Coherent electronic transfer in quantum dot systems using adiabatic passage

We describe a scheme for using an all-electrical, rapid, adiabatic population transfer between two spatially separated dots in a triple-quantum dot system. The electron spends no time in the middle dot and does not change its energy during the transfer process. Although a coherent population transfer method, this scheme may well prove useful in incoherent electronic computation (for example quantum-dot cellular automata) where it may provide a coherent advantage to an otherwise incoherent device. It can also be thought of as a limiting case of type II quantum computing, where sufficient coherence exists for a single gate operation, but not for the preservation of superpositions after the operation. We extend our analysis to the case of many intervening dots and address the issue of transporting quantum information through a multi-dot system.

[1]  Michel Devoret,et al.  Single Charge Tunneling , 1992 .

[2]  David J. Tannor,et al.  Simple and robust extension of the stimulated Raman adiabatic passage technique toN-level systems , 1997 .

[3]  W. V. D. Wiel,et al.  Electron transport through double quantum dots , 2002, cond-mat/0205350.

[4]  N. Vitanov,et al.  Laser-induced population transfer by adiabatic passage techniques. , 2001, Annual review of physical chemistry.

[5]  Coherent population transfer in coupled semiconductor quantum dots , 2000, cond-mat/0008058.

[6]  I. Chuang,et al.  Quantum Computation and Quantum Information: Bibliography , 2010 .

[7]  SG Schirmer,et al.  Experimental Hamiltonian identification for controlled two-level systems , 2004 .

[8]  J. Mompart,et al.  Three-level atom optics via the tunneling interaction , 2004 .

[9]  J. Yepez.  TYPE-II QUANTUM COMPUTERS , 2001 .

[10]  L. Fedichkin,et al.  Error rate of a charge qubit coupled to an acoustic phonon reservoir (4 pages) , 2004 .

[11]  Klaas Bergmann,et al.  LASER-DRIVEN POPULATION TRANSFER IN FOUR-LEVEL ATOMS : CONSEQUENCES OF NON-ABELIAN GEOMETRICAL ADIABATIC PHASE FACTORS , 1999 .

[12]  G. J. Milburn,et al.  Charge-based quantum computing using single donors in semiconductors , 2004 .

[13]  Charge shelving and bias spectroscopy for the readout of a charge qubit on the basis of superposition states , 2003, cond-mat/0308302.

[14]  P. D. Tougaw,et al.  Bistable saturation in coupled quantum‐dot cells , 1993 .

[15]  Generation of spatially separated spin entanglement in a triple-quantum-dot system , 2003, cond-mat/0307037.

[16]  G. J. Milburn,et al.  Measuring the decoherence rate in a semiconductor charge qubit , 2003 .

[17]  R. Blick,et al.  Adiabatic steering and determination of dephasing rates in double-dot qubits , 2001, cond-mat/0104435.

[18]  T. M. Buehler,et al.  Progress in silicon-based quantum computing , 2003, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences.

[19]  G. Tóth,et al.  Quantum computing with quantum-dot cellular automata , 2001 .

[20]  U. Gaubatz,et al.  Population transfer between molecular vibrational levels by stimulated Raman scattering with partially overlapping laser fields. A new concept and experimental results , 1990 .

[21]  C. Lent,et al.  Maxwell's demon and quantum-dot cellular automata , 2003 .

[22]  G. Tóth,et al.  QUASIADIABATIC SWITCHING FOR METAL-ISLAND QUANTUM-DOT CELLULAR AUTOMATA , 1999, cond-mat/0004457.

[23]  Y. Pashkin,et al.  Coherent control of macroscopic quantum states in a single-Cooper-pair box , 1999, Nature.