Sabotage Attack Detection for Additive Manufacturing Systems

This paper presents a novel multi-modal sabotage attack detection system for Additive Manufacturing (AM) machines. By utilizing multiple side-channels, we improve system state estimation significantly in comparison to uni-modal techniques. Besides, we analyze the value of each side-channel for performing attack detection in terms of mutual information shared with the machine control parameters. We evaluate our system on real-world test cases and achieve an attack detection accuracy of 98.15%. AM, or 3D Printing, is seeing practical use for the rapid prototyping and production of industrial parts. The digitization of such systems not only makes AM a crucial technology in Industry 4.0 but also presents a broad attack surface that is vulnerable to kinetic cyberattacks. In the field of AM security, sabotage attacks are cyberattacks that introduce inconspicuous defects to a manufactured component at any specific process of the AM digital process chain, resulting in the compromise of the component’s structural integrity and load-bearing capabilities. Defense mechanisms that detect such attacks using side-channel analysis have been studied. However, most current works focus on modeling the state of AM systems using a single side-channel, thus limiting their effectiveness at attack detection. In this paper, we demonstrate the value of a multi-modal sabotage attack detection system in comparison to uni-modal techniques.

[1]  Josip Stjepandic,et al.  Intellectual Property Protection of 3D Print Supply Chain with Blockchain Technology , 2018, 2018 IEEE International Conference on Engineering, Technology and Innovation (ICE/ITMC).

[2]  Scott D. Applegate The dawn of Kinetic Cyber , 2013, 2013 5th International Conference on Cyber Conflict (CYCON 2013).

[3]  Arquimedes Canedo,et al.  KCAD: Kinetic Cyber-attack detection method for Cyber-physical additive manufacturing systems , 2016, 2016 IEEE/ACM International Conference on Computer-Aided Design (ICCAD).

[4]  Mohammad Abdullah Al Faruque,et al.  Security trends and advances in manufacturing systems in the era of industry 4.0 , 2017, 2017 IEEE/ACM International Conference on Computer-Aided Design (ICCAD).

[5]  Mark Ferguson The state of 3D printing , 2016 .

[6]  Bruce M. McMillin,et al.  Analysis of information flow security in cyber-physical systems , 2010, Int. J. Crit. Infrastructure Prot..

[7]  Michael Hamburg,et al.  Meltdown , 2018, meltdownattack.com.

[8]  Farinaz Koushanfar,et al.  A Survey of Hardware Trojan Taxonomy and Detection , 2010, IEEE Design & Test of Computers.

[9]  Pablo Sánchez-Sánchez,et al.  Cartesian Control for Robot Manipulators , 2010 .

[10]  Arquimedes Canedo,et al.  QUILT: quality inference from living digital twins in IoT-enabled manufacturing systems , 2019, IoTDI.

[11]  Stefanie Müller,et al.  WirePrint: 3D printed previews for fast prototyping , 2014, UIST.

[12]  Adam J. Brown,et al.  Security of additive manufacturing: Attack taxonomy and survey , 2018 .

[13]  Sujit Rokka Chhetri,et al.  Information Leakage-Aware Computer-Aided Cyber-Physical Manufacturing , 2018, IEEE Transactions on Information Forensics and Security.

[14]  Vir V. Phoha,et al.  Detecting Malicious Defects in 3D Printing Process Using Machine Learning and Image Classification , 2016 .

[15]  FlankSharon,et al.  Anticounterfeiting Options for Three-Dimensional Printing , 2015 .

[16]  Yuval Elovici,et al.  Detecting Cyber-Physical Attacks in Additive Manufacturing using Digital Audio Signing , 2017, ArXiv.

[17]  Jules White,et al.  Bad Parts: Are Our Manufacturing Systems at Risk of Silent Cyberattacks? , 2015, IEEE Security & Privacy.

[18]  Jeremy Straub,et al.  Identifying positioning-based attacks against 3D printed objects and the 3D printing process , 2017, Defense + Security.

[19]  Michael Hamburg,et al.  Spectre Attacks: Exploiting Speculative Execution , 2018, 2019 IEEE Symposium on Security and Privacy (SP).

[20]  Yuval Elovici,et al.  dr0wned - Cyber-Physical Attack with Additive Manufacturing , 2016, WOOT.

[21]  Andreas W. Kempa-Liehr,et al.  Time Series FeatuRe Extraction on basis of Scalable Hypothesis tests (tsfresh - A Python package) , 2018, Neurocomputing.

[22]  Philip Brisk,et al.  Oligo-Snoop: A Non-Invasive Side Channel Attack Against DNA Synthesis Machines , 2019, NDSS.

[23]  Arquimedes Canedo,et al.  Acoustic Side-Channel Attacks on Additive Manufacturing Systems , 2016, 2016 ACM/IEEE 7th International Conference on Cyber-Physical Systems (ICCPS).

[24]  Siva Sai Yerubandi,et al.  Differential Power Analysis , 2002 .

[25]  Nektarios Georgios Tsoutsos,et al.  Manufacturing and Security Challenges in 3D Printing , 2016 .

[26]  D. Woolley The White Paper. , 1972, British medical journal.

[27]  Wenyao Xu,et al.  My Smartphone Knows What You Print: Exploring Smartphone-based Side-channel Attacks Against 3D Printers , 2016, CCS.

[28]  Young B. Moon,et al.  Taxonomy for secure cybermanufacturing systems , 2018 .

[29]  Jill Slay,et al.  Lessons Learned from the Maroochy Water Breach , 2007, Critical Infrastructure Protection.

[30]  Saman A. Zonouz,et al.  See No Evil, Hear No Evil, Feel No Evil, Print No Evil? Malicious Fill Patterns Detection in Additive Manufacturing , 2017, USENIX Security Symposium.

[31]  L. Sturm,et al.  CYBER-PHYSICAL VUNERABILITIES IN ADDITIVE MANUFACTURING SYSTEMS , 2014 .

[32]  Mohammad Abdullah Al Faruque,et al.  Side Channels of Cyber-Physical Systems: Case Study in Additive Manufacturing , 2017, IEEE Des. Test.

[33]  Yuval Elovici,et al.  Power Consumption-based Detection of Sabotage Attacks in Additive Manufacturing , 2017, ArXiv.

[34]  M. A. Faruque Forensics of Thermal Side-Channel in Additive Manufacturing Systems , 2016 .

[35]  F. Marga,et al.  Toward engineering functional organ modules by additive manufacturing , 2012, Biofabrication.