Relating the Detection Response Task to Critical Events – Consequences of high Cognitive Workload to Brake Reaction Times

Abstract Currently the use of new interaction modalities with in-vehicle information systems (IVIS), for example speech interaction, leads to a shift from visual-manual workload to more cognitive workload. The aim of this study was to better determine the link between increasing cognitive workload and corresponding reaction times that are relevant to the driving task, for example brake reactions to sudden events. In a driving simulator study with 35 middle-aged participants, subjects had to remember a series of digits ranging from 2 to 5 numbers, recall them in the reverse order and additionally react to suddenly appearing pedestrians. Cognitive workload was assessed by a head-mounted detection response task (DRT). It was hypothesized that with increasing difficulty of the cognitive task, hence increasing cognitive workload, reaction times to the DRT as well as brake reaction times to the pedestrian increase. DRT reaction time increased significantly with ascending number of digits. However, increasing cognitive workload did not affect brake reaction times in this setting. One reason might be the strong salience of pedestrians as a stimulus, leading to no increase in reaction time.

[1]  William P. Berg,et al.  The effect of cellular telephone conversation and music listening on response time in braking , 2009 .

[2]  Maximilian Schwalm,et al.  Analysis of compensative behavior in demanding driving situations , 2014 .

[3]  G. G. Stokes "J." , 1890, The New Yale Book of Quotations.

[4]  Yuzuru Tanaka,et al.  Engineering Psychology and Cognitive Ergonomics , 2016, Lecture Notes in Computer Science.

[5]  Matthew Witte,et al.  Effect of cellular telephone conversations and other potential interference on reaction time in a braking response. , 2003, Accident; analysis and prevention.

[6]  Thomas J Triggs,et al.  Driver distraction: the effects of concurrent in-vehicle tasks, road environment complexity and age on driving performance. , 2006, Accident; analysis and prevention.

[7]  Don Harris,et al.  Engineering Psychology and Cognitive Ergonomics. Understanding Human Cognition , 2013, Lecture Notes in Computer Science.

[8]  Josef F. Krems,et al.  Using an infotainment system while driving: a continuous analysis of behavior adaptations , 2013 .

[9]  Andreas Keinath,et al.  Effects of Task and Presentation Modality in Detection Response Tasks , 2013, HCI.

[10]  W. Berg,et al.  Effect of the Intensity of Wireless Telephone Conversations on Reaction Time in a Braking Response , 2000, Perceptual and motor skills.

[11]  Frank Drews,et al.  Profiles in Driver Distraction: Effects of Cell Phone Conversations on Younger and Older Drivers , 2004, Hum. Factors.

[12]  A. Pauzie,et al.  A method to assess the driver mental workload: The driving activity load index (DALI) , 2008 .

[13]  Jeff K Caird,et al.  A meta-analysis of the effects of cell phones on driver performance. , 2008, Accident; analysis and prevention.