A novel objective method for assessing high‐contrast spatial resolution in CT based on the Rayleigh criterion
暂无分享,去创建一个
Pu Zhang | Wenli Liu | Guangzhi Wang | Guoqing Wan | Xingdong Li | Fei Li
[1] Christian Steiding,et al. A quality assurance framework for the fully automated and objective evaluation of image quality in cone-beam computed tomography. , 2014, Medical physics.
[2] R L Morin,et al. A practical method to measure the MTF of CT scanners. , 1982, Medical physics.
[3] Thomas Martin Deserno,et al. Survey: interpolation methods in medical image processing , 1999, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging.
[4] Michael Elad,et al. Fast and robust multiframe super resolution , 2004, IEEE Transactions on Image Processing.
[5] E Samei,et al. Assessment of multi-directional MTF for breast tomosynthesis , 2013, Physics in medicine and biology.
[6] Kunio Doi,et al. A simple method for determining the modulation transfer function in digital radiography , 1992, IEEE Trans. Medical Imaging.
[7] Cynthia H McCollough,et al. Quality assurance for computed-tomography simulators and the computed-tomography-simulation process: report of the AAPM Radiation Therapy Committee Task Group No. 66. , 2003, Medical physics.
[8] Ken Turkowski,et al. Filters for common resampling tasks , 1990 .
[9] K. Rossmann. Point spread-function, line spread-function, and modulation transfer function. Tools for the study of imaging systems. , 1969, Radiology.
[10] E. Samei,et al. A method for measuring the presampled MTF of digital radiographic systems using an edge test device. , 1998, Medical physics.
[11] J M Boone,et al. Determination of the presampled MTF in computed tomography. , 2001, Medical physics.
[12] Raymond P. Rossi,et al. Specification and Acceptance Testing of Computed Tomography Scanners , 1993 .
[13] Yuval Garini,et al. From micro to nano: recent advances in high-resolution microscopy. , 2005, Current opinion in biotechnology.
[14] Jiming Liu,et al. Estimating the sample mean and standard deviation from the sample size, median, range and/or interquartile range , 2014, BMC Medical Research Methodology.
[15] Moon Gi Kang,et al. Super-resolution image reconstruction: a technical overview , 2003, IEEE Signal Process. Mag..
[16] I A Cunningham,et al. Signal and noise in modulation transfer function determinations using the slit, wire, and edge techniques. , 1992, Medical physics.
[17] C Ritter,et al. Evaluation of the optimal image reconstruction interval for coronary artery imaging using 64-slice computed tomography , 2007, Acta radiologica.
[18] J. Boone,et al. Evaluation of the spatial resolution characteristics of a cone-beam breast CT scanner. , 2006, Medical physics.
[19] S. Shibu,et al. SUPER-RESOLUTION IMAGE RECONSTRUCTION USING HIGH PERFORMANCE COMPUTING , 2012 .
[20] Julian L Wichmann,et al. Assessment of colorectal liver metastases using MRI and CT: impact of observer experience on diagnostic performance and inter-observer reproducibility with histopathological correlation. , 2014, European journal of radiology.
[21] Seung Hyup Kim,et al. The Relationship between Subjective and Objective Parameters in CT Phantom Image Evaluation , 2009, Korean journal of radiology.
[22] Patrick C. Brennan,et al. Optimization of Computed Tomography Protocols: Limitations of a Methodology Employing a Phantom with Location-Known Opacities , 2013, Journal of Digital Imaging.