Management Half-Truths and Nonsense: How to Practice Evidence-based Management:

The quest for information and research-based insight is an obsession in the capital markets. There is a veritable industry of analysts, investment bankers, portfolio managers, and investors who seek any informational advantage, which is one reason that academics who study finance have been recruited to work on Wall Street and with money managers. Yet the potential payoff for using valid evidence is even greater when it comes to managing organizations. At the same time, however, imitation is much slower and less effective in the world of management practices, in part because such practices depend on tacit knowledge and implementation skill, on knowing not just what to do but how to do it. In addition, management practices and logic resist copying because of the power of precedent and ideology. Most managers actually try to act on the best evidence. They follow the business press, buy business books, hire consultants, and attend seminars featuring business experts. While companies sometimes benefit from these efforts, there is surprisingly little rigorous use or serious appreciation of evidence-based management. This article explores these obstacles and offers guidelines to enable managers to better practice evidence-based management.

[1]  Björn Frank,et al.  Does economics make citizens corrupt , 2000 .

[2]  Dale T. Miller,et al.  The norm of self-interest. , 1999, The American psychologist.

[3]  Donald B. Rubin,et al.  Interpersonal expectancy effects: the first 345 studies , 1978, Behavioral and Brain Sciences.

[4]  Mary J. Benner,et al.  Exploitation, Exploration, and Process Management: The Productivity Dilemma Revisited , 2003 .

[5]  M. Hitt,et al.  Peters and Waterman Revisited: The Unended Quest for Excellence , 1987 .

[6]  Leslie Berlin,et al.  The Man Behind the Microchip: Robert Noyce and the Invention of Silicon Valley , 2005 .

[7]  Barry M. Staw,et al.  Attribution of the "causes" of performance: A general alternative interpretation of cross-sectional research on organizations. , 1975 .

[8]  Abraham B. Shani,et al.  Pygmalion goes to boot camp: Expectancy, leadership, and trainee performance. , 1982 .

[9]  D. McNatt,et al.  Ancient Pygmalion joins contemporary management: a meta-analysis of the result. , 2000, The Journal of applied psychology.

[10]  Jerker Denrell Vicarious Learning, Undersampling of Failure, and the Myths of Management , 2003, Organ. Sci..

[11]  Ricky W. Griffin,et al.  Objective and social sources of information in task redesign: A field experiment. , 1983 .

[12]  H. Varian,et al.  VERSIONING: THE SMART WAY TO SELL INFORMATION , 1998 .

[13]  R. Sternberg Implicit theories of intelligence. creativity, and wisdom , 1985 .

[14]  Baruch Fischhoff,et al.  Judgment under uncertainty: For those condemned to study the past: Heuristics and biases in hindsight , 1982 .

[15]  Daniel J. Brass,et al.  Employee Reactions to an Open-Plan Office: A Naturally Occurring Quasi-Experiment. , 1979 .

[16]  Darrell Rigby,et al.  Management Tools and Techniques: A Survey , 2001 .

[17]  Mark A. Mone,et al.  The Uniqueness Value and its Consequences for Organization Studies , 1993 .