Informational masking: counteracting the effects of stimulus uncertainty by decreasing target-masker similarity.

Previous work has indicated that target-masker similarity, as well as stimulus uncertainty, influences the amount of informational masking that occurs in detection, discrimination, and recognition tasks. In each of five experiments reported in this paper, the detection threshold for a tonal target in random multitone maskers presented simultaneously with the target tone was measured for two conditions using the same set of five listeners. In one condition, the target was constructed to be "similar" (S) to the masker; in the other condition, it was constructed to be "dissimilar" (D) to the masker. The specific masker varied across experiments, but was constant for the two conditions. Target-masker similarity varied in dimensions such as duration, perceived location, direction of frequency glide, and spectro-temporal coherence. Group-mean results show large decreases in the amount of masking for the D condition relative to the S condition. In addition, individual differences (a hallmark of informational masking) are found to be much greater in the S condition than in the D condition. Furthermore, listener vulnerability to informational masking is found to be consistent to at least a moderate degree across experiments.

[1]  H S Colburn,et al.  Reducing informational masking by sound segregation. , 1994, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[2]  R A Lutfi,et al.  Effect of masker harmonicity on informational masking. , 2000, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[3]  M. Turvey On peripheral and central processes in vision: inferences from an information-processing analysis of masking with patterned stimuli. , 1973, Psychological review.

[4]  M. Ericson,et al.  Informational and energetic masking effects in the perception of multiple simultaneous talkers. , 2001, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[5]  R A Lutfi A model of auditory pattern analysis based on component-relative-entropy. , 1993, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[6]  R L Freyman,et al.  The role of perceived spatial separation in the unmasking of speech. , 1999, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[7]  R L Freyman,et al.  Spatial release from informational masking in speech recognition. , 2001, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[8]  T W Tillman,et al.  Perceptual masking in multiple sound backgrounds. , 1969, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[9]  C. Watson,et al.  Perception of complex auditory patterns by humans. , 1989 .

[10]  W Jesteadt,et al.  Informational masking for multicomponent maskers with spectral gaps. , 1993, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[11]  D. M. Green,et al.  Masking produced by spectral uncertainty with multicomponent maskers , 1987, Perception & psychophysics.

[12]  B. Shinn-Cunningham,et al.  Note on informational masking (L) , 2003 .

[13]  E. Carterette,et al.  Some Factors Affecting Multi‐Channel Listening , 1954 .

[14]  G. Kidd,et al.  The effect of spatial separation on informational and energetic masking of speech. , 2002, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[15]  R A Lutfi,et al.  Nonmonotonicity of informational masking. , 1998, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[16]  B A Wright,et al.  Strategies used to detect auditory signals in small sets of random maskers. , 1999, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[17]  J. Goodman,et al.  Perceptual masking of spondees by combinations of talkers , 1975 .

[18]  Albert S. Bregman,et al.  The Auditory Scene. (Book Reviews: Auditory Scene Analysis. The Perceptual Organization of Sound.) , 1990 .

[19]  Virginia M Richards,et al.  Informational masking with small set sizes. , 2002, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[20]  D L Neff Signal properties that reduce masking by simultaneous, random-frequency maskers. , 1995, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[21]  Marjorie R. Leek,et al.  Informational masking and auditory attention , 1991, Perception & psychophysics.

[22]  Robert A Lutfi,et al.  One factor underlies individual differences in auditory informational masking within and across age groups , 2003, Perception & psychophysics.

[23]  G. Kidd,et al.  Similarity, uncertainty, and masking in the identification of nonspeech auditory patterns. , 2002, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[24]  R A Lutfi,et al.  How much masking is informational masking? , 1990, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[25]  Charles S. Watson,et al.  Auditory Processing of Complex Sounds , 1990 .

[26]  D L Neff,et al.  Individual differences in simultaneous masking with random-frequency, multicomponent maskers. , 1995, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[27]  C S Watson,et al.  Factors in the discrimination of tonal patterns. II. Selective attention and learning under various levels of stimulus uncertainty. , 1976, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[28]  B. Shinn-Cunningham,et al.  Note on informational masking. , 2003, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[29]  D S Brungart,et al.  Informational and energetic masking effects in the perception of two simultaneous talkers. , 2001, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[30]  Gerald Kidd,et al.  Informational masking and musical training. , 2003, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.