Single-trial detection of EEG error-related potentials using modified power-law transformation

Abstract Error processing in the human brain is characterized by a distinct neural response that is elicited when the outcome of an event is not the same as expected. This response is known as error-related potential (ErrP). Detection of error-related potentials from a single-trial data can lead the existing Brain-Computer Interface (BCI) systems one step closer to autonomous system. The non-stationarity of the Electroencephalograph (EEG) signal along with poor spatial resolution and low signal-to-noise ratio make the task of detecting ErrP on a single-trial basis challenging. The objective of this work is to propose a novel ErrP detection method based on temporal domain features of ErrP, particularly, the standard deviation measure. The difference in the standard deviation between the correct and the erroneous trials is verified using a statistical test and this information is subsequently used for ErrP detection. In the proposed method, the EEG electrodes from the frontocentral region of the brain are ranked using standard deviation based ranking criterion and a few top-ranked electrodes will be considered for single-trial detection of ErrP. Then, a modified power-law based transformation is proposed to enhance the discriminability between the correct and error trials. The discriminability is enhanced by transforming the samples lying outside a predefined amplitude range according to power-law equation and the samples within the selected amplitude range are transformed linearly. The modified power-law transformation has two parameters K and γ. The parameter K defines the pre-defined amplitude range and γ is the power in the standard power-law equation. The proposed ErrP detection method is tested on a publicly available EEG database of 10 subjects. The proposed transformation increases the discriminability between the erroneous and correct trials and achieves the best trade-off between the sensitivity and the specificity for detecting ErrP on single-trial basis compared to existing methods. The average sensitivity and specificity achieved is 86.17 ± 9.05 % and 92.05 ± 3.69 % respectively. The higher sensitivity of detection erroneous trials can be used to faithfully correct the wrongly decoded signal in the EEG based BCI system.

[1]  Tom Chau,et al.  Improving bit rate in an auditory BCI: Exploiting error-related potentials , 2016 .

[2]  A. Buttfield,et al.  Towards a robust BCI: error potentials and online learning , 2006, IEEE Transactions on Neural Systems and Rehabilitation Engineering.

[3]  Yiannis Kompatsiaris,et al.  A Collaborative Representation Approach to Detecting Error-Related Potentials in SSVEP-BCIs , 2017, ACM Multimedia.

[4]  Lucian Gheorghe,et al.  Improved recognition of error related potentials through the use of brain connectivity features , 2012, 2012 Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society.

[5]  Urbano J. Nunes,et al.  Double ErrP Detection for Automatic Error Correction in an ERP-Based BCI Speller , 2018, IEEE Transactions on Neural Systems and Rehabilitation Engineering.

[6]  Stefan Haufe,et al.  Single-trial analysis and classification of ERP components — A tutorial , 2011, NeuroImage.

[7]  John J. B. Allen,et al.  Theta lingua franca: a common mid-frontal substrate for action monitoring processes. , 2012, Psychophysiology.

[8]  Siobhán Harty,et al.  Towards error categorisation in BCI: single-trial EEG classification between different errors , 2019, Journal of neural engineering.

[9]  Gernot R. Müller-Putz,et al.  Online asynchronous decoding of error-related potentials during the continuous control of a robot , 2019, Scientific Reports.

[10]  D. V. Cramon,et al.  Subprocesses of Performance Monitoring: A Dissociation of Error Processing and Response Competition Revealed by Event-Related fMRI and ERPs , 2001, NeuroImage.

[11]  Leonardo S. Mattos,et al.  Does tactile feedback enhance single-trial detection of error-related eeg potentials? , 2017, 2017 IEEE International Conference on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics (SMC).

[12]  Rafael C. González,et al.  Digital image processing using MATLAB , 2006 .

[13]  Mohammad Khalid,et al.  Synthesis of polyvinyl alcohol (PVA) infiltrated MWCNTs buckypaper for strain sensing application , 2018, Scientific Reports.

[14]  Lin Gao,et al.  A Review of Error-Related Potential-Based Brain–Computer Interfaces for Motor Impaired People , 2019, IEEE Access.

[15]  Gordon Cheng,et al.  Calibration-Free Error-Related Potential Decoding With Adaptive Subject-Independent Models: A Comparative Study , 2020, IEEE Transactions on Medical Robotics and Bionics.

[16]  D. Kumar,et al.  Power-law transformation for enhanced recognition of born-digital word images , 2012, 2012 International Conference on Signal Processing and Communications (SPCOM).

[17]  Lei Ding,et al.  Combining multiple features for error detection and its application in brain–computer interface , 2016, Biomedical engineering online.

[18]  Guillaume Gibert,et al.  xDAWN Algorithm to Enhance Evoked Potentials: Application to Brain–Computer Interface , 2009, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.

[19]  Emanuel Donchin,et al.  The Error-Related Negativity , 2018, Perspectives on psychological science : a journal of the Association for Psychological Science.

[20]  Su Jian,et al.  An Image Enhancement Method Based on Gamma Correction , 2009, 2009 Second International Symposium on Computational Intelligence and Design.

[21]  Vivek K. Bajpai,et al.  Antioxidant efficacy and the upregulation of Nrf2-mediated HO-1 expression by (+)-lariciresinol, a lignan isolated from Rubia philippinensis, through the activation of p38 , 2017, Scientific Reports.

[22]  Frank Kirchner,et al.  Intrinsic interactive reinforcement learning – Using error-related potentials for real world human-robot interaction , 2017, Scientific Reports.

[23]  Ricardo Chavarriaga,et al.  Errare machinale est: the use of error-related potentials in brain-machine interfaces , 2014, Front. Neurosci..

[24]  A. Reif,et al.  Reliable and efficient recording of the error-related negativity with a speeded Eriksen Flanker Task , 2018, Acta Neuropsychiatrica.

[25]  M. Herrmann,et al.  Source localization (LORETA) of the error-related-negativity (ERN/Ne) and positivity (Pe). , 2004, Brain research. Cognitive brain research.

[26]  Ioannis Kompatsiaris,et al.  An error-aware gaze-based keyboard by means of a hybrid BCI system , 2018, Scientific Reports.

[27]  Mahnaz Arvaneh,et al.  Improving EEG-based error detection using relative peak features , 2020, 2020 42nd Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine & Biology Society (EMBC).

[28]  Arab Ali Chérif,et al.  EEG error potentials detection and classification using time-frequency features for robot reinforcement learning , 2015, 2015 37th Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society (EMBC).

[29]  Ricardo Chavarriaga,et al.  Teaching brain-machine interfaces as an alternative paradigm to neuroprosthetics control , 2015, Scientific Reports.

[30]  Ricardo Chavarriaga,et al.  Spatial filters yield stable features for error-related potentials across conditions , 2016, 2016 IEEE International Conference on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics (SMC).

[31]  Elsa Andrea Kirchner,et al.  Handling Few Training Data: Classifier Transfer Between Different Types of Error-Related Potentials , 2016, IEEE Transactions on Neural Systems and Rehabilitation Engineering.