The Power of Relative Rates Tests Depends on the Data

Abstract. One of the most useful features of molecular phylogenetic analyses is the potential for estimating dates of divergence of evolutionary lineages from the DNA of extant species. But lineage-specific variation in rate of molecular evolution complicates molecular dating, because a calibration rate estimated from one lineage may not be an accurate representation of the rate in other lineages. Many molecular dating studies use a ``clock test'' to identify and exclude sequences that vary in rate between lineages. However, these clock tests should not be relied upon without a critical examination of their effectiveness at removing rate variable sequences from any given data set, particularly with regard to the sequence length and number of variable sites. As an illustration of this problem we present a power test of a frequently employed triplet relative rates test. We conclude that (1) relative rates tests are unlikely to detect moderate levels of lineage-specific rate variation (where one lineage has a rate of molecular evolution 1.5 to 4.0 times the other) for most commonly used sequences in molecular dating analyses, and (2) this lack of power is likely to result in substantial error in the estimation of dates of divergence. As an example, we show that the well-studied rate difference between murid rodents and great apes will not be detected for many of the sequences used to date the divergence between these two lineages and that this failure to detect rate variation is likely to result in consistent overestimation the date of the rodent–primate split.

[1]  D. Penny,et al.  Spectral analysis of phylogenetic data , 1993 .

[2]  Michael J. Sanderson,et al.  A Nonparametric Approach to Estimating Divergence Times in the Absence of Rate Constancy , 1997 .

[3]  W. Li,et al.  Evidence for higher rates of nucleotide substitution in rodents than in man. , 1985, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[4]  Sudhir Kumar,et al.  Continental breakup and the ordinal diversification of birds and mammals , 1996, Nature.

[5]  B S Weir,et al.  Testing for equality of evolutionary rates. , 1992, Genetics.

[6]  Sudhir Kumar,et al.  Divergence time estimates for the early history of animal phyla and the origin of plants, animals and fungi , 1999, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences.

[7]  N. M. Brooke,et al.  A molecular timescale for vertebrate evolution , 1998, Nature.

[8]  J Krushkal,et al.  Rates of nucleotide substitution in primates and rodents and the generation-time effect hypothesis. , 1996, Molecular phylogenetics and evolution.

[9]  A. Wilson,et al.  Generation time and genomic evolution in primates. , 1973, Science.

[10]  Wen-Hsiung Li,et al.  Higher rates of amino acid substitution in rodents than in humans. , 1992, Molecular phylogenetics and evolution.

[11]  John C. Avise Molecular Markers, Natural History and Evolution , 1994, Springer US.

[12]  S. Strauss,et al.  Extensive variation in evolutionary rate of rbcL gene sequences among seed plants. , 1992, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[13]  Andrew Rambaut,et al.  Seq-Gen: an application for the Monte Carlo simulation of DNA sequence evolution along phylogenetic trees , 1997, Comput. Appl. Biosci..

[14]  S. Scherer The relative-rate test of the molecular clock hypothesis: a note of caution. , 1989, Molecular biology and evolution.

[15]  F. Tajima,et al.  Simple methods for testing the molecular evolutionary clock hypothesis. , 1993, Genetics.

[16]  Phillips,et al.  Growing up with dinosaurs: molecular dates and the mammalian radiation. , 1999, Trends in ecology & evolution.

[17]  P. Harvey,et al.  Metabolic rate, generation time, and the rate of molecular evolution in birds. , 1994, Molecular phylogenetics and evolution.

[18]  P. Gingerich Temporal scaling of molecular evolution in primates and other mammals. , 1986, Molecular biology and evolution.

[19]  S. Easteal,et al.  A mammalian molecular clock? , 1992, BioEssays : news and reviews in molecular, cellular and developmental biology.

[20]  A. Rambaut,et al.  Estimating divergence dates from molecular sequences. , 1998, Molecular biology and evolution.