Is Information-Seeking Behavior of Doctoral Students Changing?: A Review of the Literature (2010–2015)

ABSTRACT The advent of the Internet and networked communications in the last 15 years has arguably considerably changed the information behaviors of doctoral students, including the discovery process. Information seeking includes initiating a search, constructing search strategies, and locating and evaluating the identified sources. Current research on information-seeking behaviors is focusing on understanding how the Internet, social media, and other technological and communication-based changes, including mobile technologies, have changed the way students seek information in order to understand the information behaviors of the students of tomorrow. This article offers a review of the literature on information-seeking behaviors, with a particular focus on recent years (2010–2015). It aims to determine whether notable changes in the information-seeking behavior of doctoral students have emerged in recent years. The study shows that the information-seeking behaviors of doctoral students follow a steady trend, with some subtle changes, particularly in the (patchy) use of social media and networking sites. There appears to be more similarities than differences across disciplines in the information-seeking behaviors of doctoral students. Considerations to their information literacy skills are given to understand better the role supervisors and library staff can play to support the doctoral students population in the early stages of the research process.

[1]  Lisa M. Covi Debunking the myth of the Nintendo generation: how doctoral students introduce new electronic communication practices into university research , 2000 .

[2]  M. Prensky Digital Natives, Digital Immigrants Part 1 , 2001 .

[3]  Russell E Glasgow,et al.  If you build it, will they come? , 2002 .

[4]  A. Barrett The information-seeking habits of graduate student researchers in the Humanities , 2005 .

[5]  C. D. Rosa College students' perceptions of libraries and information resources : a report to the OCLC membership , 2005 .

[6]  C. D. Rosa,et al.  Perceptions of libraries and information resources , 2005 .

[7]  M. HamidR.Jamali,et al.  Communication and information-seeking behavior of PhD students in physicists and astronomy , 2006, ASIST.

[8]  A. Swan Who needs libraries anyway? Researchers’ use of academic libraries and their services , 2007 .

[9]  Yan-Chio Liao,et al.  Information-Seeking Behavior of International Graduate Students vs. American Graduate Students: A User Study at Virginia Tech 2005 , 2007 .

[10]  M. HamidR.Jamali,et al.  Information-seeking behaviour of physicists and astronomers , 2008, Aslib Proc..

[11]  Barrie Gunter,et al.  The Google generation: the information behaviour of the researcher of the future , 2008, Aslib Proc..

[12]  Carol Tenopir,et al.  Electronic Journals and Changes in Scholarly Article Seeking and Reading Patterns , 2008, D Lib Mag..

[13]  Enrico Francese Report OCLC 2009: Online Catalogs: what Users and Librarians want , 2009 .

[14]  Ian Rowlands,et al.  Online use and information seeking behaviour: institutional and subject comparisons of UK researchers , 2009, J. Inf. Sci..

[15]  Lei Wu,et al.  Scholarly journal information‐seeking and reading patterns of faculty at five US universities , 2009, Learn. Publ..

[16]  Rachel Lisa Fleming-May,et al.  From Student to Scholar: The Academic Library and Social Sciences PhD Students’ Transformation , 2009 .

[17]  Karen S Calhoun,et al.  Online catalogs : what users and librarians want , 2009 .

[18]  Ian Rowlands,et al.  Researchers’ e-journal use and information seeking behaviour , 2010, J. Inf. Sci..

[19]  Jeanene Light,et al.  Information-seeking behavior of basic science researchers: implications for library services. , 2010, Journal of the Medical Library Association : JMLA.

[20]  Robert Normandeau,et al.  The visitors and the residents , 2010 .

[21]  M. HamidR.Jamali,et al.  Interdisciplinarity and the information-seeking behavior of scientists , 2010, Inf. Process. Manag..

[22]  Bradley M. Hemminger,et al.  National study of information seeking behavior of academic researchers in the United States , 2010, J. Assoc. Inf. Sci. Technol..

[23]  M. HamidR.Jamali,et al.  Google and the scholar: the role of Google in scientists' information-seeking behaviour , 2010, Online Inf. Rev..

[24]  R. Procter,et al.  Adoption and use of Web 2.0 in scholarly communications , 2010, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences.

[25]  Rob Procter,et al.  If you build it, will they come? How researchers perceive and use web 2.0 , 2010 .

[26]  A. Cann,et al.  Social media: a guide for researchers , 2011 .

[27]  Stella Korobili,et al.  Factors that Influence Information-Seeking Behavior: The Case of Greek Graduate Students , 2011 .

[28]  Melissa Terras,et al.  Reinventing Research? Information Practices in the Humanities , 2011 .

[29]  David S. White,et al.  Visitors and Residents: A new typology for online engagement , 2011, First Monday.

[30]  T. Cothran Google Scholar acceptance and use among graduate students: A quantitative study , 2011 .

[31]  Shelagh Keogh,et al.  Social Media: A Guide for Researchers , 2011 .

[32]  Afrodite Malliari,et al.  Exploring the information seeking behavior of Greek graduate students: A case study set in the University of Macedonia , 2011 .

[33]  Gunilla Widén,et al.  Scholarly communication and possible changes in the context of social media: A Finnish case study , 2011, Electron. Libr..

[34]  Ian Rowlands,et al.  Social media use in the research workflow , 2011, Inf. Serv. Use.

[35]  Peter Williams,et al.  Collaborative yet Independent. Information Practices in the Physical Sciences. , 2011 .

[36]  Ming-der Wu,et al.  How graduate students perceive, use, and manage electronic resources , 2012, Aslib Proc..

[37]  Julie Carpenter,et al.  Researchers of Tomorrow: The research behaviour of Generation Y doctoral students , 2012, Inf. Serv. Use.

[38]  Barbara Blummer,et al.  The Research Experience for Education Graduate Students: A Phenomenographic Study , 2012 .

[39]  Bradley M. Hemminger,et al.  A study of factors that affect the information-seeking behavior of academic scientists , 2012, J. Assoc. Inf. Sci. Technol..

[40]  Carol Tenopir,et al.  Scholarly Reading and the Value of Academic Library Collections: results of a study in six UK universities , 2012 .

[41]  Mohd Rafiz Salji,et al.  Information Seeking Behavior , 2012 .

[42]  Cecelia Brown,et al.  Ensuring Chinese Engineering Graduate Students' Academic Success: A Study at the University of Oklahoma , 2012 .

[43]  Edwin Horlings,et al.  Search strategies along the academic lifecycle , 2012, Scientometrics.

[44]  Don MacMillan Mendeley: teaching scholarly communication and collaboration through social networking , 2012 .

[45]  Ruth N. Bolton,et al.  Understanding Generation Y and their use of social media: a review and research agenda , 2013 .

[46]  Edrick G. Coppock,et al.  Status of the adoption of social media in the scientific research community , 2013, Inf. Serv. Use.

[47]  Laura Maquignaz How Readers Discover Content in Scholarly Journals: Comparing the Changing User Behaviour between 2005 and 2012 and its Impact on Publisher Web Site Design and Function , 2013 .

[48]  Ángel Borrego,et al.  Use of social networks for academic purposes: a case study , 2013, Electron. Libr..

[49]  Simon Inger,et al.  Library technology in content discovery – evidence from a large-scale reader survey , 2013 .

[50]  Amy Catalano,et al.  Patterns of graduate students' information seeking behavior: a meta-synthesis of the literature , 2013, J. Documentation.

[51]  Vincent Larivière,et al.  In their own image? a comparison of doctoral students' and faculty members' referencing behavior , 2013, J. Assoc. Inf. Sci. Technol..

[52]  Lynn Silipigni Connaway,et al.  Visitors and residents: what motivates engagement with the digital information environment? , 2011, Inf. Res..

[53]  Marg Sloan,et al.  Information Seeking in Context: Results of Graduate Student Interviews , 2013 .

[54]  Kyung-Sun Kim,et al.  Information seeking through social media: Impact of user characteristics on social media use , 2013, ASIST.

[55]  Serlie B. Jamias,et al.  Scientists' use of social media: The case of researchers at the University of the Philippines Los Baños , 2013, First Monday.

[56]  Mike Thelwall,et al.  Academia.edu: Social network or Academic Network? , 2014, J. Assoc. Inf. Sci. Technol..

[57]  Remigiusz Sapa,et al.  Information seeking behaviour of mathematicians: scientists and students , 2014, Inf. Res..

[58]  Ronan Madden Information behaviour of humanities PhDs on an information literacy course , 2014 .

[59]  Ming-der Wu,et al.  Graduate students appreciate Google Scholar, but still find use for libraries , 2014, Electron. Libr..

[60]  The Impact of RDS on Usage of Electronic Content in UK Academic Libraries: Selected Results from a UKSG-Funded Project , 2015 .

[61]  Rodrigo Costas,et al.  The thematic orientation of publications mentioned on social media: Large-scale disciplinary comparison of social media metrics with citations , 2015, Aslib J. Inf. Manag..

[62]  Svanhild Aabø,et al.  The information practices of Business PhD students , 2015 .

[63]  Carol Tenopir,et al.  Scholarly article seeking, reading, and use: a continuing evolution from print to electronic in the sciences and social sciences , 2015, Learn. Publ..

[64]  Vincent Larivière,et al.  Who reads research articles? An altmetrics analysis of Mendeley user categories , 2015, J. Assoc. Inf. Sci. Technol..

[65]  Steve G. Probets,et al.  Towards an understanding of the relationship between disciplinary research cultures and open access repository behaviors , 2016, J. Assoc. Inf. Sci. Technol..

[66]  Carol Tenopir,et al.  Trustworthiness and authority of scholarly information in a digital age: Results of an international questionnaire , 2016, J. Assoc. Inf. Sci. Technol..

[67]  Simon Inger,et al.  How readers discover content in scholarly publications , 2016, Inf. Serv. Use.

[68]  Towards an understanding of the relationship , 2017 .