Artificial Grammar Learning in Tamarins (Saguinus oedipus) in Varying Stimulus Contexts

The human ability to detect regularities in sound sequences is a fundamental substrate of our language faculty. However, is this an ability exclusive to human language processing, or have we usurped a more general learning mechanism for this purpose, one shared with other species? The current study is an attempt to replicate and extend Hauser, Weiss, and Marcus’s (2002) retracted study (2010) of artificial grammar learning in tamarins to determine if tamarins can detect an underlying grammatical structure in a pattern of sounds. Human language consonant–vowel (CV) combinations from Hauser et al.’s original study, newly created tone sequences, and newly created monkey vocalizations made into sequences were used to familiarize tamarins to an AAB or ABB pattern. Tests of novel sounds in each condition were presented that either were consistent with the familiarized pattern or were different from it. Longer looking times toward the sound source (an audio speaker with a specific location in the auditory field) indicated recognition of novelty. Tamarins looked toward the speaker significantly longer with inconsistent human language CV sequences and with inconsistent tone sequences but not when an inconsistent monkey vocalization was presented. Moreover, tamarins showed differential rates of habituation to the different types of sound patterns, with more robust habituation to CV sequences and tone sequences than to monkey call sequences. The implications of these findings for the generality of learning mechanisms for linguistic and nonlinguistic input across species and the importance of testing across various stimuli are discussed.

[1]  M. Hauser,et al.  Grammatical pattern learning by human infants and cotton-top tamarin monkeys , 2008, Cognition.

[2]  J. B. Trobalon,et al.  Statistical computations over a speech stream in a rodent , 2005, Perception & psychophysics.

[3]  Marc D. Hauser,et al.  RETRACTED: Rule learning by cotton-top tamarins , 2002, Cognition.

[4]  Jenny R. Saffran,et al.  Constraints on Statistical Learning Across Species , 2018, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[5]  Gary Marcus,et al.  Rule learning by cotton-top tamarins. , 2002, Cognition.

[6]  J. Elman,et al.  Learning Rediscovered , 1996, Science.

[7]  Charles D. Yang Universal Grammar, statistics or both? , 2004, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[8]  Scott P. Johnson,et al.  Infant Rule Learning Facilitated by Speech , 2007, Psychological science.

[9]  M. Corballis Do rats learn rules? , 2009, Animal Behaviour.

[10]  David Poeppel,et al.  Rule-based and word-level statistics-based processing of language: insights from neuroscience , 2017, Language, cognition and neuroscience.

[11]  Gary F. Marcus,et al.  Infant Rule Learning: Advantage Language, or Advantage Speech? , 2012, PloS one.

[12]  David Poeppel,et al.  Interpretations of Frequency Domain Analyses of Neural Entrainment: Periodicity, Fundamental Frequency, and Harmonics , 2016, Front. Hum. Neurosci..

[13]  Peter M. Vishton,et al.  Rule learning by seven-month-old infants. , 1999, Science.

[14]  Isabelle Peretz,et al.  Without it no music: cognition, biology and evolution of musicality , 2015, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.

[15]  R. Gómez,et al.  Infant artificial language learning and language acquisition , 2000, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[16]  Steven Pinker,et al.  Language learnability and language development , 1985 .

[17]  Oded Ghitza,et al.  Acoustic-driven delta rhythms as prosodic markers , 2017 .

[18]  Brock Ferguson,et al.  Communicative signals support abstract rule learning by 7-month-old infants , 2016, Scientific Reports.

[19]  Kazuo Okanoya,et al.  Revisiting the syntactic abilities of non-human animals: natural vocalizations and artificial grammar learning , 2012, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.

[20]  Giorgio Vallortigara,et al.  Spontaneous Learning of Visual Structures in Domestic Chicks , 2018, Animals : an open access journal from MDPI.

[21]  C. Shimp,et al.  “Artificial grammar learning” in pigeons: A preliminary analysis , 2003, Learning & behavior.

[22]  Carel ten Cate,et al.  Rule learning by zebra finches in an artificial grammar learning task: which rule? , 2012, Animal Cognition.

[23]  Kentaro Abe,et al.  Songbirds possess the spontaneous ability to discriminate syntactic rules , 2011, Nature Neuroscience.

[24]  M. Hauser,et al.  Segmentation of the speech stream in a non-human primate: statistical learning in cotton-top tamarins , 2001, Cognition.

[25]  Carel Ten Cate,et al.  Budgerigars and zebra finches differ in how they generalize in an artificial grammar learning experiment , 2016, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[26]  J. Neiworth Chasing sounds , 2013, Behavioural Processes.

[27]  Elizabeth K. Johnson,et al.  Statistical learning of tone sequences by human infants and adults , 1999, Cognition.

[28]  Noam Chomsky,et al.  वाक्यविन्यास का सैद्धान्तिक पक्ष = Aspects of the theory of syntax , 1965 .

[29]  M. Goldsmith,et al.  Statistical Learning by 8-Month-Old Infants , 1996 .

[30]  J. Saffran Constraints on Statistical Language Learning , 2002 .

[31]  R. Gómez,et al.  Does hearing two dialects at different times help infants learn dialect-specific rules? , 2015, Cognition.

[32]  Esther Mondragón,et al.  Rule Learning by Rats , 2008, Science.