Meta-analysis and the study of group dynamics.
暂无分享,去创建一个
[1] P. Cuijpers. Psychological outreach programmes for the depressed elderly: a meta‐analysis of effects and dropout , 1998, International journal of geriatric psychiatry.
[2] S. R. Wilson,et al. Individual versus group education: is one better? , 1997, Patient education and counseling.
[3] M. Saks,et al. A Meta-Analysis of the Effects of Jury Size , 1997 .
[4] G. Burlingame,et al. Evaluating the effectiveness of child and adolescent group treatment: a meta-analytic review. , 1997, Journal of clinical child psychology.
[5] D. Ensing,et al. A meta-analytic investigation of group treatment outcomes for sexually abused children. , 1997, Child abuse & neglect.
[6] James E. Driskell,et al. Presence of Others and Arousal: An Integration , 1997 .
[7] Ed Dubinsky,et al. Readings in Cooperative Learning for Undergraduate Mathematics. MAA Notes No. 44. , 1997 .
[8] K. Carpenter,et al. Group Sensitivity Training: Update, Meta-analysis, and Recommendations. , 1995 .
[9] E. Lawler,et al. Group processes : sociological analyses , 1995 .
[10] Blair T. Johnson,et al. Comparison of three major meta-analytic approaches. , 1995 .
[11] Eduardo Salas,et al. Group Cohesiveness and Quality of Decision Making , 1994 .
[12] B. Mullen,et al. The relation between group cohesiveness and performance: An integration. , 1994 .
[13] I. Benbasat,et al. The Effects of Group, Task,Context, and Technology Variables on the Usefulness of Group Support Systems , 1993 .
[14] Kipling D. Williams,et al. PROCESSES Social Loafing: A Meta-Analytic Review and Theoretical Integration , 2022 .
[15] E. Litwak,et al. Choosing optimal support groups: a review and reformulation. , 1993, Journal of health and social behavior.
[16] Brian Mullen,et al. Ingroup bias as a function of salience, relevance, and status: An integration , 1992 .
[17] John E. Hunter,et al. Methods of Meta-Analysis: Correcting Error and Bias in Research Findings , 1991 .
[18] Brian Mullen,et al. Group composition, salience, and cognitive representations: The phenomenology of being in a group. , 1991 .
[19] E. Salas,et al. Productivity loss in brainstorming groups: A meta-analytic integration. , 1991 .
[20] Jacob Cohen,et al. THINGS I HAVE LEARNED (SO FAR) , 1990 .
[21] B. Mullen,et al. Status, Expectations, and Behavior , 1990 .
[22] B. Mullen,et al. Jaywalking as a Function of Model Behavior , 1990 .
[23] B. Mullen,et al. Focus of attention in groups: a self-attention perspective. , 1989, The Journal of social psychology.
[24] Eduardo Salas,et al. Salience, motivation and artifact as contributions to the relation between participation rate and leadership , 1989 .
[25] P. E. Mudrack,et al. Group Cohesiveness and Productivity: A Closer Look , 1989 .
[26] Brian Mullen,et al. Perceptions of Ingroup and Outgroup Variability: A Meta-Analytic Integration , 1989 .
[27] Eduardo Salas,et al. Group Size, Leadership Behavior, and Subordinate Satisfaction , 1989 .
[28] Brian Mullen,et al. Advanced BASIC meta-analysis , 1989 .
[29] B. Mullen,et al. Social projection as a function of cognitive mechanisms: Two meta‐analytic integrations , 1988 .
[30] Irvin Summers,et al. Work-Group Cohesion , 1988 .
[31] Rupert Brown,et al. Group Processes: Dynamics Within and Between Groups , 1988 .
[32] Siu L. Chow,et al. Significance test or effect size , 1988 .
[33] Betsy Jane Becker,et al. Applying tests of combined significance in meta-analysis. , 1987 .
[34] R. Royall. The Effect of Sample Size on the Meaning of Significance Tests , 1986 .
[35] L. Hedges,et al. Statistical Methods for Meta-Analysis , 1987 .
[36] David B. Pillemer,et al. Summing Up: The Science of Reviewing Research , 1984 .
[37] R. Rosenthal. Meta-analytic procedures for social research , 1984 .
[38] R. Slavin. When does cooperative learning increase student achievement , 1983 .
[39] Brian Mullen,et al. Operationalizing the effect of the group on the individual: A self-attention perspective , 1983 .
[40] D. P. Hartmann,et al. Meta-analysis: Techniques, applications, and functions. , 1983 .
[41] J. Mintz,et al. Integrating research evidence: a commentary on meta-analysis. , 1983, Journal of consulting and clinical psychology.
[42] M. Cowles,et al. On the Origins of the .05 Level of Statistical Significance , 1982 .
[43] Paul M. Baker,et al. Introduction: Updating Small Group Research and Theory , 1981 .
[44] Paul B. Paulus,et al. Psychology of Group Influence , 1981 .
[45] R. Rosenthal. The file drawer problem and tolerance for null results , 1979 .
[46] Harris Cooper,et al. Statistically Combining Independent Studies: A Meta-Analysis of Sex Differences in Conformity Research , 1979 .
[47] Groups Would Do Better without Humans , 1978 .
[48] L. H. Pelton,et al. Child abuse and neglect: the myth of classlessness. , 1978, The American journal of orthopsychiatry.
[49] Shelley E. Taylor,et al. Categorical and contextual bases of person memory and stereotyping. , 1978 .
[50] Humans Would Do Better Without Groups , 1978 .
[51] K. J. Ives,et al. Experimental Methods (2) , 1978 .
[52] M. L. Smith,et al. Meta-analysis of psychotherapy outcome studies. , 1977, The American psychologist.
[53] R. Kanter. Some Effects of Proportions on Group Life: Skewed Sex Ratios and Responses to Token Women , 1977, American Journal of Sociology.
[54] G. Glass. Primary, Secondary, and Meta-Analysis of Research1 , 1976 .
[55] A. Greenwald. Consequences of Prejudice Against the Null Hypothesis , 1975 .
[56] I. Steiner. Group process and productivity , 1972 .
[57] M. E. Shaw. Group dynamics : the psychology of small group behavior , 1971 .
[58] J. Hackman,et al. Behavioral Correlates of Perceived Leadership. , 1969 .
[59] R. Rosenthal,et al. On the social psychology of the psychological experiment: the experimenter's hypothesis as unintended determinant of experimental results. , 1963, American scientist.
[60] P. C. Smith,et al. Current trends in industrial psychology , 1951 .
[61] S. Schachter. Deviation, rejection, and communication. , 1951, Journal of abnormal psychology.
[62] L. Festinger. Informal social communication. , 1950, Psychological review.
[63] Glenn L. McConagha,et al. The American soldier , 1949 .
[64] K. Pearson. ON A METHOD OF DETERMINING WHETHER A SAMPLE OF SIZE n SUPPOSED TO HAVE BEEN DRAWN FROM A PARENT POPULATION HAVING A KNOWN PROBABILITY INTEGRAL HAS PROBABLY BEEN DRAWN AT RANDOM , 1933 .
[65] Robert L. Thorndike,et al. The Effect of the Interval Between Test and Retest on the Constancy of the IQ , 1933 .
[66] R. Fisher,et al. Statistical Methods for Research Workers , 1930, Nature.