Gender difference analysis of cortical thickness in healthy young adults with surface-based methods

We have examined gender differences of cortical thickness using a 3-D surface-based method that enables more accurate measurement in deep sulci and localized regional mapping compared to volumetric analyses. Cortical thickness was measured using a direct method for calculating the distance between corresponding vertices from inner and outer cortical surfaces. We normalized cortical surfaces using 2-D surface registration and performed diffusion smoothing to reduce the variability of folding patterns and to increase the power of the statistical analysis. In stereotaxic space, significant localized cortical thickening in women was found extensively in frontal, parietal and occipital lobes, including the superior frontal gyrus (SFG), superior parietal gyrus (SPG), inferior frontal gyrus (IFG) and postcentral gyrus (PoCG) in the left hemisphere and mostly in the parietal lobe, including the SPG in the right hemisphere. In the temporal lobe, small regions of the left and right caudal superior temporal gyrus (STG) and the left temporal pole showed significantly greater cortical thickness in women. The temporal lobe shows relatively less significant thickening than other lobes in both hemispheres. In native space, significantly greater cortical thickness in women was detected in left parietal region, including SPG and PoCG. No significant local increases of cortical thickness were observed in men in both spaces. These findings suggest statistically significant cortical thickening in women in localized anatomical regions, which is consistent with several previous studies and may support a hypothesis of sexual dimorphism.

[1]  Christos Davatzikos,et al.  Hierarchical Matching of Cortical Features for Deformable Brain Image Registration , 1999, IPMI.

[2]  Pradeep Rajagopalan,et al.  Age and sex effects on brain morphology , 1997, Progress in Neuro-Psychopharmacology and Biological Psychiatry.

[3]  D. Louis Collins,et al.  Tuning and Comparing Spatial Normalization Methods , 2003, MICCAI.

[4]  M. Annett.  A classification of hand preference by association analysis. , 1970, British journal of psychology.

[5]  Jeffrey R. Binder,et al.  Volumetric vs. surface-based alignment for localization of auditory cortex activation , 2005, NeuroImage.

[6]  A. Dale,et al.  High‐resolution intersubject averaging and a coordinate system for the cortical surface , 1999, Human brain mapping.

[7]  Alan C. Evans,et al.  Automatic Quantification of Multiple Sclerosis Lesion Volume Using Stereotaxic Space , 1996, VBC.

[8]  Alan C. Evans,et al.  Automatic Quantification of MS Lesions in 3D MRI Brain Data Sets: Validation of INSECT , 1998, MICCAI.

[9]  D. Collins,et al.  Automatic 3D Intersubject Registration of MR Volumetric Data in Standardized Talairach Space , 1994, Journal of computer assisted tomography.

[10]  Alan C. Evans,et al.  Cortical thickness analysis examined through power analysis and a population simulation , 2005, NeuroImage.

[11]  I. Aharon,et al.  Three‐dimensional mapping of cortical thickness using Laplace's Equation , 2000, Human brain mapping.

[12]  M. Peters.  Sex differences in human brain size and the general meaning of differences in brain size. , 1991, Canadian journal of psychology.

[13]  Karl J. Friston,et al.  Voxel-Based Morphometry—The Methods , 2000, NeuroImage.

[14]  A M Dale,et al.  Measuring the thickness of the human cerebral cortex from magnetic resonance images. , 2000, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[15]  M. Chung.  Tensor-Based Surface Morphometry , 2002 .

[16]  B. Turetsky,et al.  Sex Differences in Brain Gray and White Matter in Healthy Young Adults: Correlations with Cognitive Performance , 1999, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[17]  Frithjof Kruggel,et al.  Gender and age effects in structural brain asymmetry as measured by MRI texture analysis , 2003, NeuroImage.

[18]  A. Wisniewski.  SEXUALLY-DIMORPHIC PATTERNS OF CORTICAL ASYMMETRY, AND THE ROLE FOR SEX STEROID HORMONES IN DETERMINING CORTICAL PATTERNS OF LATERALIZATION , 1998, Psychoneuroendocrinology.

[19]  Godfrey D. Pearlson,et al.  Structural differences in the cerebral cortex of healthy female and male subjects: a magnetic resonance imaging study , 1995, Psychiatry Research: Neuroimaging.

[20]  Nancy C Andreasen,et al.  Sexual dimorphism in the human brain: evaluation of tissue volume, tissue composition and surface anatomy using magnetic resonance imaging , 2000, Psychiatry Research: Neuroimaging.

[21]  S. F. Witelson,et al.  Women have greater density of neurons in posterior temporal cortex , 1995, The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience.

[22]  Moo K. Chung,et al.  Deformation-based surface morphometry applied to gray matter deformation , 2003, NeuroImage.

[23]  N. Makris,et al.  Normal sexual dimorphism of the adult human brain assessed by in vivo magnetic resonance imaging. , 2001, Cerebral cortex.

[24]  A. Dale,et al.  Thinning of the cerebral cortex in aging. , 2004, Cerebral cortex.

[25]  Paul M. Thompson,et al.  Mapping cortical gray matter in the young adult brain: Effects of gender , 2005, NeuroImage.

[26]  Faith M. Gunning-Dixon,et al.  Aging, sexual dimorphism, and hemispheric asymmetry of the cerebral cortex: replicability of regional differences in volume , 2004, Neurobiology of Aging.

[27]  Thomas E. Nichols,et al.  Thresholding of Statistical Maps in Functional Neuroimaging Using the False Discovery Rate , 2002, NeuroImage.

[28]  Shu-Yen Wan,et al.  A medial-surface oriented 3-d two-subfield thinning algorithm , 2001, Pattern Recognit. Lett..

[29]  Hanna Damasio,et al.  Sexual dimorphism and asymmetries in the gray–white composition of the human cerebrum , 2003, NeuroImage.

[30]  Alan C. Evans,et al.  Anatomical standardization of the human brain in euclidean 3-space and on the cortical 2-manifold , 2004 .

[31]  Alan C. Evans,et al.  Focal decline of cortical thickness in Alzheimer's disease identified by computational neuroanatomy. , 2004, Cerebral cortex.

[32]  Alan C. Evans,et al.  Automated 3-D extraction and evaluation of the inner and outer cortical surfaces using a Laplacian map and partial volume effect classification , 2005, NeuroImage.

[33]  Karl J. Friston,et al.  Cerebral Asymmetry and the Effects of Sex and Handedness on Brain Structure: A Voxel-Based Morphometric Analysis of 465 Normal Adult Human Brains , 2001, NeuroImage.

[34]  K. Amunts,et al.  Interhemispheric asymmetry of the human motor cortex related to handedness and gender , 2000, Neuropsychologia.

[35]  Alan C. Evans,et al.  Automated 3-D Extraction of Inner and Outer Surfaces of Cerebral Cortex from MRI , 2000, NeuroImage.

[36]  Alessandro Bertolino,et al.  Gender differences in gray matter density: A study of structural MRI images using voxel-based morphometry , 2000, NeuroImage.

[37]  Deborah A Yurgelun-Todd,et al.  Sex Differences in Cerebral Tissue Volume and Cognitive Performance during Adolescence , 2002, Psychological reports.

[38]  Alan C. Evans,et al.  Measurement of Cortical Thickness Using an Automated 3-D Algorithm: A Validation Study , 2001, NeuroImage.

[39]  Alan C. Evans,et al.  A nonparametric method for automatic correction of intensity nonuniformity in MRI data , 1998, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging.

[40]  Eileen Luders,et al.  Gender differences in cortical complexity , 2004, Nature Neuroscience.

[41]  D. V. van Essen,et al.  Functional and structural mapping of human cerebral cortex: solutions are in the surfaces. , 1998, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.