Friction based semi-active control of cable-stayed bridges

With the rapid increase of bridge spans, research on controlling earthquake-induced vibration of long-span bridges has been a problem of great concern. The concept of varying the normal force in a frictional interface is investigated to enhance the energy dissipation from a vibrating structure and improve the seismic performance of bridge structures. A semi-active optimal control algorithm is formulated to determine the controllable clamping force of a variable friction device; this algorithm uses measurements of the absolute acceleration and device relative displacements for determining the control action to ensure that the algorithm would be implementable on a physical structure. The friction device UHYDE-fbr is designed and manufactured such that the normal force in the friction interface can be influenced with air pressure chamber, hence the normal force and friction damping can be controlled. The friction device is a controllable energy dissipation device that cannot add mechanical energy to the structural system; the proposed control strategy is fail-safe in that bounded-input, bounded-output stability of the controlled structure is guaranteed. The numerical results demonstrated that the performance of the presented control design is nearly the same as that of the active control system; and that the friction device can effectively be used to control seismically excited cable-stayed bridges with multiple-support excitations.

[1]  Rodolfo Villamizar,et al.  Robust control law for a friction-based semiactive controller of a two-span bridge , 2003, SPIE Smart Structures and Materials + Nondestructive Evaluation and Health Monitoring.

[2]  Uwe E. Dorka,et al.  Erdbebensicherung durch Structural Control , 2004 .

[3]  B. F. Spencer,et al.  Active Structural Control: Theory and Practice , 1992 .

[4]  Toshiro Hayashikawa,et al.  PARAMETRIC STUDY ON STEEL TOWER SEISMIC RESPONSE OF CABLE-STAYED BRIDGES UNDER GREAT EARTHQUAKE GROUND MOTION , 2003 .

[5]  Shirley J. Dyke,et al.  Semiactive Control Strategies for MR Dampers: Comparative Study , 2000 .

[6]  Yozo Fujino,et al.  Vibration, control and monitoring of long-span bridges - Recent research, developments and practice in Japan , 2002 .

[7]  Yutaka Inoue,et al.  Overview of the application of active/semiactive control to building structures in Japan , 2001 .

[8]  Y. K. Wen,et al.  Random vibration of hysteretic systems under bi‐directional ground motions , 1986 .

[9]  Shirley J. Dyke,et al.  PHASE I BENCHMARK CONTROL PROBLEM FOR SEISMIC RESPONSE OF CABLE-STAYED BRIDGES , 2003 .

[10]  Shirley J. Dyke,et al.  Phase II Benchmark Control Problem for Seismic Response of Cable-Stayed Bridges , 2003 .

[11]  Fumio Yamazaki,et al.  Response analysis of the Higashi–Kobe Bridge and surrounding soil in the 1995 Hyogoken–Nanbu Earthquake , 1998 .

[12]  A. M. Abdel-Ghaffar,et al.  Modeling the nonlinear seismic behavior of cable-stayed bridges with passive control bearings , 1995 .

[13]  Hirokazu Iemura,et al.  Passive and semi‐active seismic response control of a cable‐stayed bridge , 2002 .

[14]  Billie F. Spencer,et al.  Modeling and Control of Magnetorheological Dampers for Seismic Response Reduction , 1996 .