The transformation of product development process into lean environment using set-based concurrent engineering: A case study from an aerospace industry

This article presents a transformation process towards lean product development in an aerospace industry. This transformation was achieved in two main stages: the first was to integrate the principles of set-based concurrent engineering into an existing product development model of an aerospace company. This stage included defining activities and associated tools. The second stage was to implement the developed model in a research-based industrial case study, a helicopter engine in this case. Three main outcomes were realised from this work. First, it presented an industrial case of lean transformation in product development, where the leanness of an existing model was enhanced by embedding set-based concurrent engineering principles. Second, the developed model was structured into a set of well-defined activities and associated tools that were previously scattered or redundant. Finally, the developed model was trialled in an industrial project of a helicopter engine, tested to evaluate its value in enhancing the innovation level and reducing risk. The work presented in this article focused on early stage system level design, and future work will extend the implementation of set-based concurrent engineering to sub-system and component levels.

[1]  Durward K. Sobek,et al.  Toyota's Principles of Set-Based Concurrent Engineering , 1999 .

[2]  Moreno Muffatto,et al.  Reorganizing for product development: Evidence from Japanese automobile firms , 1998 .

[3]  Durward K. Sobek,et al.  Another look at how Toyota integrates product development , 1998 .

[4]  Tiago Pascoal Filomena,et al.  Target costing operationalization during product development: Model and application , 2009 .

[5]  Eric Rebentisch,et al.  A Framework for Organizing Lean Product Development , 2011 .

[6]  Durward K. Sobek,et al.  The Second Toyota Paradox: How Delaying Decisions Can Make Better Cars Faster , 1995 .

[7]  Muhammad Sharjeel Khan,et al.  The construction of a model for lean product development , 2012 .

[8]  Dragan Stokic,et al.  The Conceptual LeanPPD Model , 2010, ISPE CE.

[9]  Taiichi Ohno,et al.  Toyota Production System : Beyond Large-Scale Production , 1988 .

[10]  Mikel Sorli,et al.  Towards lean product and process development , 2013, Int. J. Comput. Integr. Manuf..

[11]  Haruo Ishikawa,et al.  Representing and Aggregating Engineering Quantities with Preference Structure for Set-based Concurrent Engineering , 2005, Concurr. Eng. Res. Appl..

[12]  Ahmed Al-Ashaab,et al.  Set-Based Concurrent Engineering process within the LeanPPD environment , 2011, ISPE CE.

[13]  Dag Raudberget,et al.  Practical Applications of Set-Based Concurrent Engineering in Industry , 2010 .

[14]  Eduard Doujak A tool for the future , 2005 .

[15]  Masato Inoue,et al.  Design Support System by Combination of 3D-CAD and CAE with Preference Set-based Design Method , 2010, Concurr. Eng. Res. Appl..

[16]  Bengt Klefsjö,et al.  The machine that changed the world , 2008 .

[17]  Hilda C. Martínez León,et al.  Lean Product Development Research: Current State and Future Directions , 2011 .

[18]  Donovan R. Hardenbrook,et al.  Ready, Set, Dominate: Implement Toyota's Set-Based Learning for Developing Products and Nobody Can Catch You! by Michael Kennedy, Kent Harmon, and Ed Minnock , 2009 .

[19]  Jeffrey K. Liker,et al.  The Toyota Product Development System: Integrating People, Process And Technology , 2006 .

[20]  Biren Prasad Toward Definitions of a Concurrent Product Design, Development, and Delivery (PD 3) System , 1996 .

[21]  大野 耐一,et al.  Toyota production system : beyond large-scale production , 1988 .