Comparison of Proximal Fusion to T1 or T2 in Double Thoracic Adolescent Idiopathic Scoliosis

Purpose : To assess the results of double thoracic fusion using pedicle screw instrumentation fused proximally to T1 or T2 in patients with double thoracic adolescent idiopathic scoliosis (AIS). Materials and Methods : Forty patients with double thoracic AIS were analyzed retrospectively after a minimum follow-up of 2 years. The patients were divided into two groups according to the proximal fusion level: the T1 group (n=26) was fused to T1 and the T2 group (n=14) was fused to T2. Results : There were no significant differences in the preoperative curve characteristics between the two groups. In the T1 group, the preoperative upper curve magnitude of 38±7˚ and apical vertebral translation (AVT) of 8±6 mm were corrected to 17±7˚ (54% correction) and 4±3 mm (3 mm correction) at the final follow-up, respectively. In the T2 group, the preoperative upper curve magnitude of 37±5˚ and the AVT of 7±4 mm were corrected to 22±6˚ (42% correction) and 6±3 mm (1 mm correction) at the final follow-up, respectively. There was no difference in the correction of lower thoracic curve, sagittal alignment and balance between the two groups. There was a significantly better correction in the upper thoracic curve and T1 tilting in the T1 group than the the T2 group. Conclusion : In double thoracic AIS, fusions to T1 and T2 produce satisfactory results. However, fusion to T1 is recommended for a better correction of the upper curve and T1 tilting.

[1]  B. Chang,et al.  Tactics for Surgical Treatment of the Double Thoracic Scoliosis - Significance of T1 tilt, first rib elevation and correction ratio - , 2002 .

[2]  S. Suk,et al.  Indications of Proximal Thoracic Curve Fusion in Thoracic Adolescent Idiopathic Scoliosis: Recognition and Treatment of Double Thoracic Curve Pattern in Adolescent Idiopathic Scoliosis Treated With Segmental Instrumentation , 1999, Spine.

[3]  Se Ii Suk,et al.  Segmental pedicle screw fixation in the treatment of thoracic idiopathic scoliosis. , 1995 .

[4]  C. K. Lee,et al.  Segmental Pedicle Screw Fixation in the Treatment of Thoracic Idiopathic Scoliosis , 1995, Spine.

[5]  C. K. Lee,et al.  Comparison of Cotrel-Dubousset pedicle screws and hooks in the treatment of idiopathic scoliosis , 1994, International Orthopaedics.

[6]  L. Lenke,et al.  Recognition and Treatment of the Proximal Thoracic Curve in Adolescent Idiopathic Scoliosis Treated with Cotrel‐Dubousset Instrumentation , 1994, Spine.

[7]  R. Winter,et al.  Analysis of the Upper Thoracic Curve in Surgically Treated Idiopathic Scoliosis: A New Concept of the Double Thoracic Curve Pattern , 1993, Spine.

[8]  R. Winter The Idiopathic Double Thoracic Curve Pattern: Its Recognition and Surgical Management , 1989, Spine.

[9]  R. Winter,et al.  The selection of fusion levels in thoracic idiopathic scoliosis. , 1983, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume.

[10]  K Zielke,et al.  [Prognosis of idiopathic scoliosis]. , 1978, Fortschritte der Medizin.

[11]  J. Moe,et al.  Idiopathic scoliosis. Analysis of curve patterns and the preliminary results of Milwaukee-brace treatment in one hundred sixty-nine patients. , 1970, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume.

[12]  J. Margulies,et al.  An algorithm for selection of instrumentation levels in scoliosis , 1998, European Spine Journal.

[13]  H. Ginsburg An evaluation of the upper thoracic curve in idiopathic scoliosis : Guide line in the selection of the fusion area , 1977 .