Epistemology of Transformative Material Activity: John Dewey's Pragmatism and Cultural‐Historical Activity Theory

The paper compares John Dewey's pragmatism and cultural-historical activity theory as epistemologies and theories of transformative material activity. For both of the theories, the concept of activity, the prototype of which is work, constitutes a basis for understanding the nature of knowledge and reality. This concept also implies for both theories a methodological approach of studying human behavior in which social experimentation and intervention play a central role. They also suggest that reflection and thought, mediated by language and semiotic artifacts, serve the reorientation of activity and is vital in the development of new, alternative ways of action. That is why Dewyan pragmatism and activity theory supply means of understanding organizational behavior and change in human activities better than the concepts of practice based on rule following, routines or embodied skills.

[1]  Pierre Bourdieu,et al.  Outline of a Theory of Practice , 2020, On Violence.

[2]  B. Latour.  When things strike back: a possible contribution of ‘science studies’ to the social sciences , 2000 .

[3]  Megan Watkins,et al.  SO, HOW DID BOURDIEU LEARN TO PLAY TENNIS? HABITUS, CONSCIOUSNESS AND HABITUATION , 2003 .

[4]  W. Gavin.  Context over Foundation , 1988 .

[5]  S. Brinkmann.  Psychology as a Moral Science: Aspects of John Dewey’s Psychology , 2004 .

[6]  R. Prawat.  Social constructivism and the process‐content distinction as viewed by Vygotsky and the pragmatists , 1999 .

[7]  R. Miettinen,et al.  The riddle of things: Activity theory and actor‐network theory as approaches to studying innovations , 1999 .

[8]  N. Crossley.  The phenomenological habitus and its construction , 2001 .

[9]  P. Baert.  Pragmatism, Realism and Hermeneutics , 2003 .

[10]  Yrjö Engeström,et al.  Communication, discourse and activity , 1999 .

[11]  Andreas Reckwitz.  Toward a Theory of Social Practices , 2002 .

[12]  Michael Glassman,et al.  Dewey and Vygotsky: Society, Experience, and Inquiry in Educational Practice , 2001 .

[13]  Reijo Miettinen,et al.  Artifact Mediation in Dewey and in Cultural-Historical Activity Theory , 2001 .

[14]  Jim Garrison,et al.  Dewey's philosophy and the experience of working: Labor, tools and language , 1995, Synthese.

[15]  Richard S. Prawat,et al.  Dewey and Vygotsky Viewed Through the Rearview Mirror—and Dimly at That , 2002 .

[16]  G. Mead,et al.  The Working Hypothesis in Social Reform , 1899, American Journal of Sociology.

[17]  T. Popkewitz.  Dewey, Vygotsky, and the Social Administration of the Individual: Constructivist Pedagogy as Systems of Ideas in Historical Spaces , 1998 .

[18]  John Dewey.  O desenvolvimento do pragmatismo americano , 2007 .

[19]  Alex Preda.  Order with Things? Humans, Artifacts, and the Sociological Problem of Rule-Following , 2000 .

[20]  D. Hess,et al.  Science Studies and Activism , 2002 .

[21]  Jim Garrison,et al.  An Introduction to Dewey's Theory of Functional "Trans-Action": An Alternative Paradigm for Activity Theory , 2001 .

[22]  R. Clarke Fowler,et al.  The nature(s) of developmental change: Piaget, Vygotsky, and the transition process , 1997 .

[23]  T. Taylor,et al.  Fungal associations in the terrestrial paleoecosystern. , 1990, Trends in ecology & evolution.

[24]  Timothy Koschmann,et al.  The Concept of Breakdown in Heidegger, Leont'ev, and Dewey and Its Implications for Education , 1998 .

[25]  A. Pickering.  The Mangle of Practice: Agency and Emergence in the Sociology of Science , 1993, American Journal of Sociology.

[26]  R. Miettinen,et al.  The concept of experiential learning and John Dewey's theory of reflective thought and action , 2000 .

[27]  Hannele Kerosuo,et al.  Boundary crossing and learning in creation of new work practice , 2003 .

[28]  Reijo Miettinen,et al.  Object Construction and Networks in Research Work: , 1998 .

[29]  R. Miettinen,et al.  Epistemic Objects, Artefacts and Organizational Change , 2005 .