Citizen Participation and Citizen Evaluation in Disaster Recovery

In April 1997, Grand Forks, North Dakota, and East Grand Forks, Minnesota, experienced a disastrous flood. Both cities have been textbook examples of success according to the Federal Emergency Management Agency. They have an updated infrastructure, paid for largely by the federal government. Their downtowns are on the road to recovery with new construction and businesses. The paths of the two cities have diverged in the social and political aftermath of the flood. East Grand Forks, following consultant suggestions, instituted extensive citizen participation initiatives. East Grand Forks has experienced political stability and citizen satisfaction. Grand Forks relied primarily on bureaucratic guidance to react to the disaster. Grand Forks has experienced changes in government structure, turnover of elected and appointed officials, and much less positive citizen evaluation. This study examines the effect of perceptions of citizen participation on the citizens’ evaluation of the success of the recovery.

[1]  Aaron Wildavsky,et al.  The Politics of the Budgetary Process. , 1965 .

[2]  Norton E. Long Power and Administration , 1949 .

[3]  J. M. Hansen The Political Economy of Group Membership , 1985, American Political Science Review.

[4]  F. E. Rourke,et al.  Bureaucracy, Politics and Public Policy , 1984 .

[5]  M. Rosenberg,et al.  The Logic of Survey Analysis. , 1968 .

[6]  Robert D. Putnam,et al.  Bowling alone: the collapse and revival of American community , 2000, CSCW '00.

[7]  Peter J. Robertson,et al.  The Role of Commitment in Collective Action: Comparing the Organizational Behavior and Rational Choice Perspectives , 1995 .

[8]  Timothy Beatley,et al.  After the Hurricane: Linking Recovery to Sustainable Development in the Caribbean , 1999 .

[9]  Camilla Stivers,et al.  Government Is Us: Public Administration in an Anti-Government Era , 1998 .

[10]  R. Putnam,et al.  Making Democracy Work: Civic Traditions in Modern Italy. , 1994 .

[11]  R. Kramer Government Is Us: Public Administration in an Anti‐Government Era , 1999 .

[12]  J. Gruber Controlling Bureaucracies: Dilemmas in Democratic Governance , 1986 .

[13]  M. Weber From Max Weber: Essays in sociology , 1946 .

[14]  P. Kemeny Power and Discontent , 1969 .

[15]  Steven J. Rosenstone,et al.  Mobilization, participation, and democracy in America , 1993 .

[16]  J. Rohr Ethics for Bureaucrats: An Essay on Law and Values, Second Edition , 1978 .

[17]  M. Kweit,et al.  Implementing citizen participation in a bureaucratic society: A contingency approach , 1981 .

[18]  Jan E. Leighley Group Membership and the Mobilization of Political Participation , 1996, The Journal of Politics.

[19]  J. Davis The Logic Of Causal Order , 1987 .

[20]  H. Simon,et al.  Administrative Behavior: A Study of Decision-Making Processes in Administrative Organization. , 1959 .

[21]  Christopher Kenny,et al.  Political Participation and Effects from the Social Environment , 1992 .

[22]  T. Tyler,et al.  Why People Obey the Law , 2021 .

[23]  P. Berke,et al.  Recovery after disaster: achieving sustainable development, mitigation and equity. , 1993, Disasters.

[24]  D. Moynihan Normative and Instrumental Perspectives on Public Participation , 2003 .

[25]  R. Warren,et al.  The community in America , 1964 .

[26]  Talcott Parsons,et al.  Max Weber, the theory of social and economic organization , 1948 .

[27]  Richard J. Stillman,et al.  Public administration: Concepts and cases , 1976 .

[28]  E. T. Jones Conducting political research , 1971 .

[29]  Thomas E. Drabek Alternative Patterns of Decision-Making in Emergent Disaster Response Networks , 1983 .

[30]  C. J. Uhlaner,et al.  Rational Turnout: The Neglected Role of Groups , 1989 .

[31]  E. Quarantelli,et al.  Response to Social Crisis and Disaster , 1977 .

[32]  M. Finnsdóttir,et al.  [Study in administration]. , 1972, Timarit Hjukrunarfelags Islands.

[33]  Saundra K. Schneider Flirting with Disaster: Public Management in Crisis Situations , 1995 .