Impact of External Knowledge Acquisition Strategies on Innovation: A Comparative Study Based on Dutch and Swiss Panel Data

In this paper we empirically investigate the impact of two external knowledge acquisition strategies—‘buy’ and ‘cooperate’—on firm’s innovation performance. Taking a direct (productivity) approach, we test for complementarity effects in the simultaneous use of the two strategies, and in the intensity of their use. Our results—based on panels of Dutch and Swiss innovating firms—suggest that while both ‘buy’ and ‘cooperate’ have a positive effect on innovation, there is little statistical evidence that using them simultaneously leads to higher innovation performance. Results from the Dutch sample provide some indication that there are positive economies of scope in doing external and cooperative R&D simultaneously.

[1]  Martin Woerter.  Driving Forces for Research and Development Strategies: An Empirical Analysis Based on Firm-Level Panel Data , 2007 .

[2]  Raymond De Bondt,et al.  Spillovers and innovative activities , 1997 .

[3]  Reinhilde Veugelers,et al.  Complementarity in the innovation strategy: Internal R&D, cooperation in R&D and external technology acquisition , 2002 .

[4]  Hans Lööf,et al.  The innovative performance of foreign-owned enterprises in small open economies , 2008 .

[5]  Claudia Schmiedeberg,et al.  Complementarities of innovation activities: An empirical analysis of the German manufacturing sector , 2008 .

[6]  Marco Ceccagnoli,et al.  Behind the Scenes: Sources of Complementarity in R&D , 2013 .

[7]  Reinhilde Veugelers,et al.  In Search of Complementarity in Innovation Strategy: Internal R&D and External Knowledge Acquisition , 2006, Manag. Sci..

[8]  Martin Wörter,et al.  Driving forces for research and development strategies: an empirical analysis based on firm-level panel data , 2007 .

[9]  Michael Fritsch,et al.  Product Innovation, Process Innovation, and Size , 2001 .

[10]  F. Scherer,et al.  Using Linked Patent and R&D Data to Measure Interindustry Technology Flows , 1984 .

[11]  OSÉ,et al.  INNOVATION COMPLEMENTARITY AND SCALE OF PRODUCTION ? , 2005 .

[12]  Henry Chesbrough,et al.  Open Innovation: The New Imperative for Creating and Profiting from Technology , 2003 .

[13]  Daniel A. Levinthal,et al.  ABSORPTIVE CAPACITY: A NEW PERSPECTIVE ON LEARNING AND INNOVATION , 1990 .

[14]  R. Veugelers,et al.  R&D Cooperation and Spillovers: Some Empirical Evidence , 1998 .

[15]  Victor Gilsing,et al.  Persistence of and interrelation between horizontal and vertical technology alliances , 2009 .

[16]  S. Athey,et al.  An Empirical Framework for Testing Theories About Complimentarity in Organizational Design , 1998 .

[17]  Rene Belderbos,et al.  Internal and External R&D: Complements or Substitutes? Evidence from a Dynamic Panel Data Model , 2006 .

[18]  Ning Wang,et al.  Is there complementarity or substitutability between internal and external R&D strategies? , 2012 .

[19]  Boris Lokshin,et al.  Complementarity in R&D Cooperation Strategies , 2006 .

[20]  Daniel Heller,et al.  Interpersonal Injustice and Workplace Deviance , 2012 .

[21]  Aija Leiponen,et al.  Core complementarities of the corporation: organization of an innovating firm , 2005 .

[22]  Mircea Marcu,et al.  R&D Sourcing, Joint Ventures and Innovation: A Multiple Indicators Approach , 2004 .

[23]  P. Beneito.  The innovative performance of in-house and contracted R&D in terms of patents and utility models , 2006 .

[24]  Julian Birkinshaw,et al.  External Sources of Knowledge, Governance Mode, and R&D Performance , 2005 .

[25]  Zvi Griliches,et al.  R&D, Patents, and Productivity , 1981 .

[26]  Carine Peeters,et al.  Innovation strategy and the patenting behavior of firms , 2006 .

[27]  Werner Bönte,et al.  R&D and productivity: Internal vs. external R&D - evidence from west german manufacturing industries , 2003 .

[28]  Martin Woerter,et al.  Knowledge and Technology Transfer Activities between Firms and Universities in Switzerland: An Analysis Based on Firm Data , 2011 .

[29]  Paul R. Milgrom,et al.  The Economics of Modern Manufacturing: Technology, Strategy, and Organization , 1990 .

[30]  Christoph Grimpe,et al.  Formal and Informal Knowledge and Technology Transfer from Academia to Industry: Complementarity Effects and Innovation Performance , 2013 .

[31]  Keith Pavitt,et al.  The Size Distribution of Innovating Firms in the UK: 1945-1983 , 1987 .

[32]  D. Gann,et al.  How open is innovation , 2010 .

[33]  CassimanBruno,et al.  In Search of Complementarity in Innovation Strategy , 2006 .

[34]  O. Williamson,et al.  Markets and Hierarchies: Analysis and Antitrust Implications. , 1977 .

[35]  Reinhilde Veugelers,et al.  Productivity growth, R&D and the rôle of international collaborative agreements: some évidence for Belgian manufacturing companies , 2003 .

[36]  Rene Belderbos,et al.  note on testing for complementarity and substitutability in the case of multiple practices , 2010 .

[37]  Martin Natter,et al.  Understanding a firm's openness decisions in innovation , 2012 .

[38]  Reinhilde Veugelers,et al.  On Young Highly Innovative Companies: Why They Matter and How (Not) to Policy Support Them , 2010 .

[39]  Boris Lokshin,et al.  The Productivity Effects of Internal and External R&D: Evidence from a Dynamic Panel Data Model , 2008 .

[40]  M. Carree,et al.  Cooperative R&D and Firm Performance , 2004 .

[41]  Christoph Grimpe,et al.  Formal and Informal Technology Transfer from Academia to Industry: Complementarity Effects and Innovation Performance , 2013 .

[42]  Boris Lokshin,et al.  Complementarity in R&D Cooperation Strategies , 2005 .

[43]  Daniel A. Levinthal,et al.  Innovation and Learning: The Two Faces of R&D , 1989 .

[44]  A. Salter,et al.  Open for innovation: the role of openness in explaining innovation performance among U.K. manufacturing firms , 2006 .