Can Help Seeking Be Tutored? Searching for the Secret Sauce of Metacognitive Tutoring

In our on-going endeavor to teach students better help-seeking skills we designed a three-pronged Help-Seeking Support Environment that includes (a) classroom instruction (b) a Self-Assessment Tutor, to help students evaluate their own need for help, and (c) an updated version of the Help Tutor, which provides feedback with respect to students' help-seeking behavior, as they solve problems with the help of an ITS. In doing so, we attempt to offer a comprehensive help-seeking suite to support the knowledge, skills, and dispositions students need in order to become more effective help seekers. In a classroom evaluation, we found that the Help-Seeking Support Environment was successful in improving students' declarative help-seeking knowledge, but did not improve students' learning at the domain level or their help-seeking behavior in a paper-and-pencil environment. We raise a number of hypotheses in an attempt to explain these results. We question the current focus of metacognitive tutoring, and suggest ways to reexamine the role of help facilities and of metacognitive tutoring within ITSs.

[1]  M. Feldstein.  The Social Time Preference Discount Rate in Cost Benefit Analysis , 1964 .

[2]  J. Frederiksen,et al.  Inquiry, Modeling, and Metacognition: Making Science Accessible to All Students , 1998 .

[3]  D. Wood,et al.  Help seeking, learning and contingent tutoring , 1999, Comput. Educ..

[4]  F. Reif,et al.  Teaching scientific thinking skills: Students and computers coaching each other , 1999 .

[5]  P. Pintrich.  The role of motivation in promoting and sustaining self-regulated learning , 1999 .

[6]  S. Tobias,et al.  Knowing What You Know and What You Don't: Further Research on Metacognitive Knowledge Monitoring , 2002 .

[7]  V. Aleven,et al.  Help Seeking and Help Design in Interactive Learning Environments , 2003 .

[8]  Claudia Gama,et al.  Metacognition in Interactive Learning Environments: The Reflection Assistant Model , 2004, Intelligent Tutoring Systems.

[9]  Ryan Shaun Joazeiro de Baker,et al.  Detecting Student Misuse of Intelligent Tutoring Systems , 2004, Intelligent Tutoring Systems.

[10]  Ryan Shaun Joazeiro de Baker,et al.  Do Performance Goals Lead Students to Game the System? , 2005, AIED.

[11]  Vincent Aleven,et al.  An architecture to combine meta-cognitive and cognitive tutoring: Pilot testing the Help Tutor , 2005, AIED.

[12]  Vincent Aleven,et al.  Modeling Students' Metacognitive Errors in Two Intelligent Tutoring Systems , 2005, User Modeling.

[13]  Vincent Aleven,et al.  Toward Meta-cognitive Tutoring: A Model of Help Seeking with a Cognitive Tutor , 2006, Int. J. Artif. Intell. Educ..

[14]  Vincent Aleven,et al.  The Help Tutor: Does Metacognitive Feedback Improve Students' Help-Seeking Actions, Skills and Learning? , 2006, Intelligent Tutoring Systems.

[15]  Vincent Aleven,et al.  Towards Teaching Metacognition: Supporting Spontaneous Self-Assessment , 2006, Intelligent Tutoring Systems.

[16]  R. Crowley,et al.  Mining Student Learning Data to Develop High Level Pedagogic Strategy in a Medical ITS , 2006 .

[17]  Albert T. Corbett,et al.  Does Help Help ? A Bayes Net Approach to Modeling Tutor Interventions , 2006 .

[18]  Patricia Charlton,et al.  Conference on Artificial Intelligence in Education , 2009 .

[19]  Silke Schworm,et al.  Learning by Solved Example Problems: Instructional Explanations Reduce Self-Explanation Activity , 2002 .