Using the American College of Radiology Dose Index Registry to Evaluate Practice Patterns and Radiation Dose Estimates of Pediatric Body CT.

OBJECTIVE Imaging registries afford opportunities to study large, heterogeneous populations. The purpose of this study was to examine the American College of Radiology CT Dose Index Registry (DIR) for dose-related demographics and metrics of common pediatric body CT examinations. MATERIALS AND METHODS Single-phase CT examinations of the abdomen and pelvis and chest submitted to the DIR over a 5-year period (July 2011-June 2016) were evaluated (head CT frequency was also collected). CT examinations were stratified into five age groups, and examination frequency was determined across age and sex. Standard dose indexes (volume CT dose index, dose-length product, and size-specific dose estimate) were categorized by body part and age. Contributions to the DIR were also categorized by region and practice type. RESULTS Over the study period 411,655 single-phase pediatric examinations of the abdomen and pelvis, chest, and head, constituting 5.7% of the total (adult and pediatric) examinations, were submitted to the DIR. Head CT was the most common examination across all age groups. The majority of all scan types were performed for patients in the second decade of life. Dose increased for all scan types as age increased; the dose for abdominopelvic CT was the highest in each age group. Even though the DIR was queried for single-phase examinations only, as many as 32.4% of studies contained multiple irradiation events. When these additional scans were included, the volume CT dose index for each scan type increased. Among the studies in the DIR, 99.8% came from institutions within the United States. Community practices and those that specialize in pediatrics were nearly equally represented. CONCLUSION The DIR provides valuable information about practice patterns and dose trends for pediatric CT and may assist in establishing diagnostic reference levels in the pediatric population.

[1]  Richard L Morin,et al.  The ACR Computed Tomography Dose Index Registry: the 5 million examination update. , 2013, Journal of the American College of Radiology : JACR.

[2]  Ehsan Samei,et al.  Implementation of the ACR Dose Index Registry. , 2015, Journal of the American College of Radiology : JACR.

[3]  Icrp Recommendations of the International Commission on Radiological Protection Publication 60 , 1991 .

[4]  D. Bardo,et al.  Size-appropriate radiation doses in pediatric body CT: a study of regional community adoption in the United States , 2013, Pediatric Radiology.

[5]  O. Linton,et al.  NCRP REPORT NO. 160, IONIZING RADIATION EXPOSURE OF THE POPULATION OF THE UNITED STATES, MEDICAL EXPOSURE—ARE WE DOING LESS WITH MORE, AND IS THERE A ROLE FOR HEALTH PHYSICISTS? , 2009, Health physics.

[6]  D. Larson,et al.  Diagnostic reference ranges for pediatric abdominal CT. , 2013, Radiology.

[7]  David Zurakowski,et al.  Has pediatric CT at children's hospitals reached its peak? , 2010, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[8]  Donald L. Miller,et al.  Radiation Protection and Dose Monitoring in Medical Imaging: A Journey From Awareness, Through Accountability, Ability and Action…But Where Will We Arrive? , 2013, Journal of patient safety.

[9]  D. Miglioretti,et al.  Radiation dose associated with common computed tomography examinations and the associated lifetime attributable risk of cancer. , 2009, Archives of internal medicine.

[10]  Richard L Morin,et al.  ACR Dose Index Registry. , 2011, Journal of the American College of Radiology : JACR.

[11]  Jenia Vassileva,et al.  Diagnostic reference levels. , 2015, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[12]  Harlan M Krumholz,et al.  Use of medical imaging procedures with ionizing radiation in children: a population-based study. , 2011, Archives of pediatrics & adolescent medicine.

[13]  J. Boone,et al.  Radiation Doses in Consecutive CT Examinations from Five University of California Medical Centers. , 2015, Radiology.

[14]  Yong Zhou,et al.  Use of a dedicated pediatric CT imaging service associated with decreased patient radiation dose. , 2012, Journal of the American College of Radiology : JACR.

[15]  D. Larson,et al.  National trends in CT use in the emergency department: 1995-2007. , 2011, Radiology.

[16]  A. Primak,et al.  Estimated Patient Dose Indexes in Adult and Pediatric MDCT: Comparison of Automatic Tube Voltage Selection With Fixed Tube Current, Fixed Tube Voltage, and Weight-Based Protocols. , 2015, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[17]  M. Bhargavan-Chatfield,et al.  Variation in Pediatric Cervical Spine Computed Tomography Radiation Dose Index. , 2015, Academic emergency medicine : official journal of the Society for Academic Emergency Medicine.

[18]  Daniel A. Hirsh,et al.  Trends in Computed Tomography Utilization in the Pediatric Emergency Department , 2012, Pediatrics.

[19]  M. Callahan,et al.  CT dose reduction in practice , 2011, Pediatric Radiology.

[20]  E. S. Amis,et al.  Evaluating an Image Gently and Image Wisely Campaign in a Multihospital Health Care System. , 2016, Journal of the American College of Radiology : JACR.

[21]  Image Gently: toward optimizing the practice of pediatric CT through resources and dialogue , 2015, Pediatric Radiology.

[22]  Mervyn D. Cohen,et al.  ALARA, Image Gently and CT-induced cancer , 2015, Pediatric Radiology.

[23]  Donald P. Frush,et al.  The ‘Image Gently’ campaign: increasing CT radiation dose awareness through a national education and awareness program , 2008, Pediatric Radiology.

[24]  G. Hewitt,et al.  Acute and chronic pelvic pain in female adolescents. , 2000, The Medical clinics of North America.

[25]  C A Kelsey,et al.  CT scanning: patterns of use and dose , 2000, Journal of radiological protection : official journal of the Society for Radiological Protection.

[26]  Sheila Weinmann,et al.  The use of computed tomography in pediatrics and the associated radiation exposure and estimated cancer risk. , 2013, JAMA pediatrics.

[27]  Ehsan Samei,et al.  Automated size-specific CT dose monitoring program: assessing variability in CT dose. , 2012, Medical physics.

[28]  R. Morin,et al.  U.S. Diagnostic Reference Levels and Achievable Doses for 10 Adult CT Examinations. , 2017, Radiology.

[29]  S. Agarwal,et al.  Pediatric Emergency CT Scans at a Children's Hospital and at Community Hospitals: Radiation Technical Factors Are an Important Source of Radiation Exposure. , 2015, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.