The design space exploration assistance method: constraints and objectives

In the early design stages of buildings, architects cope with a multitude of decisions that affect the later performance of the building. Most of these decisions have a fundamental impact on the building design - later changes are impossible or require a very high effort. When taking these decisions, numerous constraints and objectives have to be considered. With today’s mainly manual design workflows, only very few design options can be elaborated and evaluated against the various performance criteria. In consequence, the design space (the space of all possible design options) is explored only to a very limited extend and finding a good solution depends strongly on the experience of the designing architect. To cope with this issue and to better support architects in the early design stage, we are developing the Design Space Exploration Assistance Method (DSEAM). The method aims at applying techniques of advanced computation to provide comprehensive information and design options. To provide a sound foundation for this method, this paper investigates how relevant and evaluable the individual objectives and performance criteria are. In addition, we discuss the importance of geometric constraints in building design and describe an approach which allows architects to define them in an intuitive interactive graphical manner.

[1]  Terje Haukaas,et al.  Computer Program for Multimodel Reliability and Optimization Analysis , 2013, J. Comput. Civ. Eng..

[2]  Moghaddam Rad Farham,et al.  Leadership in Energy and Environmental Design , 2014 .

[3]  Julio Fern'andez-Ceniceros,et al.  Decision support model for one-way floor slab design: A sustainable approach , 2013 .

[4]  John Haymaker,et al.  Design Scenarios: Enabling transparent parametric design spaces , 2012, Adv. Eng. Informatics.

[5]  Paola Sanguinetti,et al.  General system architecture for BIM: An integrated approach for design and analysis , 2012, Adv. Eng. Informatics.

[6]  Wenjie Yang,et al.  Performance-driven architectural design and optimization technique from a perspective of architects , 2013 .

[7]  Sobieszczanski Jaroslaw,et al.  Bi-Level Integrated System Synthesis (BLISS) , 1998 .

[8]  Joel Ann Todd,et al.  Continuous Improvement of the U.S. Green Building Council's Leadership in Energy and Environmental Design (LEED®) Rating System™ , 2008 .

[9]  Philipp Geyer,et al.  Component-oriented decomposition for multidisciplinary design optimization in building design , 2009, Adv. Eng. Informatics.

[10]  Wei Wu,et al.  Leveraging Cloud-BIM for LEED Automation , 2012, J. Inf. Technol. Constr..

[11]  Vítor Leal,et al.  Building envelope shape design in early stages of the design process: Integrating architectural design systems and energy simulation , 2013 .

[12]  David Jason Gerber,et al.  Design optioneering: multi-disciplinary design optimization through parameterization, domain integration and automation of a genetic algorithm , 2012, ANSS 2012.

[13]  Arno Schlueter,et al.  Building information model based energy/exergy performance assessment in early design stages , 2009 .