MR-determined metabolic phenotype of breast cancer in prediction of lymphatic spread, grade, and hormone status

The purpose of the study was to evaluate the use of metabolic phenotype, described by high-resolution magic angle spinning magnetic resonance spectroscopy (HR MAS MRS), as a tool for prediction of histological grade, hormone status, and axillary lymphatic spread in breast cancer patients. Biopsies from breast cancer (n = 91) and adjacent non-involved tissue (n = 48) were excised from patients (n = 77) during surgery. HR MAS MR spectra of intact samples were acquired. Multivariate models relating spectral data to histological grade, lymphatic spread, and hormone status were designed. The multivariate methods applied were variable reduction by principal component analysis (PCA) or partial least-squares regression-uninformative variable elimination (PLS-UVE), and modelling by PLS, probabilistic neural network (PNN), or cascade correlation neural network. In the end, model verification by prediction of blind samples (n = 12) was performed. Validation of PNN training resulted in sensitivity and specificity ranging from 83 to 100% for all predictions. Verification of models by blind sample testing showed that hormone status was well predicted by both PNN and PLS (11 of 12 correct), lymphatic spread was best predicted by PLS (8 of 12), whereas PLS-UVE PNN was the best approach for predicting grade (9 of 12 correct). MR-determined metabolic phenotype may have a future role as a supplement for clinical decision-making-concerning adjuvant treatment and the adaptation to more individualised treatment protocols.

[1]  H. Bloom,et al.  Histological Grading and Prognosis in Breast Cancer , 1957, British Journal of Cancer.

[2]  L. A. Stone,et al.  Computer Aided Design of Experiments , 1969 .

[3]  William J. Welch,et al.  Computer-aided design of experiments , 1981 .

[4]  Christian Lebiere,et al.  The Cascade-Correlation Learning Architecture , 1989, NIPS.

[5]  Donald F. Specht,et al.  Probabilistic neural networks , 1990, Neural Networks.

[6]  I. Ellis,et al.  Pathological prognostic factors in breast cancer. I. The value of histological grade in breast cancer: experience from a large study with long-term follow-up. , 2002, Histopathology.

[7]  Markus Höhfeld,et al.  Learning with limited numerical precision using the cascade-correlation algorithm , 1992, IEEE Trans. Neural Networks.

[8]  W. Negendank,et al.  Studies of human tumors by MRS: A review , 1992, NMR in biomedicine.

[9]  B. Kowalski,et al.  The parsimony principle applied to multivariate calibration , 1993 .

[10]  D. Manallack,et al.  Statistics using neural networks: chance effects. , 1993, Journal of medicinal chemistry.

[11]  C. B. Lucasius,et al.  Understanding and using genetic algorithms Part 1. Concepts, properties and context , 1993 .

[12]  M. Zweig,et al.  Receiver-operating characteristic (ROC) plots: a fundamental evaluation tool in clinical medicine. , 1993, Clinical chemistry.

[13]  Onno E. de Noord,et al.  The influence of data preprocessing on the robustness and parsimony of multivariate calibration models , 1994 .

[14]  D. Massart,et al.  Elimination of uninformative variables for multivariate calibration. , 1996, Analytical chemistry.

[15]  I. Gribbestad,et al.  In vivo 1H MRS of normal breast and breast tumors using a dedicated double breast coil , 1998, Journal of magnetic resonance imaging : JMRI.

[16]  I. Ellis,et al.  Pathological prognostic factors in breast cancer. , 1999, Critical reviews in oncology/hematology.

[17]  I. Gribbestad,et al.  Characterization of neoplastic and normal human breast tissues with in vivo 1H MR spectroscopy , 1999, Journal of magnetic resonance imaging : JMRI.

[18]  B. Sitter,et al.  Metabolite composition in breast tumors examined by proton nuclear magnetic resonance spectroscopy. , 1999, Anticancer research.

[19]  D. Axelson,et al.  Analysis and classification of proton NMR spectra of lipoprotein fractions from healthy volunteers and patients with cancer or CHD. , 2000, Anticancer research.

[20]  C E Mountford,et al.  Diagnosis and prognosis of breast cancer by magnetic resonance spectroscopy of fine‐needle aspirates analysed using a statistical classification strategy , 2001, The British journal of surgery.

[21]  I S Gribbestad,et al.  Classification of in vivo 1H MR spectra from breast tissue using artificial neural networks. , 2001, Anticancer research.

[22]  S. Dwivedi,et al.  Evaluation of total choline from in-vivo volume localized proton MR spectroscopy and its response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy in locally advanced breast cancer , 2001, British Journal of Cancer.

[23]  K. Baumann,et al.  A systematic evaluation of the benefits and hazards of variable selection in latent variable regression. Part I. Search algorithm, theory and simulations , 2002 .

[24]  B. Sitter,et al.  High‐resolution magic angle spinning MRS of breast cancer tissue , 2002, NMR in biomedicine.

[25]  K. Baumann,et al.  A systematic evaluation of the benefits and hazards of variable selection in latent variable regression. Part II. Practical applications , 2002 .

[26]  M. Noguchi,et al.  Therapeutic relevance of breast cancer micrometastases in sentinel lymph nodes , 2002, The British journal of surgery.

[27]  Michael Garwood,et al.  In vivo quantification of choline compounds in the breast with 1H MR spectroscopy , 2003, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[28]  Sung-Hwan Park,et al.  In vivo 1H-MRS evaluation of malignant and benign breast diseases. , 2003, Breast.

[29]  I. Schuppe-Koistinen,et al.  Peak alignment of NMR signals by means of a genetic algorithm , 2003 .

[30]  T. Bathen,et al.  Cervical cancer tissue characterized by high-resolution magic angle spinning MR spectroscopy , 2004, Magnetic Resonance Materials in Physics, Biology and Medicine.

[31]  F. Bray,et al.  Breast cancer incidence and mortality trends in 16 European countries. , 2003, European journal of cancer.

[32]  R. Somorjai,et al.  Determination of Grade and Receptor Status from the Primary Breast Lesion by Magnetic Resonance Spectroscopy , 2004, Technology in cancer research & treatment.

[33]  B. Tomanek,et al.  Specificity of choline metabolites for in vivo diagnosis of breast cancer using 1H MRS at 1.5 T , 2005, European Radiology.

[34]  J. Baselga,et al.  Molecular approach to breast cancer treatment. , 2004, Seminars in oncology.

[35]  A. Häkkinen,et al.  High‐resolution magic angle spinning and 1H magnetic resonance spectroscopy reveal significantly altered neuronal metabolite profiles in CLN1 but not in CLN3 , 2004, Journal of neuroscience research.

[36]  Julian L. Griffin,et al.  Metabolic profiles of cancer cells , 2004, Nature Reviews Cancer.

[37]  David L. Woodruff,et al.  Beam search for peak alignment of NMR signals , 2004 .

[38]  T. Bathen,et al.  Effect of UV-A and UV-B irradiation on the metabolic profile of aqueous humor in rabbits analyzed by 1H NMR spectroscopy. , 2005, Investigative ophthalmology & visual science.