Effects of an interactive tailored patient assessment on patient–clinician communication in cancer care

To test the effect of Choice, an interactive tailored patient assessment (ITPA) tool on the number and types of symptoms addressed during consultations with cancer patients, cancer patients' active participation during consultation with clinicians, and clinicians' responses.

[1]  E. Bruera,et al.  Current Trends in Cancer Pain Management , 2006 .

[2]  Cornelia M. Ruland,et al.  Research Paper: Effects of a Computerized System to Support Shared Decision Making in Symptom Management of Cancer Patients: Preliminary Results , 2003, J. Am. Medical Informatics Assoc..

[3]  N. Aaronson,et al.  How are you feeling? Who wants to know? Patients' and oncologists' preferences for discussing health-related quality-of-life issues. , 2000, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[4]  J. Gralow,et al.  Cancer Symptom Control: Feasibility of a Tailored, Interactive Computerized Program for Patients , 2001, Family & community health.

[5]  F B Lammes,et al.  Doctor-patient communication and cancer patients' quality of life and satisfaction. , 2000, Patient education and counseling.

[6]  Alejandro R Jadad,et al.  What patients with cancer want to know about pain: a qualitative study. , 2008, Journal of pain and symptom management.

[7]  D. Watson,et al.  Development and validation of brief measures of positive and negative affect: the PANAS scales. , 1988, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[8]  P. Lachenbruch Statistical Power Analysis for the Behavioral Sciences (2nd ed.) , 1989 .

[9]  Cornelia M Ruland,et al.  Effects of an interactive tailored patient assessment tool on eliciting and responding to cancer patients' cues and concerns in clinical consultations with physicians and nurses. , 2012, Patient education and counseling.

[10]  P. Butow,et al.  Promoting patient participation and shortening cancer consultations: a randomised trial , 2001, British Journal of Cancer.

[11]  Seth Wolpin,et al.  Acceptability of an Electronic Self-report Assessment Program for Patients With Cancer , 2008, Computers, informatics, nursing : CIN.

[12]  Michelle R. Hribar,et al.  Developing an easy-to-use tablet computer application for assessing patient-reported outcomes in patients with cancer , 2011, Supportive Care in Cancer.

[13]  M. Parle,et al.  The development of a training model to improve health professionals' skills, self-efficacy and outcome expectancies when communicating with cancer patients. , 1997, Social science & medicine.

[14]  P. Maguire,et al.  The relationship between patients' concerns and psychological distress in a hospice setting , 1998, Psycho-oncology.

[15]  C. Marci,et al.  Physiologic Correlates of Perceived Therapist Empathy and Social-Emotional Process During Psychotherapy , 2007, The Journal of nervous and mental disease.

[16]  L. Radbruch,et al.  Symptoms during cancer pain treatment following WHO-guidelines: a longitudinal follow-up study of symptom prevalence, severity and etiology , 2001, Pain.

[17]  M. Fox,et al.  A systematic review of the literature reporting on studies that examined the impact of interactive, computer-based patient education programs. , 2009, Patient education and counseling.

[18]  P. Butow,et al.  Oncologists' reactions to cancer patients' verbal cues , 2002, Psycho-oncology.

[19]  L. Oldervoll,et al.  A first step in the development of an international self-report instrument for physical functioning in palliative cancer care: a systematic literature review and an expert opinion evaluation study. , 2009, Journal of pain and symptom management.

[20]  Amy P Abernethy,et al.  Improving health care efficiency and quality using tablet personal computers to collect research-quality, patient-reported data. , 2008, Health services research.

[21]  D. Roter,et al.  The Roter interaction analysis system (RIAS): utility and flexibility for analysis of medical interactions. , 2002, Patient education and counseling.

[22]  S. Bannister,et al.  A Qualitative Study , 2009 .

[23]  P. Cardon,et al.  A qualitative study. , 2001 .

[24]  Jacob Cohen Statistical Power Analysis for the Behavioral Sciences , 1969, The SAGE Encyclopedia of Research Design.

[25]  Jo Røislien,et al.  Reliability and Validity Issues Related to Interactive Tailored Patient Assessments: A Case Study , 2007, Journal of medical Internet research.

[26]  N K Aaronson,et al.  The patient-physician relationship. Patient-physician communication during outpatient palliative treatment visits: an observational study. , 2001, JAMA.

[27]  V. Entwistle,et al.  Interventions for providers to promote a patient-centred approach in clinical consultations (Review) , 2018 .

[28]  J. de Haes,et al.  Doctor-patient communication: a review of the literature. , 1995, Social science & medicine.

[29]  M. Holmes-Rovner,et al.  Interventions for providers to promote a patient-centred approach in clinical consultations. , 2002, The Cochrane database of systematic reviews.

[30]  Cornelia M. Ruland,et al.  Effects of a computer-supported interactive tailored patient assessment tool on patient care, symptom distress, and patients' need for symptom management support: a randomized clinical trial , 2010, J. Am. Medical Informatics Assoc..

[31]  Cornelia M. Ruland,et al.  Research Paper: Handheld Technology to Improve Patient Care: Evaluating a Support System for Preference-based Care Planning at the Bedside , 2002, J. Am. Medical Informatics Assoc..

[32]  Peter Salmon,et al.  Coding patient emotional cues and concerns in medical consultations: the Verona coding definitions of emotional sequences (VR-CoDES). , 2011, Patient education and counseling.

[33]  R. Portenoy,et al.  Management of cancer pain , 1999, The Lancet.