Sensory evaluation and electronic tongue for sensing flavored mineral water taste attributes.

In this article a trained sensory panel evaluated 6 flavored mineral water samples. The samples consisted of 3 different brands, each with 2 flavors (pear-lemon grass and josta berry). The applied sensory method was profile analysis. Our aim was to analyze the sensory profiles and to investigate the similarities between the sensitivity of the trained human panel and an electronic tongue device. Another objective was to demonstrate the possibilities for the prediction of sensory attributes from electronic tongue measurements using a multivariate statistical method (Partial Least Squares regression [PLS]). The results showed that the products manufactured under different brand name but with the same aromas had very similar sensory profiles. The panel performance evaluation showed that it is appropriate (discrimination ability, repeatability, and panel consensus) to compare the panel's results with the results of the electronic tongue. The samples can be discriminated by the electronic tongue and an accurate classification model can be built. Principal Component Analysis BiPlot diagrams showed that Brand A and B were similar because the manufacturers use the same aroma brands for their products. It can be concluded that Brand C was quite different compared to the other samples independently of the aroma content. Based on the electronic tongue results good prediction models can be obtained with high correlation coefficient (r(2) > 0.81) and low prediction error (RMSEP < 13.71 on the scale of the sensory evaluation from 0 to 100).

[1]  Frank Westad,et al.  Prediction of Microbial and Sensory Quality of Cold Smoked Atlantic Salmon (Salmo salar) by Electronic Nose , 2006 .

[2]  Tormod Næs,et al.  A bridge between Tucker-1 and Carroll's generalized canonical analysis , 2006, Comput. Stat. Data Anal..

[3]  Tormod Næs,et al.  Quality Control of Sensory Profile Data , 2010 .

[4]  B. Nicolai,et al.  Instrumental measurement of beer taste attributes using an electronic tongue. , 2009, Analytica chimica acta.

[5]  Richard G. Brereton Comparing Different Patterns , 2009 .

[6]  Tormod Næs,et al.  Statistics for Sensory and Consumer Science , 2010 .

[7]  Tormod Næs,et al.  Some new tools for visualising multi-way sensory data , 2008 .

[8]  Hao Lin,et al.  Study on classification of soy sauce by electronic tongue technique combined with artificial neural network. , 2011, Journal of food science.

[9]  G. Echeverría,et al.  Assessment of Relationships between Sensory and Instrumental Quality of Controlled‐atmosphere‐stored ‘Fuji’ Apples by Multivariate Analysis , 2006 .

[10]  Károly Héberger,et al.  Principal component and linear discriminant analyses of free amino acids and biogenic amines in hungarian wines. , 2003, Journal of agricultural and food chemistry.

[11]  Kiyoshi Toko,et al.  Heat Effect on the Taste of Milk Studied Using a Taste Sensor , 1995 .

[12]  Tormod Næs,et al.  A user-friendly guide to multivariate calibration and classification , 2002 .

[13]  Tormod Næs,et al.  Analysing sensory panel performance in a proficiency test using the PanelCheck software , 2009 .

[14]  H. Stone,et al.  Comparison of sensory and consumer results with electronic nose and tongue sensors for apple juices , 2002 .

[15]  Kiyoshi Toko,et al.  Biomimetic Sensor Technology , 2000 .

[16]  Per B. Brockhoff,et al.  Statistical testing of individual differences in sensory profiling , 2003 .

[17]  Richard G. Brereton,et al.  Chemometrics for Pattern Recognition , 2009 .

[18]  Harry T. Lawless,et al.  Sensory Evaluation of Food , 1999 .

[19]  C. Balla,et al.  Electronic tongue for sensing taste changes with apricots during storage , 2008 .