Negotiation in Small Groups

Etude examinant, dans des groupes de 3 personnes devant aboutir a un accord sur plusieurs questions, l'influence de certains modes d'organisation du travail et du pouvoir sur la qualite de la negociation

[1]  J. Thibaut.  The development of contractual norms in bargaining: replication and variation , 1968 .

[2]  Charles R. Plott,et al.  Axiomatic Social Choice Theory: An Overview and Interpretation , 1976 .

[3]  Max H. Bazerman,et al.  Groups as mixed motive negotiations , 1988 .

[4]  H. Raiffa.  The art and science of negotiation , 1983 .

[5]  C. Nemeth,et al.  Interactions between jurors as a function of majority vs. unanimity decision rules. , 1977 .

[6]  Charles E. Miller,et al.  Group Discussion and Judgment , 1983 .

[7]  David A. Kravitz,et al.  The effects of alternatives in bargaining , 1979 .

[8]  M. E. Shaw.  Group dynamics : the psychology of small group behavior , 1971 .

[9]  K. Lewin.  Field theory in social science , 1951 .

[10]  R. Walton,et al.  A Behavioral Theory of Labor Negotiations: an Analysis of a Social Interaction System , 1965 .

[11]  R. Emerson.  Power-Dependence Relations , 1962, Power in Modern Societies.

[12]  A. Hare,et al.  Handbook of small group research , 1962 .

[13]  J. Chertkoff,et al.  A review of experiments in explicit bargaining , 1976 .

[14]  E LevineMichael,et al.  Agenda Influence and Its Implications , 1977 .

[15]  J. Keith Murnighan,et al.  Models of coalition behavior: Game theoretic, social psychological, and political perspectives. , 1978 .

[16]  Max H. Bazerman,et al.  Negotiating in Organizations , 1983 .

[17]  "PERT" as a logical adjunct to the discussion process. , 1965, The Journal of communication.

[18]  J. G. Holmes,et al.  Functions of a third party in the resolution of conflict: The role of a judge in pretrial conferences. , 1974 .

[19]  N. Pennington,et al.  Inside the Jury. , 1985 .

[20]  J. Rubin,et al.  The social psychology of bargaining and negotiation , 1975 .

[21]  B. J. Winer.  Statistical Principles in Experimental Design , 1992 .

[22]  Adams Js.  Towards an understanding of inequity , 1963 .

[23]  Paul B. Paulus,et al.  Basic group processes , 1983 .

[24]  S. Marcia,et al.  Simulation and Games. , 1969 .

[25]  G. C. Homans,et al.  Social Behavior: Its Elementary Forms. , 1975 .

[26]  G. Huber.  Managerial decision making , 1980 .

[27]  J. Thibaut,et al.  The development of contractual norms in a bargaining situation under two types of stress , 1965 .

[28]  Michael P. Malone,et al.  The effects of time pressure and issue settlement order on integrative bargaining. , 1976 .

[29]  C. Plott,et al.  A Model of Agenda Influence on Committee Decisions , 1978 .

[30]  J. R. French,et al.  The bases of social power. , 1959 .

[31]  C. H. Castore,et al.  Determinants of support for group decisions , 1978 .

[32]  Peter J. Carnevale,et al.  Effects of trust, aspiration, and gender on negotiation tactics. , 1980 .

[33]  L. Ross,et al.  The “false consensus effect”: An egocentric bias in social perception and attribution processes , 1977 .

[34]  I. Janis.  Groupthink: Psychological Studies of Policy Decisions and Fiascoes , 1982 .

[35]  Jerome M. Chertkoff,et al.  A bargaining theory of coalition formation. , 1973 .

[36]  A. Paul Hare.  Simulating Group Decisions , 1970 .

[37]  Dorwin Cartwright,et al.  Risk taking by individuals and groups: An assessment of research employing choice dilemmas. , 1971 .

[38]  M. Bazerman.  Judgment in Managerial Decision Making , 1990 .

[39]  Dorwin Cartwright,et al.  Studies in Social Power. , 1960 .

[40]  Larry A. Samovar,et al.  Small Group Communication , 1991 .

[41]  Steven D. Seilheimer,et al.  Looking and Competing: Accountability and Visual Access in Integrative Bargaining , 1981 .

[42]  Robert Ladner,et al.  Strategic Interaction and Conflict , 1973 .

[43]  H. Kelley,et al.  The social psychology of groups , 1960 .

[44]  P. Fishburn.  Paradoxes of Voting , 1974, American Political Science Review.

[45]  L. Thompson,et al.  Group negotiation: Effects of decision rule, agenda, and aspiration. , 1988 .

[46]  Lewis A. Froman,et al.  Research reports. Compromise and logroll: Comparing the efficiency of two bargaining processes , 1970 .

[47]  Robert W. Holt,et al.  Guilt beyond a reasonable doubt: Effects of concept definition and assigned decision rule on the judgments of mock jurors. , 1976 .

[48]  D. G. Pruitt,et al.  Development of integrative solutions in bilateral negotiation. , 1975 .