foundations of Biological Coordination

Coordination within and between organisms is one of the most complex abilities of living systems, requiring the concerted regulation of many physiological constituents, and this complexity can be particularly difficult to explain by appealing to physics. A valuable framework for understanding biological coordination is the coordinative structure, a self-organized assembly of physiological elements that collectively performs a specific function. Coordinative structures are characterized by three properties: (1) multiple coupled components, (2) soft-assembly, and (3) functional organization. Coordinative structures have been hypothesized to be specific instantiations of dissipative structures, non-equilibrium, self-organized, physical systems exhibiting complex pattern formation in structure and behaviors. We pursued this hypothesis by testing for these three properties of coordinative structures in an electrically-driven dissipative structure. Our system demonstrates dynamic reorganization in response to functional perturbation, a behavior of coordinative structures called reciprocal compensation. Reciprocal compensation is corroborated by a dynamical systems model of the underlying physics. This coordinated activity of the system appears to derive from the system’s intrinsic end-directed behavior to maximize the rate of entropy production. The paper includes three primary components: (1) empirical data on emergent coordinated phenomena in a physical system, (2) computational simulations of this physical system, and (3) theoretical evaluation of the empirical and simulated results in the context of physics and the life sciences. This study reveals similarities between an electrically-driven dissipative structure that exhibits end-directed behavior and the goal-oriented behaviors of more complex living systems.

[1]  M. L. Kaplan,et al.  The self-organization of human psychological functioning. , 1991, Behavioral science.

[2]  M. Latash,et al.  Force sharing among fingers as a model of the redundancy problem , 1998, Experimental Brain Research.

[3]  Hermann Haken,et al.  The Science of Structure: Synergetics , 1984 .

[4]  R. J. Field,et al.  Oscillations and Traveling Waves in Chemical Systems , 1985 .

[5]  Michael J. Richardson,et al.  Toward a radically embodied, embedded social psychology , 2009 .

[6]  Michael T. Turvey,et al.  Thermodynamic Reasons for Perception--Action Cycles , 1991 .

[7]  James A Dixon,et al.  Oscillatory dynamics of an electrically driven dissipative structure , 2019, PloS one.

[8]  Joseph Jun,et al.  Formation and structure of ramified charge transportation networks in an electromechanical system. , 2005, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[9]  T. Nakagaki,et al.  Intelligence: Maze-solving by an amoeboid organism , 2000, Nature.

[10]  I. Prigogine,et al.  On symmetry-breaking instabilities in dissipative systems , 1967 .

[11]  P. N. Kugler,et al.  1 On the Concept of Coordinative Structures as Dissipative Structures: I. Theoretical Lines of Convergence* , 1980 .

[12]  Keith Davids,et al.  Interpersonal Coordination and Performance in Social Systems , 2016 .

[13]  Matthias Bethge,et al.  DeepLabCut: markerless pose estimation of user-defined body parts with deep learning , 2018, Nature Neuroscience.

[14]  T. Seeley,et al.  Collective decision-making in honey bees: how colonies choose among nectar sources , 1991, Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology.

[15]  Scott S. Wiltermuth,et al.  Synchrony and Cooperation , 2009, Psychological science.

[16]  M. Turvey,et al.  Phase transitions and critical fluctuations in the visual coordination of rhythmic movements between people. , 1990, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[17]  Lena H Ting,et al.  A limited set of muscle synergies for force control during a postural task. , 2005, Journal of neurophysiology.

[18]  Kevin Shockley,et al.  Interpersonal and intrapersonal coordinative modes for joint and single task performance. , 2012, Human movement science.

[19]  N. A. Bernstein.  The Bernstein Problem: How Does the Central Nervous System Make Its Choices? , 2014 .

[20]  B. Kay,et al.  Collective Dissipative Structures, Force Flow Reciprocity, and the Foundations of Perception–Action Mutuality , 2020 .

[21]  C. Gallistel.  Coordinate Transformations in the Genesis of Directed Action , 1999 .

[22]  Michael A Riley,et al.  Synergies in intra- and interpersonal interlimb rhythmic coordination. , 2007, Motor control.

[23]  R. G. Endres.  Entropy production selects nonequilibrium states in multistable systems , 2017, Scientific Reports.

[24]  Kevin Shockley,et al.  Interpersonal Synergies , 2010, Front. Psychology.

[25]  Tehran J. Davis,et al.  Spontaneous Interentity Coordination in a Dissipative Structure , 2016 .

[26]  Shu-Kun Lin,et al.  Modern Thermodynamics: From Heat Engines to Dissipative Structures , 1999, Entropy.

[27]  Richard C. Schmidt,et al.  Scaffolds for Social Meaning , 2007 .

[28]  Verónica C. Ramenzoni,et al.  Effects of Joint Task Performance on Interpersonal Postural Coordination , 2008 .

[29]  Daniel C. Richardson,et al.  Social coordination of verbal and non-verbal behaviours , 2016 .

[30]  G. W. Paltridge,et al.  Global dynamics and climate - a system of minimum entropy exchange , 1975 .

[31]  M. Jagodič,et al.  Bacterial chemotaxis and entropy production , 2007, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.

[32]  B. Kay,et al.  End-directed evolution and the emergence of energy-seeking behavior in a complex system. , 2015, Physical review. E, Statistical, nonlinear, and soft matter physics.

[33]  J. Vallino,et al.  Using maximum entropy production to describe microbial biogeochemistry over time and space in a meromictic pond , 2018, bioRxiv.

[34]  J. Kelso,et al.  Functionally specific articulatory cooperation following jaw perturbations during speech: evidence for coordinative structures. , 1984, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[35]  J. F. Soechting,et al.  Force synergies for multifingered grasping , 2000, Experimental Brain Research.

[36]  M. T. Turvey,et al.  Issues in the theory of action : Degree of freedom, coordinative structures and coalitions , 1978 .

[37]  M. Turvey.  Action and perception at the level of synergies. , 2007, Human movement science.

[38]  G. Nicolis,et al.  Physics of far-from-equilibrium systems and self-organisation , 1989 .

[39]  Jürgen Kurths,et al.  Synchronization - A Universal Concept in Nonlinear Sciences , 2001, Cambridge Nonlinear Science Series.

[40]  Self-Organization, Entropy Production, and Physical Intelligence , 2012 .

[41]  L. Martyushev,et al.  Maximum entropy production principle in physics, chemistry and biology , 2006 .

[42]  Keith R. Skene.  Life's a Gas: A Thermodynamic Theory of Biological Evolution , 2015, Entropy.

[43]  Michael J. Richardson,et al.  Contrasting Approaches to Perceiving and Acting With Others , 2006 .

[44]  A. Ohmura,et al.  The second law of thermodynamics and the global climate system: A review of the maximum entropy production principle , 2003 .

[45]  R J Full,et al.  How animals move: an integrative view. , 2000, Science.

[46]  Vladimir M. Zatsiorsky,et al.  A central back-coupling hypothesis on the organization of motor synergies: a physical metaphor and a neural model , 2005, Biological Cybernetics.

[47]  Michael J. Hove,et al.  It's all in the timing: Interpersonal synchrony increases affiliation , 2009 .

[48]  A. Vaidya,et al.  Entropy production in a fluid-solid system far from thermodynamic equilibrium , 2017, The European physical journal. E, Soft matter.