Sustaining the environment through e-waste recycling: an extended valence theory perspective

PurposeThe escalating volume of electronic waste (e-waste) presents a significant environmental and health hazard, emphasizing the importance of promoting e-waste recycling. Therefore, this study aims to utilize a valence theory approach to comprehensively understand the factors influencing individuals' intention to recycle e-waste.Design/methodology/approachA survey-based research approach was employed to examine the factors influencing consumers' e-waste recycling intention. Data were collected through an online survey questionnaire from Malaysian individuals aged 18 and above. The hypotheses were tested using a sample of 300 respondents, employing partial least squares structural equation modeling as a symmetric analysis technique. Additionally, fuzzy-set Qualitative Comparative Analysis (fsQCA), an asymmetric analysis approach, was used to gain deeper insights. Non-probability purposive sampling was utilized in the sampling process.FindingsThe PLS-SEM analysis revealed that subjective norms and willingness to change significantly impact e-waste recycling intention. Furthermore, perceived convenience, environmental concerns and social media usage were found to support the intention to recycle e-waste. The fsQCA results enhanced the interpretation by uncovering intricate relationships among the antecedents and identifying specific configurations that accurately predict consumers' recycling intentions.Practical implicationsThe practical implications of this study emphasize the need for policymakers and practitioners to raise awareness regarding the benefits of e-waste recycling, enhance convenience in the recycling process and strengthen personal and subjective norms to encourage individuals to recycle their e-waste.Originality/valueThis study's originality lies in its adoption of a valence theory framework to comprehend the intentions behind e-waste recycling, as well as its inclusion of control variables during the analysis. This unique approach enhances the understanding of factors influencing e-waste recycling intention and provides valuable insights for policymakers and practitioners in developing effective strategies to promote e-waste recycling behavior.

[1]  S. Parayitam,et al.  Exploring e- waste recycling behaviour intention among the households: Evidence from India , 2023, Cleaner Materials.

[2]  M. Sabbir,et al.  Understanding the determinants of consumers' reverse exchange intention as an approach to e-waste recycling: a developing country perspective , 2022, Asia-Pacific Journal of Business Administration.

[3]  Jianping Ge,et al.  What affects consumers' intention to recycle retired EV batteries in China? , 2022, Journal of Cleaner Production.

[4]  Huaming Song,et al.  Determinants of adoption intention of battery swap technology for electric vehicles , 2022, Energy.

[5]  S. P. Singh,et al.  Sharing economic responsibility: Assessing end user's willingness to support E-waste reverse logistics for circular economy , 2022, Journal of Cleaner Production.

[6]  K. Nawaser,et al.  Modelling electric vehicle purchase intention among generation Y consumers in Malaysia , 2022, Research in Transportation Business & Management.

[7]  Yeneneh Tamirat Negash,et al.  Engagement factors for household waste sorting in Ecuador: Improving perceived convenience and environmental attitudes enhances waste sorting capacity , 2021, Resources, Conservation and Recycling.

[8]  K. Nawaser,et al.  Understanding the determinants of e-wallet continuance usage intention in Malaysia , 2021, Quality & Quantity.

[9]  Ulla A. Saari,et al.  Sustainable consumption behavior of Europeans: The influence of environmental knowledge and risk perception on environmental concern and behavioral intention , 2021 .

[10]  Abaid Ullah Zafar,et al.  Social media and sustainable purchasing attitude: Role of trust in social media and environmental effectiveness , 2021, Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services.

[11]  S. M. Rasoolimanesh,et al.  Can tourist engagement enhance tourist behavioural intentions? A combination of PLS-SEM and fsQCA approaches , 2021, Tourism Recreation Research.

[12]  Ling Zhang,et al.  Understanding consumers’ behavior intention of recycling mobile phone through formal channels in China: The effect of privacy concern , 2021, Resources, Environment and Sustainability.

[13]  Usama Awan,et al.  Extended valence theory perspective on consumers' e-waste recycling intentions in Japan , 2021 .

[14]  C. Hall,et al.  Investigating the mediating role of visitor satisfaction in the relationship between memorable tourism experiences and behavioral intentions in heritage tourism context , 2021, Tourism Review.

[15]  Teoh Ai Ping,et al.  Predicting information security culture among employees of telecommunication companies in an emerging market , 2021, Inf. Comput. Secur..

[16]  S. Kumar,et al.  Evaluation of e-waste status, management strategies, and legislations , 2021, International Journal of Environmental Science and Technology.

[17]  Marcelo Corrêa da Silva,et al.  Extending the theory of planned behavior to understand consumer purchase behavior for organic vegetables in Brazil: The role of perceived health benefits, perceived sustainability benefits and perceived price , 2021, Food Quality and Preference.

[18]  Ali Vafaei-Zadeh,et al.  Safety Technology Adoption: Predicting Intention to Use Car Dashcams in an Emerging Country , 2021, International Journal of Innovation and Technology Management.

[19]  S. Bellman,et al.  Factors related to recycling plastic packaging in Finland's new waste management scheme. , 2021, Waste management.

[20]  G. Shen,et al.  The place-based approach to recycling intention: Integrating place attachment into the extended theory of planned behavior , 2021 .

[21]  Jagwinder Singh,et al.  Factors Influencing the Attitude Toward Anti-Littering Behavior , 2021, Journal of Applied Social Science.

[22]  Marko Sarstedt,et al.  The combined use of symmetric and asymmetric approaches: partial least squares-structural equation modeling and fuzzy-set qualitative comparative analysis , 2021 .

[23]  A. Tripathi,et al.  E-waste management: A review of recycling process, environmental and occupational health hazards, and potential solutions , 2021, Environmental Nanotechnology, Monitoring & Management.

[24]  Biao Luo,et al.  Do environmental concern and perceived risk contribute to consumers' intention toward buying remanufactured products? An empirical study from China , 2021, Clean Technologies and Environmental Policy.

[25]  Mototaka Sakashita,et al.  Behavioral reasoning theory (BRT) perspectives on E-waste recycling and management , 2021 .

[26]  Mariana Piton Hakim,et al.  Should I stay, or should I go? Consumers' perceived risk and intention to visit restaurants during the COVID-19 pandemic in Brazil , 2021, Food Research International.

[27]  M. Masud,et al.  Survey and analysis of consumers' behaviour for electronic waste management in Bangladesh. , 2021, Journal of environmental management.

[28]  Muhammad Iskandar Hamzah,et al.  Do pro-environmental factors lead to purchase intention of hybrid vehicles? The moderating effects of environmental knowledge , 2021 .

[29]  Sherah Kurnia,et al.  Supply chain information integration and its impact on the operational performance of manufacturing firms in Malaysia , 2020, Inf. Manag..

[30]  Claudel Mombeuil,et al.  Relative convenience, relative advantage, perceived security, perceived privacy, and continuous use intention of China’s WeChat Pay: A mixed-method two-phase design study , 2020 .

[31]  Hossein Olya.  Towards advancing theory and methods on tourism development from residents’ perspectives: Developing a framework on the pathway to impact , 2020, Journal of Sustainable Tourism.

[32]  M. Fadhil.  Sustaining The Environment Through Technology: Modeling Mobile E-Wallet As A Payment Option , 2020 .

[33]  N. Huda,et al.  Young consumers’ e-waste awareness, consumption, disposal, and recycling behavior: A case study of university students in Sydney, Australia , 2020 .

[34]  K. Thomas,et al.  A cost-benefit analysis of the downstream impacts of e-waste recycling in Pakistan. , 2020, Waste management.

[35]  B. Gupta,et al.  The adoption of online e-waste collection platform to improve environmental sustainability: an empirical study of Chinese millennials , 2020 .

[36]  Muhammad Khalid Anser,et al.  Social media usage and individuals' intentions toward adopting Bitcoin: The role of the theory of planned behavior and perceived risk , 2020, Int. J. Commun. Syst..

[37]  Edward Shih-Tse Wang,et al.  Norms, consumer social responsibility and fair trade product purchase intention , 2020 .

[38]  Xingle Long,et al.  Extending theory of planned behavior in household waste sorting in China: the moderating effect of knowledge, personal involvement, and moral responsibility , 2020, Environment, Development and Sustainability.

[39]  Sourabh Jain,et al.  Construction and demolition waste recycling: Investigating the role of theory of planned behavior, institutional pressures and environmental consciousness , 2020, Journal of Cleaner Production.

[40]  Puneet Kaur,et al.  An innovation resistance theory perspective on mobile payment solutions , 2020, Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services.

[41]  M. Nejati,et al.  Linking human values to consumer CSR perception: The moderating role of consumer skepticism , 2020 .

[42]  F. Ali,et al.  Understanding the Influence of Airport Servicescape on Traveler Dissatisfaction and Misbehavior , 2020, Journal of Travel Research.

[43]  C. Khoo-Lattimore,et al.  Tourist engagement and loyalty: gender matters? , 2020 .

[44]  Mohd Rizaimy Shaharudin,et al.  Linking determinants of the youth’s intentions to dispose of portable e-waste with the proper disposal behavior in Malaysia , 2020, The Social Science Journal.

[45]  Imran Mahmud,et al.  E-waste recycling intention paradigm of small and medium electronics store managers in Bangladesh: An S–O–R perspective , 2020, Waste management & research : the journal of the International Solid Wastes and Public Cleansing Association, ISWA.

[46]  Mei‐Fang Chen.  Selecting environmental psychology theories to predict people’s consumption intention of locally produced organic foods , 2020 .

[47]  S. Ramakrishna,et al.  A comprehensive analysis of e-waste legislation worldwide , 2020, Environmental Science and Pollution Research.

[48]  Doris Knickmeyer.  Social factors influencing household waste separation: A literature review on good practices to improve the recycling performance of urban areas , 2020, Journal of Cleaner Production.

[49]  Xunpeng Shi,et al.  The effects of behavioral intention on the choice to purchase energy-saving appliances in China: the role of environmental attitude, concern, and perceived psychological benefits in shaping intention , 2019, Energy Efficiency.

[50]  N. Ahmad,et al.  Emanating the key factors of innovation performance: leveraging on the innovation culture among SMEs in Malaysia , 2019, Journal of Asia Business Studies.

[51]  T. Ramayah,et al.  The role of social media on recycling behaviour , 2019, Sustainable Production and Consumption.

[52]  Claude Rubinson,et al.  Presenting qualitative comparative analysis: Notation, tabular layout, and visualization , 2019, Methodological Innovations.

[53]  M. Gannon,et al.  Does living in the vicinity of heritage tourism sites influence residents’ perceptions and attitudes? , 2019, Journal of Sustainable Tourism.

[54]  Marko Sarstedt,et al.  Heuristics versus statistics in discriminant validity testing: a comparison of four procedures , 2019, Internet Res..

[55]  Anita Kumar.  Exploring young adults’ e-waste recycling behaviour using an extended theory of planned behaviour model: A cross-cultural study , 2019, Resources, Conservation and Recycling.

[56]  A. Bernardes,et al.  Waste electrical and electronic equipment (WEEE) management: An analysis on the australian e-waste recycling scheme , 2018, Journal of Cleaner Production.

[57]  Kem Z. K. Zhang,et al.  Online reviews and impulse buying behavior: the role of browsing and impulsiveness , 2018, Internet Res..

[58]  Xiuhong He,et al.  How to activate moral norm to adopt electric vehicles in China? An empirical study based on extended norm activation theory , 2018 .

[59]  Joseph F. Hair,et al.  PLS-SEM or CB-SEM: updated guidelines on which method to use , 2017 .

[60]  P. D. Pelsmacker,et al.  Personal Values, Green Self-identity and Electric Car Adoption , 2017 .

[61]  Shanyong Wang,et al.  The intention to adopt electric vehicles: Driven by functional and non-functional values , 2017 .

[62]  Nan Hua,et al.  Understanding the mobile payment technology acceptance based on valence theory: A case of restaurant transactions , 2017 .

[63]  Geoffrey Qiping Shen,et al.  Experiential and instrumental attitudes: Interaction effect of attitude and subjective norm on recycling intention , 2017 .

[64]  Zhaohua Wang,et al.  Determinants of residents' e-waste recycling behaviour intentions: Evidence from China , 2016 .

[65]  Jan Dul,et al.  Identifying single necessary conditions with NCA and fsQCA , 2016 .

[66]  Ned Kock,et al.  PLS-based SEM Algorithms: The Good Neighbor Assumption, Collinearity, and Nonlinearity , 2015 .

[67]  Ryan E. Rhodes,et al.  Are mere instructions enough? Evaluation of four types of messaging on community depot recycling , 2014 .

[68]  T. Powers,et al.  Digital and Social Media In the Purchase Decision Process , 2012, Journal of Advertising Research.

[69]  Fujun Lai,et al.  Using Partial Least Squares in Operations Management Research: A Practical Guideline and Summary of Past Research , 2012 .

[70]  Peer C. Fiss.  Building Better Causal Theories: A Fuzzy Set Approach to Typologies in Organization Research , 2011 .

[71]  Oladele Osibanjo,et al.  Overview of electronic waste (e-waste) management practices and legislations, and their poor applications in the developing countries , 2008 .

[72]  M. Lindell,et al.  Accounting for common method variance in cross-sectional research designs. , 2001, The Journal of applied psychology.

[73]  Michael A. Tarrant,et al.  The Effect of Respondent Characteristics on General Environmental Attitude-Behavior Correspondence , 1997 .

[74]  I. Ajzen.  The theory of planned behavior , 1991 .

[75]  J. P. Peter,et al.  A Comparative Analysis of Three Consumer Decision Strategies , 1975 .

[76]  Jacob Cohen.  Statistical Power Analysis for the Behavioral Sciences , 1969, The SAGE Encyclopedia of Research Design.

[77]  W. Bilkey.  A Psychological Approach to Consumer Behavior Analysis 1 , 1953 .

[78]  Alok Tewari,et al.  Examining the role of receptivity to green communication, altruism and openness to change on young consumers’ intention to purchase green apparel: A multi-analytical approach , 2022, Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services.

[79]  Theresa Maria Rausch,et al.  Bridge the gap: Consumers’ purchase intention and behavior regarding sustainable clothing , 2021, Journal of Cleaner Production.

[80]  Arch G. Woodside,et al.  Fuzzy-set Qualitative Comparative Analysis (fsQCA): Guidelines for research practice in Information Systems and marketing , 2021, Int. J. Inf. Manag..

[81]  S. Singh,et al.  Electronic waste in the Caribbean: An impending environmental disaster or an opportunity for a circular economy? , 2021 .

[82]  M. Aboelmaged.  E-waste recycling behaviour: An integration of recycling habits into the theory of planned behaviour , 2021 .

[83]  L. T. Le,et al.  E-satisfaction and continuance intention: The moderator role of online ratings , 2019, International Journal of Hospitality Management.

[84]  Muhammad Imran Rasheed,et al.  Conscientiousness and smartphone recycling intention: The moderating effect of risk perception. , 2019, Waste management.

[85]  Ainin Sulaiman,et al.  The effects of Facebook browsing and usage intensity on impulse purchase in f-commerce , 2018, Comput. Hum. Behav..

[86]  Torben Hansen,et al.  How the interplay between consumer motivations and values influences organic food identity and behavior , 2018 .

[87]  Patrick Mikalef,et al.  Information technology-enabled dynamic capabilities and their indirect effect on competitive performance: Findings from PLS-SEM and fsQCA , 2017 .

[88]  M. Sarstedt,et al.  A new criterion for assessing discriminant validity in variance-based structural equation modeling , 2015 .

[89]  Scott B. MacKenzie,et al.  Working memory: theories, models, and controversies. , 2012, Annual review of psychology.