The Evolution of Cooperation in a Lattice-Structured Population

The evolution of cooperation among unrelated individuals is studied in a lattice-structured habitat, where individuals interact locally only with their neighbors. The initial population includes Tit-for-Tat (abbreviated as TFT, indicating a cooperative strategy) and All Defect (AD, a selfish strategy) distributed randomly over the lattice points. Each individual plays the iterated Prisoner’s Dilemma game with its nearest neighbors, and its total pay-off determines its instantaneous mortality. After the death of an individual, the site is replaced immediately by a copy of a randomly chosen neighbor. Mathematical analyses based on mean-field approximation, pair approximation, and computer simulation are applied. Models on one and two-dimensional regular square lattices are examined and compared with the complete mixing model. Results are: (1) In the one-dimensional model, TFT players come to form tight clusters. As the probability of iteration w increases, TFTs become more likely to spread. The condition for TFT to increase is predicted accurately by pair approximation but not by mean-field approximation. (2) If w is sufficiently large, TFT can invade and spread in an AD population, which is impossible in the complete mixing model where AD is always ESS. This is also confirmed by the invasion probability analysis. (3) The two-dimensional lattice model behaves somewhat in between the one-dimensional model and the complete mixing model. (4) The spatial structure modifies the condition for the evolution of cooperation in two different ways: it facilitates the evolution of cooperation due to spontaneously formed positive correlation between neighbors, but it also inhibits cooperation because of the advantage of being spiteful by killing neighbors and then replacing them. 7 1997 Academic Press Limited

[1]  Henry Hamburger,et al.  N‐person Prisoner's Dilemma† , 1973 .

[2]  Lawrence Gray,et al.  The positive rates problem for attractive nearest neighbor spin systems on ℤ , 1982 .

[3]  M. Nowak,et al.  Tit for tat in heterogeneous populations , 1992, Nature.

[4]  M. Nowak,et al.  A strategy of win-stay, lose-shift that outperforms tit-for-tat in the Prisoner's Dilemma game , 1993, Nature.

[5]  W. Hamilton,et al.  The evolution of cooperation. , 1984, Science.

[6]  Simon A. Levin,et al.  Stochastic Spatial Models: A User's Guide to Ecological Applications , 1994 .

[7]  R. Boyd Mistakes allow evolutionary stability in the repeated prisoner's dilemma game. , 1989, Journal of theoretical biology.

[8]  Thomas M. Liggett,et al.  Attractive Nearest Neighbor Spin Systems on the Integers , 1978 .

[9]  R. Boyd,et al.  No pure strategy is evolutionarily stable in the repeated Prisoner's Dilemma game , 1987, Nature.

[10]  David W. Stephens,et al.  Error and Discounting in the Iterated Prisoner's Dilemma , 1995 .

[11]  M. Nowak,et al.  Evolutionary games and spatial chaos , 1992, Nature.

[12]  William J. Hamilton,et al.  Darwinism and Human Affairs , 1982 .

[13]  Rick Durrett,et al.  On the Growth of One Dimensional Contact Processes , 1980 .

[14]  Akira Sasaki,et al.  Statistical Mechanics of Population: The Lattice Lotka-Volterra Model , 1992 .

[15]  Akira Sasaki,et al.  Pathogen invasion and host extinction in lattice structured populations , 1994, Journal of mathematical biology.

[16]  G. Wilkinson Reciprocal food sharing in the vampire bat , 1984, Nature.

[17]  R. Durrett,et al.  The Importance of Being Discrete (and Spatial) , 1994 .

[18]  Hal Caswell,et al.  Ecological Interactions in Patchy Environments: From Patch-Occupancy Models to Cellular Automata , 1992 .

[19]  Y. Iwasa,et al.  Population persistence and spatially limited social interaction. , 1995, Theoretical population biology.

[20]  A. Sasaki,et al.  A Lattice Model for Population Biology , 1987 .

[21]  A. Pusey Chimpanzee Politics: Power and Sex among Apes, France de Waal. Harper & Row, New York (1982), 223, Price $16.50 , 1984 .

[22]  R. Trivers The Evolution of Reciprocal Altruism , 1971, The Quarterly Review of Biology.

[23]  W. Hamilton The genetical evolution of social behaviour. I. , 1964, Journal of theoretical biology.