The Cumulative and Residual Impact of a Systemic Reform Program on Teacher Change and Student Learning of Science

This longitudinal, five-year study of teachers and students who had participated in a systemic reform program in science explored if (1) teacher change in practice realized during a three-year program is sustained one, two, and three years following the program, (2) student performance on state science assessments two years following studying with teachers at this school still demonstrated significant differences from students who attended the control school, and (3) student performance continued to be enhanced for both White and Minority students. Student achievement was assessed using the Discovery Inquiry Test in Science during sixth through eighth grades and the Ohio Graduation Test was used in 10th grade. The same students completed the test in grades 6–8 and 10th grade. Students from the Program school significantly outperformed students who attended the control school on the 10th grade state assessment in science. Findings in this study revealed the ability for sustained, whole-school, professional development programs to have a cumulative and residual impact on teacher change and student learning of science.

[1]  Carla C. Johnson.  Effective Science Teaching, Professional Development and No Child Left Behind: Barriers, Dilemmas, and Reality , 2007 .

[2]  David Kastberg,et al.  Highlights from the Trends in International Mathematics and Science Study (TIMSS), 2003. NCES 2005-005. , 2004 .

[3]  Jamison D. Fargo,et al.  A Study of the Effect of Sustained, Whole-School Professional Development on Student Achievement in Science , 2007 .

[4]  Robert Eaker,et al.  Professional Learning Communities at Work: Best Practices for Enhancing Student Achievement , 1998 .

[5]  Kathryn Scantlebury,et al.  Urban african-american middle school science students : Does standards-based teaching make a difference? , 2000 .

[6]  J. Gilbert,et al.  Teacher Development: A Model From Science Education , 1995 .

[7]  J. Shea.  National Science Education Standards , 1995 .

[8]  Carla C. Johnson,et al.  Transformative Professional Development: A Model for Urban Science Education Reform , 2009 .

[9]  Carolyn W. Keys,et al.  Co-Constructing Inquiry-based Science with Teachers: Essential Research for Lasting Reform. , 2001 .

[10]  M. Fullan.  The New Meaning of Educational Change , 1990 .

[11]  Mary M. Atwater,et al.  Research in urban science education: An essential journey , 2006 .

[12]  Ronald D. Anderson.  Reforming Science Teaching: What Research Says About Inquiry , 2002 .

[13]  Kathryn A. LeRoy,et al.  Science inquiry and student diversity: Enhanced abilities and continuing difficulties after an instructional intervention , 2006 .

[14]  Larry D. Yore,et al.  Impact of a school district's science reform effort on the achievement and attitudes of third- and fourth-grade students , 2004 .

[15]  Carla C. Johnson.  Effective Professional Development and Change in Practice: Barriers Science Teachers Encounter and Implications for Reform , 2006 .

[16]  Making the Case for School-based Systemic Reform in Science Education , 2010 .

[17]  Robert E. Yager,et al.  Success of a Professional-Development Model in Assisting Teachers to Change Their Teaching to Match the More Emphasis Conditions Urged in the National Science Education Standards , 2006 .

[18]  John C. Wright,et al.  A Commentary on the Profound Changes Envisioned by the National Science Standards , 1998, Teachers College Record: The Voice of Scholarship in Education.

[19]  Jack C. Richards,et al.  Reflective Teaching in Second Language Classrooms: Teacher decision making , 1994 .

[20]  Carla C. Johnson.  Whole-School Collaborative Sustained Professional Development and Science Teacher Change: Signs of Progress , 2007 .

[21]  R. Slavin.  Cooperative Learning: Theory, Research and Practice , 1990 .

[22]  B. Crawford.  Embracing the essence of inquiry: New roles for science teachers , 2000 .

[23]  S. Wineburg,et al.  Toward a Theory of Teacher Community. , 2001 .

[24]  E. Soloway,et al.  A Collaborative Model for Helping Middle Grade Science Teachers Learn Project-Based Instruction , 1994, The Elementary School Journal.

[25]  Expanding the Use of the National Science Education Standards in Accomplishing Needed Reforms , 2006 .

[26]  Carla C. Johnson,et al.  Urban School Reform Enabled by Transformative Professional Development: Impact on Teacher Change and Student Learning of Science , 2010 .

[27]  Laura M. Desimone,et al.  Effects of Professional Development on Teachers’ Instruction: Results from a Three-year Longitudinal Study , 2002 .

[28]  Robert W. Lissitz,et al.  Estimating the Impact of Instructional Practices on Student Achievement in Science , 1999 .

[29]  Joseph Krajcik,et al.  Achieving standards in urban systemic reform: An example of a sixth grade project‐based science curriculum , 2004 .

[30]  Joseph Krajcik,et al.  Standardized Test Outcomes for Students Engaged in Inquiry-Based Science Curricula in the Context of Urban Reform. , 2008 .

[31]  Joseph Krajcik,et al.  Inquiry-based science in the middle grades: Assessment of learning in urban systemic reform , 2004 .

[32]  Heather C. Hill,et al.  Instructional Policy and Classroom Performance: The Mathematics Reform in California , 2000, Teachers College Record: The Voice of Scholarship in Education.

[33]  Thomas R. Guskey,et al.  Evaluating professional development , 1999 .

[34]  Allen Ruby,et al.  Improving science achievement at high-poverty urban middle schools†‡ , 2006 .

[35]  Joseph Krajcik,et al.  Performance of Students in Project-Based Science Classrooms on a National Measure of Science Achievement. , 2002 .

[36]  Sandra P. Horn,et al.  Teacher and Classroom Context Effects on Student Achievement: Implications for Teacher Evaluation , 1997 .

[37]  Carla C. Johnson.  An Examination of Effective Practice: Moving Toward Elimination of Achievement Gaps in Science , 2009 .

[38]  Bobby Jeanpierre,et al.  Characteristics of professional development that effect change in secondary science teachers' classroom practices , 2005 .

[39]  Ronald D. Anderson,et al.  The ideal of Standards and the reality of schools : Needed research , 2001 .

[40]  Iris R. Weiss,et al.  Can professional development make the vision of the standards a reality? The impact of the national science foundation's local systemic change through teacher enhancement initiative , 2007 .

[41]  Carla C. Johnson,et al.  Effective Teaching Results in Increased Science Achievement for All Students. , 2007 .

[42]  J. B. Kahle,et al.  Promoting Inquiry-Based Instructional Practice: The Longitudinal Impact of Professional Development in the Context of Systemic Reform , 2000 .

[43]  Joel C. Kuipers,et al.  Examining the effects of a highly rated science curriculum unit on diverse students: Results from a planning grant , 2005 .

[44]  Ralph T. Putnam,et al.  Teacher Learning: Implications of New Views of Cognition , 1997 .

[45]  S. Loucks-Horsley.  Designing Professional Development for Teachers of Science and Mathematics , 1997 .

[46]  S. Cooke,et al.  A Review of Literature on the Mentoring and Induction of Beginning Teachers with an Emphasis on the Retention and Renewal of Science Teachers. , 2003 .