Designing and testing lightweight shoulder prostheses with hybrid actuators for movements involved in typical activities of daily living and impact absorption

Unlike forearm amputees, transhumeral amputees have residual stumps that are too small to provide a sufficient range of operation for their prosthetic parts to perform usual activities of daily living. Furthermore, it is difficult for small residual stumps to provide sufficient impact absorption for safe manipulation in daily living, as intact arms do. Therefore, substitution of upper limb function in transhumeral amputees requires a sufficient range of motion and sufficient viscoelasticity for shoulder prostheses under critical weight and dimension constraints. We propose the use of two different types of actuators, ie, pneumatic elastic actuators (PEAs) and servo motors. PEAs offer high power-to-weight performance and have intrinsic viscoelasticity in comparison with motors or standard industrial pneumatic cylinder actuators. However, the usefulness of PEAs in large working spaces is limited because of their short strokes. Servo motors, in contrast, can be used to achieve large ranges of motion. In this study, the relationship between the force and stroke of PEAs was investigated. The impact absorption of both types of actuators was measured using a single degree-of-freedom prototype to evaluate actuator compliance for safety purposes. Based on the fundamental properties of the actuators identified, a four degree-of-freedom robotic arm is proposed for prosthetic use. The configuration of the actuators and functional parts was designed to achieve a specified range of motion and torque calculated from the results of a simulation of typical movements performed in usual activities of daily living. Our experimental results showed that the requirements for the shoulder prostheses could be satisfied.

[1]  J. Edward Colgate,et al.  Design of components for programmable passive impedance , 1991, Proceedings. 1991 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation.

[2]  Hiroshi Yokoi,et al.  Tendon drive finger mechanisms for an EMG prosthetic hand with two motors , 2014, 2014 7th International Conference on Biomedical Engineering and Informatics.

[3]  Tsukasa Ogasawara,et al.  Trans-radial prosthesis with three opposed fingers , 2013, 2013 IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems.

[4]  S. Stramigioli,et al.  Evaluation of pneumatic cylinder actuators for hand prostheses , 2012, 2012 4th IEEE RAS & EMBS International Conference on Biomedical Robotics and Biomechatronics (BioRob).

[5]  Wenwei Yu,et al.  Development of MorphHand: Design of an underactuated anthropomorphic rubber finger for a prosthetic hand using compliant joints , 2012, 2012 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Biomimetics (ROBIO).

[6]  D H Plettenburg,et al.  Electric versus pneumatic power in hand prostheses for children. , 1989, Journal of medical engineering & technology.

[7]  S. Toyama,et al.  Development of An Artificial Arm by Using a Spherical Ultrasonic Motor. , 2001 .

[8]  John T. Wen,et al.  Stability analysis of position and force control for robot arms , 1991 .

[9]  Roseleena Jaafar,et al.  Hybrid-Actuated Finger Prosthesis with Tactile Sensing , 2013 .

[10]  T. Kuiken,et al.  Control of a six degree of freedom prosthetic arm after targeted muscle reinnervation surgery. , 2008, Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation.

[11]  Xiangrong Shen,et al.  A Gas-Actuated Anthropomorphic Prosthesis for Transhumeral Amputees , 2008, IEEE Transactions on Robotics.

[12]  Shaowei Fan,et al.  Design and control of a multisensory five-finger prosthetic hand , 2014, Proceeding of the 11th World Congress on Intelligent Control and Automation.

[13]  Jun Kobayashi,et al.  Transhumeral prosthesis prototype with 3D printing and sEMG-based elbow joint control method , 2014, Proceedings of the 2014 International Conference on Advanced Mechatronic Systems.

[14]  Wenwei Yu,et al.  Psycho-physiological assessment of a prosthetic hand sensory feedback system based on an auditory display: a preliminary study , 2012, Journal of NeuroEngineering and Rehabilitation.

[15]  S.K. Kundu,et al.  Development of a 5 DOF prosthetic arm for above elbow amputees , 2008, 2008 IEEE International Conference on Mechatronics and Automation.

[16]  Linda Resnik,et al.  The DEKA Arm: Its features, functionality, and evolution during the Veterans Affairs Study to optimize the DEKA Arm , 2014, Prosthetics and orthotics international.

[17]  D.H. Plattenburg Pneumatic actuators: a comparison of energy-to-mass ratio's , 2005, 9th International Conference on Rehabilitation Robotics, 2005. ICORR 2005..

[18]  Wenwei Yu,et al.  Designing and testing a hybrid lightweight shoulder prosthesis , 2014, 2014 36th Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society.

[19]  Aiguo Song,et al.  Robot-Aided Upper-Limb Rehabilitation Based on Motor Imagery EEG , 2011 .

[20]  Shigeki Sugano,et al.  Design and development of a new robot joint using a mechanical impedance adjuster , 1995, Proceedings of 1995 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation.

[21]  Paolo Bifulco,et al.  Design and assessment of a low-cost, electromyographically controlled, prosthetic hand , 2013, Medical devices.