Analysing GCN4 translational control in yeast by stochastic chemical kinetics modelling and simulation

BackgroundThe yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae responds to amino acid starvation by inducing the transcription factor Gcn4. This is mainly mediated via a translational control mechanism dependent upon the translation initiation eIF2·GTP·Met-tRNAiMet ternary complex, and the four short upstream open reading frames (uORFs) in its 5' mRNA leader. These uORFs act to attenuate GCN4 mRNA translation under normal conditions. During amino acid starvation, levels of ternary complex are reduced. This overcomes the GCN4 translation attenuation effect via a scanning/reinitiation control mechanism dependent upon uORF spacing.ResultsUsing published experimental data, we have developed and validated a probabilistic formulation of GCN4 translation using the Chemical Master Equation (Model 1). Model 1 explains GCN4 translation's nonlinear dependency upon uORF placements, and predicts that an as yet unidentified factor, which was proposed to regulate GCN4 translation under some conditions, only has pronounced effects upon GCN4 translation when intercistronic distances are unnaturally short. A simpler Model 2 that does not include this unidentified factor could well represent the regulation of a natural GCN4 mRNA. Using parameter values optimised for this algebraic Model 2, we performed stochastic simulations by Gillespie algorithm to investigate the distribution of ribosomes in different sections of GCN4 mRNA under distinct conditions. Our simulations demonstrated that ribosomal loading in the 5'-untranslated region is mainly determined by the ratio between the rates of 5'-initiation and ribosome scanning, but was not significantly affected by rate of ternary complex binding. Importantly, the translation rate for codons starved of cognate tRNAs is predicted to be the most significant contributor to the changes in ribosomal loading in the coding region under repressing and derepressing conditions.ConclusionsOur integrated probabilistic Models 1 and 2 explained GCN4 translation and helped to elucidate the role of a yet unidentified factor. The ensuing stochastic simulations evaluated different factors that may impact on the translation of GCN4 mRNA, and integrated translation status with ribosomal density.

[1]  M. Kozak,et al.  Pushing the limits of the scanning mechanism for initiation of translation , 2002, Gene.

[2]  Mikkel A. Algire,et al.  Development and characterization of a reconstituted yeast translation initiation system. , 2002, RNA.

[3]  K. Asano,et al.  The Eukaryotic Initiation Factor (eIF) 4G HEAT Domain Promotes Translation Re-initiation in Yeast Both Dependent on and Independent of eIF4A mRNA Helicase* , 2010, The Journal of Biological Chemistry.

[4]  Daniel Herschlag,et al.  Dissecting eukaryotic translation and its control by ribosome density mapping , 2005, Nucleic acids research.

[5]  R. Wek,et al.  Phosphorylation of eIF2 Facilitates Ribosomal Bypass of an Inhibitory Upstream ORF to Enhance CHOP Translation*♦ , 2011, The Journal of Biological Chemistry.

[6]  Xin Yao,et al.  Search biases in constrained evolutionary optimization , 2005, IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics, Part C (Applications and Reviews).

[7]  A. Hinnebusch,et al.  Domains of eIF1A that mediate binding to eIF2, eIF3 and eIF5B and promote ternary complex recruitment in vivo , 2003, The EMBO journal.

[8]  James R Broach,et al.  How Saccharomyces responds to nutrients. , 2008, Annual review of genetics.

[9]  M. Kozak,et al.  Regulation of translation via mRNA structure in prokaryotes and eukaryotes. , 2005, Gene.

[10]  A. Hinnebusch,et al.  A multifactor complex of eukaryotic initiation factors, eIF1, eIF2, eIF3, eIF5, and initiator tRNA(Met) is an important translation initiation intermediate in vivo. , 2000, Genes & development.

[11]  Mikkel A. Algire,et al.  The eukaryotic translation initiation factors eIF1 and eIF1A induce an open conformation of the 40S ribosome. , 2007, Molecular cell.

[12]  D. Gillespie.  A General Method for Numerically Simulating the Stochastic Time Evolution of Coupled Chemical Reactions , 1976 .

[13]  Nicholas T. Ingolia,et al.  Genome-Wide Analysis in Vivo of Translation with Nucleotide Resolution Using Ribosome Profiling , 2009, Science.

[14]  M. Marton,et al.  Transcriptional Profiling Shows that Gcn4p Is a Master Regulator of Gene Expression during Amino Acid Starvation in Yeast , 2001, Molecular and Cellular Biology.

[15]  Tsuyoshi Udagawa,et al.  Change in nutritional status modulates the abundance of critical pre-initiation intermediate complexes during translation initiation in vivo. , 2007, Journal of molecular biology.

[16]  A. Hinnebusch,et al.  eIF3a cooperates with sequences 5' of uORF1 to promote resumption of scanning by post-termination ribosomes for reinitiation on GCN4 mRNA. , 2008, Genes & development.

[17]  A. Hinnebusch.  Translational regulation of GCN4 and the general amino acid control of yeast. , 2005, Annual review of microbiology.

[18]  A. Hinnebusch,et al.  Requirements for intercistronic distance and level of eukaryotic initiation factor 2 activity in reinitiation on GCN4 mRNA vary with the downstream cistron , 1994, Molecular and cellular biology.

[19]  C. Rodrigues-Pousada,et al.  The yeast transcription factor genes YAP1 and YAP2 are subject to differential control at the levels of both translation and mRNA stability. , 1998, Nucleic acids research.

[20]  G. Coghill,et al.  A quantitative model for mRNA translation in Saccharomyces cerevisiae , 2010, Yeast.

[21]  N. Hoyle,et al.  Stress-dependent relocalization of translationally primed mRNPs to cytoplasmic granules that are kinetically and spatially distinct from P-bodies , 2007, The Journal of cell biology.

[22]  G. Coghill,et al.  A quantitative model for the translational control of GCN4 in yeast , 2007 .

[23]  A. Hinnebusch,et al.  Modulation of tRNA(iMet), eIF-2, and eIF-2B expression shows that GCN4 translation is inversely coupled to the level of eIF-2.GTP.Met-tRNA(iMet) ternary complexes , 1995, Molecular and cellular biology.

[24]  A. Hinnebusch,et al.  Physical evidence for distinct mechanisms of translational control by upstream open reading frames , 2001, The EMBO journal.

[25]  Eytan Domany,et al.  An exact solution of a one-dimensional asymmetric exclusion model with open boundaries , 1992 .

[26]  Mark Muldoon,et al.  Dynamics and processivity of 40S ribosome scanning on mRNA in yeast , 2004, Molecular microbiology.

[27]  Andreas Wagner,et al.  A model of protein translation including codon bias, nonsense errors, and ribosome recycling. , 2006, Journal of theoretical biology.

[28]  Celso Grebogi,et al.  Queueing phase transition: theory of translation. , 2009, Physical review letters.

[29]  John D. Storey,et al.  Precision and functional specificity in mRNA decay , 2002, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[30]  N. Jones,et al.  Int6/eIF3e Promotes General Translation and Atf1 Abundance to Modulate Sty1 MAPK-dependent Stress Response in Fission Yeast* , 2008, Journal of Biological Chemistry.

[31]  H. Lodish,et al.  A kinetic model of protein synthesis. Application to hemoglobin synthesis and translational control. , 1979, The Journal of biological chemistry.