Evaluating the uncertainty of Landsat-derived vegetation indices in quantifying forest fuel treatments using bi-temporal LiDAR data

Abstract Forest ecosystems in the American west have long been influenced by timber harvests and fire suppression, and recently through treatments that reduce fuel for fire management. Precisely quantifying the structural changes to forests caused by fuel treatments is an essential step to evaluate their impacts. Satellite imagery-derived vegetation indices, such as the normalized difference vegetation index (NDVI), have been widely used to map forest dynamics. However, uncertainties in using these vegetation indices to quantify forest structural changes have not been thoroughly studied, mainly due to the lack of wall-to-wall validation data. In this study we generated forest structural changes in aboveground biomass (AGB) and canopy cover as a result of fuel treatments using bi-temporal airborne light detection and ranging (LiDAR) data and field measurements in a mixed coniferous forest of northern Sierra Nevada, California, USA. These LiDAR-derived forest structural measures were used to evaluate the uncertainties of using Landsat-derived vegetation indices to quantify treatments. Our results confirmed that vegetation indices can accurately map the extents of forest disturbance and canopy cover changes caused by fuel treatments, but the accuracy in quantifying AGB changes varied by the pre-treatment forest densities and treatment intensity. Changes in vegetation indices had relatively weaker correlations (coefficient of determination   700 Mg/ha), than in forests with moderate-density (AGB between 100 Mg/ha and 700 Mg/ha) before the disturbances. Moreover, understory treatments (canopy height

[1]  S. Stephens,et al.  Novel characterization of landscape-level variability in historical vegetation structure. , 2015, Ecological applications : a publication of the Ecological Society of America.

[2]  R. Bales,et al.  Forest thinning impacts on the water balance of Sierra Nevada mixed‐conifer headwater basins , 2017 .

[3]  S. Goward,et al.  Dynamics of national forests assessed using the Landsat record: Case studies in eastern United States , 2009 .

[4]  D. R. Almeida,et al.  Enhancing of accuracy assessment for forest above-ground biomass estimates obtained from remote sensing via hypothesis testing and overfitting evaluation , 2017 .

[5]  C. Woodcock,et al.  Sources of bias and variability in long-term Landsat time series over Canadian boreal forests , 2016 .

[6]  Scott L. Stephens,et al.  Simulating Fire and Forest Dynamics for a Landscape Fuel Treatment Project in the Sierra Nevada , 2011, Forest Science.

[7]  Suming Jin,et al.  MODIS time-series imagery for forest disturbance detection and quantification of patch size effects , 2005 .

[8]  Maggi Kelly,et al.  Quantifying Ladder Fuels: A New Approach Using LiDAR , 2014 .

[9]  F. Zhao,et al.  Allometric equation choice impacts lidar-based forest biomass estimates: A case study from the Sierra National Forest, CA , 2012 .

[10]  Maggi Kelly,et al.  Evaluating short‐ and long‐term impacts of fuels treatments and simulated wildfire on an old‐forest species , 2015 .

[11]  W. Keeton,et al.  Disturbances and structural development of natural forest ecosystems with silvicultural implications, using Douglas-fir forests as an example , 2002 .

[12]  Jay D. Miller,et al.  Wildfire impacts on California spotted owl nesting habitat in the Sierra Nevada. , 2016 .

[13]  Michael A. Wulder,et al.  Characterizing the state and processes of change in a dynamic forest environment using hierarchical spatio-temporal segmentation , 2011 .

[14]  W. Cohen,et al.  North American forest disturbance mapped from a decadal Landsat record , 2008 .

[15]  K. Lim,et al.  Estimation of above ground forest biomass from airborne discrete return laser scanner data using canopy-based quantile estimators , 2004 .

[16]  Qin Ma,et al.  Comparison of Canopy Cover Estimations From Airborne LiDAR, Aerial Imagery, and Satellite Imagery , 2017, IEEE Journal of Selected Topics in Applied Earth Observations and Remote Sensing.

[17]  Maggi Kelly,et al.  Impact of Error in Lidar-Derived Canopy Height and Canopy Base Height on Modeled Wildfire Behavior in the Sierra Nevada, California, USA , 2017, Remote. Sens..

[18]  Nicole M. Vaillant,et al.  Multi-temporal LiDAR and Landsat quantification of fire-induced changes to forest structure , 2017 .

[19]  Michael A. Wulder,et al.  Opening the archive: How free data has enabled the science and monitoring promise of Landsat , 2012 .

[20]  Joanne C. White,et al.  A nationwide annual characterization of 25 years of forest disturbance and recovery for Canada using Landsat time series , 2017 .

[21]  Carl N. Skinner,et al.  Basic principles of forest fuel reduction treatments , 2005 .

[22]  Michael Dixon,et al.  Google Earth Engine: Planetary-scale geospatial analysis for everyone , 2017 .

[23]  A. Skidmore,et al.  Narrow band vegetation indices overcome the saturation problem in biomass estimation , 2004 .

[24]  Felix Morsdorf,et al.  Estimation of Canopy Cover, Gap Fraction and Leaf Area Index with Airborne Laser Scanning , 2014 .

[25]  B. Gao NDWI—A normalized difference water index for remote sensing of vegetation liquid water from space , 1996 .

[26]  S. Stephens,et al.  Accessible light detection and ranging: estimating large tree density for habitat identification , 2016 .

[27]  W. Cohen,et al.  Testing a Landsat-based approach for mapping disturbance causality in U.S. forests , 2017 .

[28]  Scott L. Stephens,et al.  Fire Climbing in the Forest: A Semiqualitative, Semiquantitative Approach to Assessing Ladder Fuel Hazards , 2007 .

[29]  Caixia Liu,et al.  Quantifying Multi-Decadal Change of Planted Forest Cover Using Airborne LiDAR and Landsat Imagery , 2016, Remote. Sens..

[30]  B. Holben Characteristics of maximum-value composite images from temporal AVHRR data , 1986 .

[31]  Shengli Tao,et al.  Spatial distribution of forest aboveground biomass in China: Estimation through combination of spaceborne lidar, optical imagery, and forest inventory data , 2015 .

[32]  S. Goward,et al.  An automated approach for reconstructing recent forest disturbance history using dense Landsat time series stacks , 2010 .

[33]  R. Birdsey,et al.  National-Scale Biomass Estimators for United States Tree Species , 2003, Forest Science.

[34]  Joanne C. White,et al.  Lidar sampling for large-area forest characterization: A review , 2012 .

[35]  G. Asner,et al.  Mapping tropical forest carbon: Calibrating plot estimates to a simple LiDAR metric , 2014 .

[36]  Maggi Kelly,et al.  Predicting Surface Fuel Models and Fuel Metrics Using Lidar and CIR Imagery in a Dense, Mountainous Forest , 2013 .

[37]  Q. Guo,et al.  Effects of Topographic Variability and Lidar Sampling Density on Several DEM Interpolation Methods , 2010 .

[38]  D. Saah,et al.  A Word to the Wise: Advice for Scientists Engaged in Collaborative Adaptive Management , 2017, Environmental Management.

[39]  Terje Gobakken,et al.  LiDAR-supported estimation of change in forest biomass with time-invariant regression models , 2015 .

[40]  R. Ray,et al.  Emerging Stress and Relative Resiliency of Giant Sequoia Groves Experiencing Multiyear Dry Periods in a Warming Climate , 2017 .

[41]  E. Crist A TM Tasseled Cap equivalent transformation for reflectance factor data , 1985 .

[42]  Jason J. Moghaddas,et al.  Fire treatment effects on vegetation structure, fuels, and potential fire severity in western U.S. forests. , 2009, Ecological applications : a publication of the Ecological Society of America.

[43]  Cheng Wang,et al.  Utility of multitemporal lidar for forest and carbon monitoring: Tree growth, biomass dynamics, and carbon flux , 2018 .

[44]  Mark E Harmon,et al.  Forest fuel reduction alters fire severity and long-term carbon storage in three Pacific Northwest ecosystems. , 2009, Ecological applications : a publication of the Ecological Society of America.

[45]  Zhe Zhu,et al.  Object-based cloud and cloud shadow detection in Landsat imagery , 2012 .

[46]  C. Field,et al.  Relationships Between NDVI, Canopy Structure, and Photosynthesis in Three Californian Vegetation Types , 1995 .

[47]  Joanne C. White,et al.  Remote Sensing Technologies for Enhancing Forest Inventories: A Review , 2016 .

[48]  Maggi Kelly,et al.  Object-Based Image Analysis of Downed Logs in Disturbed Forested Landscapes Using Lidar , 2011, Remote. Sens..

[49]  E. Næsset,et al.  Estimating tree heights and number of stems in young forest stands using airborne laser scanner data , 2001 .

[50]  Chengquan Huang,et al.  Forest disturbance across the conterminous United States from 1985-2012: The emerging dominance of forest decline , 2016 .

[51]  N. Benson,et al.  Landscape Assessment: Ground measure of severity, the Composite Burn Index; and Remote sensing of severity, the Normalized Burn Ratio , 2006 .

[52]  Limin Yang,et al.  Derivation of a tasselled cap transformation based on Landsat 7 at-satellite reflectance , 2002 .

[53]  S. Popescu,et al.  A voxel-based lidar method for estimating crown base height for deciduous and pine trees , 2008 .

[54]  Maggi Kelly,et al.  Mapping forests with Lidar provides flexible, accurate data with many uses , 2015 .

[55]  Alan H. Strahler,et al.  Assessing general relationships between aboveground biomass and vegetation structure parameters for improved carbon estimate from lidar remote sensing , 2009 .

[56]  Guang Zheng,et al.  Retrieving Leaf Area Index (LAI) Using Remote Sensing: Theories, Methods and Sensors , 2009, Sensors.

[57]  C. Justice,et al.  High-Resolution Global Maps of 21st-Century Forest Cover Change , 2013, Science.

[58]  A. Huete,et al.  Optical-Biophysical Relationships of Vegetation Spectra without Background Contamination , 2000 .

[59]  Scott L. Stephens,et al.  U.S. federal fire and forest policy: emphasizing resilience in dry forests , 2016 .

[60]  Chengquan Huang,et al.  Improving estimates of forest disturbance by combining observations from Landsat time series with U.S. Forest Service Forest Inventory and Analysis data , 2014 .

[61]  E. Næsset Determination of mean tree height of forest stands using airborne laser scanner data , 1997 .

[62]  Zhiqiang Yang,et al.  Detecting trends in forest disturbance and recovery using yearly Landsat time series: 1. LandTrendr — Temporal segmentation algorithms , 2010 .

[63]  Qinghua Guo,et al.  Quantifying individual tree growth and tree competition using bi-temporal airborne laser scanning data: a case study in the Sierra Nevada Mountains, California , 2018, Int. J. Digit. Earth.

[64]  M. Nilsson Estimation of tree heights and stand volume using an airborne lidar system , 1996 .

[65]  C. Tucker Red and photographic infrared linear combinations for monitoring vegetation , 1979 .

[66]  Eric S. Kasischke,et al.  Seasonal and topographic effects on estimating fire severity from Landsat TM/ETM+ data , 2008 .

[67]  E. Knapp,et al.  Efficacy of variable density thinning and prescribed fire for restoring forest heterogeneity to mixed-conifer forest in the central Sierra Nevada, CA , 2017 .

[68]  J. Battles,et al.  The effects of forest management on plant species diversity in a Sierran conifer forest , 2001 .

[69]  Xuexia Chen,et al.  A simple and effective radiometric correction method to improve landscape change detection across sensors and across time , 2005 .

[70]  Ben Somers,et al.  Assessing post-fire vegetation recovery using red-near infrared vegetation indices: Accounting for background and vegetation variability , 2012 .

[71]  Maggi Kelly,et al.  Lidar with multi-temporal MODIS provide a means to upscale predictions of forest biomass , 2015 .

[72]  M. Herold,et al.  Robust monitoring of small-scale forest disturbances in a tropical montane forest using Landsat time series , 2015 .

[73]  Maggi Kelly,et al.  Airborne Lidar-derived volume metrics for aboveground biomass estimation: A comparative assessment for conifer stands , 2014 .

[74]  James P. Verdin,et al.  A five‐year analysis of MODIS NDVI and NDWI for grassland drought assessment over the central Great Plains of the United States , 2007 .

[75]  E. Næsset,et al.  Estimating tree height and tree crown properties using airborne scanning laser in a boreal nature reserve , 2002 .

[76]  David J. Parsons,et al.  Impact of fire suppression on a mixed-conifer forest , 1979 .

[77]  E. Knapp,et al.  Drought, Tree Mortality, and Wildfire in Forests Adapted to Frequent Fire , 2018 .

[78]  M. Seamans,et al.  Effects of forest management on California Spotted Owls: implications for reducing wildfire risk in fire‐prone forests. , 2014, Ecological applications : a publication of the Ecological Society of America.

[79]  Maggi Kelly,et al.  Forest fuel treatment detection using multi-temporal airborne lidar data and high-resolution aerial imagery: a case study in the Sierra Nevada Mountains, California , 2016 .

[80]  Jay D. Miller,et al.  Quantifying burn severity in a heterogeneous landscape with a relative version of the delta Normalized Burn Ratio (dNBR) , 2007 .

[81]  Jungho Im,et al.  Forest biomass estimation from airborne LiDAR data using machine learning approaches , 2012 .

[82]  N. Coops,et al.  Estimating canopy structure of Douglas-fir forest stands from discrete-return LiDAR , 2007, Trees.

[83]  John F. Caratti,et al.  FIREMON: Fire Effects Monitoring and Inventory System , 2012 .

[84]  M. Wimberly,et al.  Assessment of Forest Degradation in Vietnam Using Landsat Time Series Data , 2017 .

[85]  Eric P. Crist,et al.  A Physically-Based Transformation of Thematic Mapper Data---The TM Tasseled Cap , 1984, IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing.

[86]  O. Viedma,et al.  Modeling rates of ecosystem recovery after fires by using landsat TM data , 1997 .

[87]  Michele Dalponte,et al.  Predicting stem diameters and aboveground biomass of individual trees using remote sensing data , 2018 .

[88]  M. Wulder,et al.  Mapping wildfire and clearcut harvest disturbances in boreal forests with Landsat time series data , 2011 .

[89]  Xiaohuan Xi,et al.  Fusion of airborne LiDAR data and hyperspectral imagery for aboveground and belowground forest biomass estimation , 2017 .

[90]  Matti Maltamo,et al.  Airborne discrete-return LIDAR data in the estimation of vertical canopy cover, angular canopy closure and leaf area index , 2011 .

[91]  S. Stephens,et al.  Impacts of fire exclusion and recent managed fire on forest structure in old growth Sierra Nevada mixed-conifer forests , 2011 .

[92]  Hyunseok Kim,et al.  Effects of thinning intensities on tree water use, growth, and resultant water use efficiency of 50-year-old Pinus koraiensis forest over four years , 2018 .

[93]  E. Knapp,et al.  Long-term overstory and understory change following logging and fire exclusion in a Sierra Nevada mixed-conifer forest , 2013 .

[94]  N. Delbart,et al.  Remote sensing of spring phenology in boreal regions: A free of snow-effect method using NOAA-AVHRR and SPOT-VGT data (1982-2004) , 2006 .

[95]  Yanjun Su,et al.  Improved progressive TIN densification filtering algorithm for airborne LiDAR data in forested areas , 2016 .