Soft-In Soft-Out Detection Using Partial Gaussian Approximation

This paper concerns the soft-in soft-out detection in a coded communication system, where the transmitted symbols are discrete valued, and the exact a posteriori probability (APP) detection often involves prohibitive complexity. By using the properties of Gaussian functions, an approximate approach to the APP detection is devised with the idea that, in the computation of the APP of each symbol, the remaining symbols are distinguished based on their contributions to the APP of the concerned symbol, and the symbols with less contributions are approximated as (continuous) Gaussian variables [hence the name partial Gaussian approximation (PGA)] to reduce the computational complexity. The connection between the PGA detector and the reduced dimension maximum a posteriori detector (RDMAP) is investigated. It is shown that, PGA is equivalent to RDMAP, but it has a complexity much lower than that of RDMAP, i.e., PGA can be regarded as an efficient implementation of RDMAP. In addition, the application of PGA in intersymbol interference (ISI) channel equalization is also investigated. We show that PGA allows further significant complexity reduction by exploiting the circulant structure of the system transfer matrix, which makes PGA very attractive in handling severe ISI channels with large memory length.

[1]  Defeng Huang,et al.  A Concise Representation for the Soft-in Soft-out LMMSE Detector , 2011, IEEE Communications Letters.

[2]  Geert Leus,et al.  Block Transmissions over Doubly Selective Channels: Iterative Channel Estimation and Turbo Equalization , 2010, EURASIP J. Adv. Signal Process..

[3]  Li Ping,et al.  An extending window MMSE turbo equalization algorithm , 2004, IEEE Signal Process. Lett..

[4]  Alain Glavieux,et al.  Turbo equalization: adaptive equalization and channel decoding jointly optimized , 2001, IEEE J. Sel. Areas Commun..

[5]  S. Pasupathy,et al.  Reduced-dimension MAP turbo-BLAST detection , 2006, IEEE Transactions on Communications.

[6]  John G. Proakis,et al.  Digital Communications , 1983 .

[7]  Alain Glavieux,et al.  Iterative correction of intersymbol interference: Turbo-equalization , 1995, Eur. Trans. Telecommun..

[8]  H. Vincent Poor,et al.  Iterative (turbo) soft interference cancellation and decoding for coded CDMA , 1999, IEEE Trans. Commun..

[9]  David Falconer,et al.  Frequency domain equalization for single-carrier broadband wireless systems , 2002, IEEE Commun. Mag..

[10]  R. Koetter,et al.  Turbo equalization , 2004, IEEE Signal Processing Magazine.

[11]  Li Ping,et al.  A Low-Complexity Iterative Channel Estimation and Detection Technique for Doubly Selective Channels , 2009, IEEE GLOBECOM 2008 - 2008 IEEE Global Telecommunications Conference.

[12]  Li Ping,et al.  LMMSE turbo equalization based on factor graphs , 2008, IEEE Journal on Selected Areas in Communications.

[13]  Xiaojun Yuan,et al.  Multi-User Detection Techniques for Potential 3GPP Long Term Evolution (LTE) Schemes , 2007, MCSS.

[14]  Rui Dinis,et al.  A Turbo FDE Technique for Reduced-CP SC-Based Block Transmission Systems , 2007, IEEE Transactions on Communications.

[15]  Andrew C. Singer,et al.  Minimum mean squared error equalization using a priori information , 2002, IEEE Trans. Signal Process..

[16]  Hong Liu,et al.  Iterative frequency-domain channel estimation and equalization for single-carrier transmissions without cyclic-prefix , 2008, IEEE Trans. Wirel. Commun..

[17]  John Newbury,et al.  Power line communications : theory and applications for narrowband and broadband communications over power lines , 2010 .

[18]  Andrew C. Singer,et al.  Turbo equalization: principles and new results , 2002, IEEE Trans. Commun..

[19]  John Cocke,et al.  Optimal decoding of linear codes for minimizing symbol error rate (Corresp.) , 1974, IEEE Trans. Inf. Theory.