Infrared Cloud Imager Development for Atmospheric Optical Communication Characterization, and Measurements at the JPL Table Mountain Facility

The continuous demand for high data return in deep space and near-Earth satellite missions has led NASA and international institutions to consider alternative tech- nologies for high-data-rate communications. One solution is the establishment of wide- bandwidth Earth-space optical communication links, which require (among other things) a nearly obstruction-free atmospheric path. Considering the atmospheric channel, the most common and most apparent impairments on Earth-space optical communication paths arise from clouds. Therefore, the characterization of the statistical behavior of cloud cover- age for optical communication ground station candidate sites is of vital importance. In this article, we describe the development and deployment of a ground-based, long-wavelength infrared cloud imaging system able to monitor and characterize the cloud coverage. This system is based on a commercially available camera with a 62-deg diagonal field of view. A novel internal-shutter-based calibration technique allows radiometric calibration of the camera, which operates without a thermoelectric cooler. This cloud imaging system pro- vides continuous day-night cloud detection with constant sensitivity. The cloud imaging system also includes data-processing algorithms that calculate and remove atmospheric emission to isolate cloud signatures, and enable classification of clouds according to their optical attenuation. Measurements of long-wavelength infrared cloud radiance are used to retrieve the optical attenuation (cloud optical depth due to absorption and scattering) in the wavelength range of interest from visible to near-infrared, where the cloud attenuation is quite constant. This article addresses the specifics of the operation, calibration, and data processing of the imaging system that was deployed at the NASA/JPL Table Mountain Facil- ity (TMF) in California. Data are reported from July 2008 to July 2010. These data describe seasonal variability in cloud cover at the TMF site, with cloud amount (percentage of cloudy pixels) peaking at just over 51 percent during February, of which more than 60 percent had optical attenuation exceeding 12 dB at wavelengths in the range from the visible to the near-infrared. The lowest cloud amount was found during August, averaging 19.6 percent, and these clouds were mostly optically thin, with low attenuation.

[1]  Hamid Hemmati,et al.  Deep space optical communications , 2006 .

[2]  X. Wang,et al.  Spaceborne lidar calibration from cirrus and molecular backscatter returns , 2002, IEEE Trans. Geosci. Remote. Sens..

[3]  J. Shields,et al.  The Whole Sky Imager - A Year of Progress , 1998 .

[4]  F. X. Kneizys,et al.  AFGL (Air Force Geophysical Laboratory) atmospheric constituent profiles (0. 120km). Environmental research papers , 1986 .

[5]  D. M. Boroson,et al.  The Lunar Laser Communications Demonstration (LLCD) , 2009, 2009 Third IEEE International Conference on Space Mission Challenges for Information Technology.

[6]  F. X. Kneizys,et al.  AFGL atmospheric constituent profiles (0-120km) , 1986 .

[7]  K. E. Wilson,et al.  The JPL optical communications telescope laboratory (OCTL) test bed for the future optical Deep Space Network , 2003 .

[8]  J. Goldsmith,et al.  Turn-key Raman lidar for profiling atmospheric water vapor, clouds, and aerosols. , 1997, Applied optics.

[9]  A. Smirnov,et al.  AERONET-a federated instrument network and data archive for aerosol Characterization , 1998 .

[10]  Q. Fu,et al.  Parameterization of the Radiative Properties of Cirrus Clouds , 1993 .

[11]  James H. Churnside,et al.  Atmospheric propagation issues relevant to optical communications , 1988 .

[12]  Joseph A. Shaw,et al.  Wide angle infrared cloud imaging for measuring cloud statistics in support of earth space optical communication , 2007, SPIE Optical Engineering + Applications.

[13]  Joseph A. Shaw,et al.  Cloud statistics measured with the infrared cloud imager (ICI) , 2005, IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing.

[14]  Randall J. Alliss,et al.  Deep-space to ground laser communications in a cloudy world , 2005, SPIE Optics + Photonics.

[15]  Nathan J. Pust,et al.  Correcting Calibrated Infrared Sky Imagery for the Effect of an Infrared Window , 2009 .

[16]  W. Paul Menzel,et al.  The MODIS cloud products: algorithms and examples from Terra , 2003, IEEE Trans. Geosci. Remote. Sens..

[17]  Sabino Piazzolla,et al.  Infrared cloud imaging in support of Earth-space optical communication. , 2009, Optics express.

[18]  Kohei Mizutani,et al.  Radiometric cloud imaging with an uncooled microbolometer thermal infrared camera. , 2005, Optics express.

[19]  P. Nugent Wide-angle infrared cloud imaging for cloud cover statistics , 2008 .

[20]  C. Tomasi Determination of the Total Precipitable Water by Varying the Intercept in Reitan's Relationship. , 1981 .

[21]  L. R. Thorne,et al.  Inferring spatial clouds statistics from limited field-of-view, zenith observations , 1996 .

[22]  Anthony J. Ratkowski,et al.  MODTRAN4: radiative transfer modeling for remote sensing , 1999, Remote Sensing.

[23]  Clayton H. Reitan Surface Dew Point and Water Vapor Aloft , 1963 .

[24]  Keith E. Wilson,et al.  The Laser Communications Relay Demonstration , 2012 .

[25]  J. Scott Tyo,et al.  Algorithm for radiometrically accurate nonuniformity correction with arbitrary scene motion , 2003, SPIE Defense + Commercial Sensing.

[26]  Hamid Hemmati,et al.  Near-Earth Laser Communications , 2009, Near-Earth Laser Communications.

[27]  E. O'connor,et al.  The CloudSat mission and the A-train: a new dimension of space-based observations of clouds and precipitation , 2002 .