“Publish or Perish” as citation metrics used to analyze scientific output in the humanities: International case studies in economics, geography, social sciences, philosophy, and history

Traditionally, the most commonly used source of bibliometric data is the Thomson ISI Web of Knowledge, in particular the (Social) Science Citation Index and the Journal Citation Reports, which provide the yearly Journal Impact Factors. This database used for the evaluation of researchers is not advantageous in the humanities, mainly because books, conference papers, and non-English journals, which are an important part of scientific activity, are not (well) covered. This paper presents the use of an alternative source of data, Google Scholar, and its benefits in calculating citation metrics in the humanities. Because of its broader range of data sources, the use of Google Scholar generally results in more comprehensive citation coverage in the humanities. This presentation compares and analyzes some international case studies with ISI Web of Knowledge and Google Scholar. The fields of economics, geography, social sciences, philosophy, and history are focused on to illustrate the differences of results between these two databases. To search for relevant publications in the Google Scholar database, the use of “Publish or Perish” and of CleanPoP, which the author developed to clean the results, are compared.

[1]  P. Jacsó As we may search : Comparison of major features of the Web of Science, Scopus, and Google Scholar citation-based and citation-enhanced databases , 2005 .

[2]  朱佳鸣 Google Scholar Beta检索性能的初步分析 , 2005 .

[3]  Lei Wang,et al.  Three options for citation tracking: Google Scholar, Scopus and Web of Science , 2006, Biomedical digital libraries.

[4]  J. E. Hirsch,et al.  An index to quantify an individual's scientific research output , 2005, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA.

[5]  E. Garfield Citation indexes for science. A new dimension in documentation through association of ideas. 1955. , 1955, International journal of epidemiology.

[6]  Dana L. Roth,et al.  The emergence of competitors to the Science Citation Index and the Web of Science , 2005 .

[7]  Mike Thelwall,et al.  Sources of Google Scholar citations outside the Science Citation Index: A comparison between four science disciplines , 2008, Scientometrics.

[8]  Philipp Mayr,et al.  An exploratory study of Google Scholar , 2007, Online Inf. Rev..

[9]  Anne-Wil Harzing,et al.  Google Scholar as a new source for citation analysis , 2008 .

[10]  Daniel Pauly,et al.  Equivalence of results from two citation analyses: Thomson ISI's Citation Index and Google's Scholar service , 2005 .

[11]  Lokman I. Meho,et al.  A New Era in Citation and Bibliometric Analyses: Web of Science, Scopus, and Google Scholar , 2006, ArXiv.

[12]  Jeroen Bosman,et al.  Scopus reviewed and compared: the coverage and functionality of the citation database Scopus, including comparisons with Web of Science and Google Scholar , 2006 .

[13]  Chantal Wouters,et al.  An exploratory study , 2003 .

[14]  Nisa Bakkalbasi,et al.  An Examination of Citation Counts in a New Scholarly Communication Environment , 2005, D Lib Mag..

[15]  Declan Butler,et al.  Science searches shift up a gear as Google starts Scholar engine , 2004, Nature.