On-Chip Process Variation Detection and Compensation Using Delay and Slew-Rate Monitoring Circuits

In the nm design era, post-fabrication process characterization and compensation have become extremely important for mitigating the impact of process variations on the parametric yield. In this paper, a new variation detection and compensation scheme is presented that uses both slew and delay metrics to gauge the drive-strengths of and mismatch of NMOS and PMOS devices. The importance of considering both of these metrics is illustrated. Four compensation schemes are analyzed, based on delay or slew as the detection metric, with the ability to apply forward and reverse body-biasing. Design considerations, simulation results and power-performance characteristics of these schemes in a 45 nm SOI technology are presented. These schemes are shown to be capable of adjusting the critical path delay of the die to within the desired plusmn3% of the nominal delay while reducing the total power dissipation by an average of ~8% across various process corners.

[1]  Masayuki Miyazaki,et al.  Optimum threshold-voltage tuning for low-power, high-performance microprocessor , 2005, 2005 IEEE International Symposium on Circuits and Systems.

[2]  Kevin J. Nowka,et al.  Parametric yield analysis and constrained-based supply voltage optimization , 2005, Sixth international symposium on quality electronic design (isqed'05).

[3]  Tom W. Chen,et al.  Post Silicon Power/Performance Optimization in the Presence of Process Variations Using Individual Well-Adaptive Body Biasing , 2007, IEEE Transactions on Very Large Scale Integration (VLSI) Systems.

[4]  Ching-Te Chuang,et al.  On-Chip Process Variation Detection Using Slew-Rate Monitoring Circuit , 2008, 21st International Conference on VLSI Design (VLSID 2008).

[5]  Makoto Nagata,et al.  Substrate-noise and random-fluctuations reduction with self-adjusted forward body bias , 2005, Proceedings of the IEEE 2005 Custom Integrated Circuits Conference, 2005..

[6]  K. Takeda,et al.  Delay and power monitoring schemes for minimizing power consumption by means of supply and threshold voltage control in active and standby modes , 2006, IEEE Journal of Solid-State Circuits.

[7]  Alessandro Bogliolo,et al.  Measuring the effects of process variations on circuit performance by means of digitally-controllable ring oscillators , 2003, International Conference on Microelectronic Test Structures, 2003..

[8]  Mark Horowitz,et al.  Energy dissipation in general purpose microprocessors , 1996, IEEE J. Solid State Circuits.

[9]  Eric S. Fetzer Using Adaptive Circuits to Mitigate Process Variations in a Microprocessor Design , 2006, IEEE Design & Test of Computers.

[10]  Vivek De,et al.  Forward body bias for microprocessors in 130nm technology generation and beyond , 2002, VLSIC 2002.