Deformable registration of preoperative MR, pre-resection ultrasound, and post-resection ultrasound images of neurosurgery

PurposeSites that use ultrasound (US) in image-guided neurosurgery (IGNS) of brain tumors generally have three sets of imaging data: preoperative magnetic resonance (MR) image, pre-resection US, and post-resection US. The MR image is usually acquired days before the surgery, the pre-resection US is obtained after the craniotomy but before the resection, and finally, the post-resection US scan is performed after the resection of the tumor. The craniotomy and tumor resection both cause brain deformation, which significantly reduces the accuracy of the MR–US alignment.MethodThree unknown transformations exist between the three sets of imaging data: MR to pre-resection US, pre- to post-resection US, and MR to post-resection US. We use two algorithms that we have recently developed to perform the first two registrations (i.e., MR to pre-resection US and pre- to post-resection US). Regarding the third registration (MR to post-resection US), we evaluate three strategies. The first method performs a registration between the MR and pre-resection US, and another registration between the pre- and post-resection US. It then composes the two transformations to register MR and post-resection US; we call this method compositional registration. The second method ignores the pre-resection US and directly registers the MR and post-resection US; we refer to this method as direct registration. The third method is a combination of the first and second: it uses the solution of the compositional registration as an initial solution for the direct registration method. We call this method group-wise registration.ResultsWe use data from 13 patients provided in the MNI BITE database for all of our analysis. Registration of MR and pre-resection US reduces the average of the mean target registration error (mTRE) from 4.1 to 2.4 mm. Registration of pre- and post-resection US reduces the average mTRE from 3.7 to 1.5 mm. Regarding the registration of MR and post-resection US, all three strategies reduce the mTRE. The initial average mTRE is 5.9 mm, which reduces to 3.3 mm with the compositional method, 2.9 mm with the direct technique, and 2.8 mm with the group-wise method.ConclusionDeformable registration of MR and pre- and post-resection US images significantly improves their alignment. Among the three methods proposed for registering the MR to post-resection US, the group-wise method gives the lowest TRE values. Since the running time of all registration algorithms is less than 2 min on one core of a CPU, they can be integrated into IGNS systems for interactive use during surgery.

[1]  Mary A. Rutherford,et al.  Registration of 3D fetal neurosonography and MRI☆ , 2013, Medical Image Anal..

[2]  David J. Hawkes,et al.  Registration of freehand 3D ultrasound and magnetic resonance liver images , 2004, Medical Image Anal..

[3]  M. Berger,et al.  Coregistration Accuracy and Detection of Brain Shift Using Intraoperative Sononavigation during Resection of Hemispheric Tumors , 2003, Neurosurgery.

[4]  Christopher Nimsky,et al.  Brain shift compensation and neurosurgical image fusion using intraoperative MRI: current status and future challenges. , 2012, Critical reviews in biomedical engineering.

[5]  D. Louis Collins,et al.  Deformable Ultrasound Registration without Reconstruction , 2008, MICCAI.

[6]  G. Unsgaard,et al.  Ability of navigated 3D ultrasound to delineate gliomas and metastases – comparison of image interpretations with histopathology , 2005, Acta Neurochirurgica.

[7]  Frank Lindseth,et al.  A new system for 3D ultrasound-guided placement of cerebral ventricle catheters , 2011, International Journal of Computer Assisted Radiology and Surgery.

[8]  D. Collins,et al.  Online database of clinical MR and ultrasound images of brain tumors. , 2012, Medical physics.

[9]  Keith D. Paulsen,et al.  Retractor-induced brain shift compensation in image-guided neurosurgery , 2013, Medical Imaging.

[10]  Keith D. Paulsen,et al.  Simulation of brain tumor resection in image-guided neurosurgery , 2011, Medical Imaging.

[11]  Yohan Payan,et al.  SOFT TISSUE BIOMECHANICAL MODELING FOR COMPUTER ASSISTED SURGERY: CHALLENGES AND PERSPECTIVES , 2016 .

[12]  Keith D. Paulsen,et al.  Estimation of Intraoperative Brain Deformation , 2012 .

[13]  K. Paulsen,et al.  Intraoperative patient registration using volumetric true 3D ultrasound without fiducials. , 2012, Medical physics.

[14]  Gregory D. Hager,et al.  Real-Time Regularized Ultrasound Elastography , 2011, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging.

[15]  D. Collins,et al.  Automatic 3D Intersubject Registration of MR Volumetric Data in Standardized Talairach Space , 1994, Journal of computer assisted tomography.

[16]  K. Paulsen,et al.  A COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS OF COREGISTERED ULTRASOUND AND MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING IN NEUROSURGERY , 2008, Neurosurgery.

[17]  Xavier Pennec,et al.  Validation of medical image processing in image-guided therapy , 2002 .

[18]  D. Louis Collins,et al.  Comparing two approaches to rigid registration of three-dimensional ultrasound and magnetic resonance images for neurosurgery , 2011, International Journal of Computer Assisted Radiology and Surgery.

[19]  M. Y. Wang,et al.  Measurement of Intraoperative Brain Surface Deformation Under a Craniotomy , 1998, MICCAI.

[20]  Michael Unser,et al.  Fast parametric elastic image registration , 2003, IEEE Trans. Image Process..

[21]  Nicholas Ayache,et al.  Rigid registration of 3-D ultrasound with MR images: a new approach combining intensity and gradient information , 2001, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging.

[22]  Walter A. Hall,et al.  MRI Guidance of Minimally Invasive Cranial Applications , 2011 .

[23]  Keith D. Paulsen,et al.  Optimizing nonrigid registration performance between volumetric true 3D ultrasound images in image-guided neurosurgery , 2011, Medical Imaging.

[24]  Rudolf Fahlbusch,et al.  Feasibility of cervical intramedullary diffuse glioma resection using intraoperative magnetic resonance imaging , 2013, Neurosurgical Review.

[25]  Frank Lindseth,et al.  Ultrasound imaging in neurosurgery: approaches to minimize surgically induced image artefacts for improved resection control , 2013, Acta Neurochirurgica.

[26]  Max A. Viergever,et al.  Brain shift estimation in image-guided neurosurgery using 3-D ultrasound , 2005, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.

[27]  Hassan Rivaz,et al.  Near real-time robust non-rigid registration of volumetric ultrasound images for neurosurgery. , 2015, Ultrasound in medicine & biology.

[28]  P. Black,et al.  From vision to reality: the origins of intraoperative MR imaging. , 2011, Acta neurochirurgica. Supplement.

[29]  K. Paulsen,et al.  Mutual-information-based image to patient re-registration using intraoperative ultrasound in image-guided neurosurgery. , 2008, Medical physics.

[30]  K. Fountas,et al.  Volumetric Assessment of Glioma Removal by Intraoperative High-field Magnetic Resonance Imaging. , 2005, Neurosurgery.

[31]  N. Hata,et al.  Serial Intraoperative Magnetic Resonance Imaging of Brain Shift , 2001, Neurosurgery.

[32]  D. Collins,et al.  Automatic non-linear MRI-ultrasound registration for the correction of intra-operative brain deformations , 2001, International Conference on Medical Image Computing and Computer-Assisted Intervention.

[33]  Michael Buchfelder,et al.  Integration of functional neuronavigation and intraoperative MRI in surgery for drug-resistant extratemporal epilepsy close to eloquent brain areas. , 2013, Neurosurgical focus.

[34]  D. Louis Collins,et al.  Automatic Deformable MR-Ultrasound Registration for Image-Guided Neurosurgery , 2015, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging.

[35]  Ramin Shahidi,et al.  Validation of medical image processing in image-guided therapy , 2002, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging.

[36]  Harald Becher,et al.  Spatio-temporal (2D+T) non-rigid registration of real-time 3D echocardiography and cardiovascular MR image sequences , 2011, Physics in medicine and biology.

[37]  Dorothea Miller,et al.  Stand-alone 3D-ultrasound navigation after failure of conventional image guidance for deep-seated lesions , 2011, Neurosurgical Review.

[38]  Tormod Selbekk,et al.  Comparison of navigated 3D ultrasound findings with histopathology in subsequent phases of glioblastoma resection , 2008, Acta Neurochirurgica.

[39]  J. Patrick Intraoperative Brain Shift and Deformation: A Quantitative Analysis of Cortical Displacement in 28 Cases , 1998 .

[40]  W. Jarmundowicz,et al.  The safety and effectiveness of low field intraoperative MRI guidance in frameless stereotactic biopsies of brain tumours—design and interim analysis of a prospective randomized trial , 2013, Neurosurgical Review.

[41]  Gregory D. Hager,et al.  Ultrasound elastography using multiple images , 2014, Medical Image Anal..