CENTRALIZATION, ORGANIZATIONAL STRATEGY AND PUBLIC SERVICE PERFORMANCE

We test the separate and joint effects of centralization and organizational strategy on the performance of 53 UK public service organizations. Centralization is measured as both the hierarchy of authority and the degree of participation in decision making, whereas strategy is measured as the extent to which service providers are prospectors, defenders, and reactors. We find that centralization has no independent effect on service performance, even when controlling for prior performance, service expenditure, and external constraints. However, the impact of centralization is contingent on the strategic orientation of organizations. Centralized decision making works best in conjunction with defending, and decentralized decision making works best in organizations that emphasize prospecting.

[1]  J. S. Long,et al.  Using Heteroscedasticity Consistent Standard Errors in the Linear Regression Model , 2000 .

[2]  H. Simon,et al.  Administrative Behavior: A Study of Decision-Making Processes in Administrative Organization. , 1959 .

[3]  George Alexander Boyne,et al.  Public management reform and organizational performance: An empirical assessment of the U.K. Labour government's public service improvement strategy , 2006 .

[4]  N. Carter,et al.  A Comparison of Centralizationl Decentralization of Decision Making Concepts and Measures , 1984 .

[5]  R E Miles,et al.  Organizational strategy, structure, and process. , 1978, Academy of management review. Academy of Management.

[6]  Roger Mansfield,et al.  Relationships of perceptions of organizational climate to organizational structure, context, and hierarchical position. , 1973 .

[7]  J. Pennings,et al.  Structural conditions of intraorganizational power , 1974 .

[8]  M. Aiken,et al.  Routine Technology, Social Structure, and Organization Goals , 1969 .

[9]  Dennis J. Palumbo,et al.  Street-Wise Social Policy: Resolving the Dilemma of Street-Level Influence and Successful Implementation , 1990 .

[10]  K. Meier,et al.  Ode to Luther Gulick , 2000 .

[11]  S. Hart,et al.  How strategy‐making processes can make a difference , 1994 .

[12]  Robert Dewar,et al.  An examination of the reliability and validity of the Aiken and Hage scales of centralization, formalization and task routineness / BEBR No. 387 , 1977 .

[13]  Richard M. Walker,et al.  Using multiple informants in public administration: revisiting the managerial values and actions debate , 2004 .

[14]  Alfred D. Chandler.  Strategy and Structure: Chapters in the History of the Industrial Enterprise , 1962 .

[15]  S. Shortell,et al.  Changing generic strategies: Likelihood, direction, and performance implications , 1989 .

[16]  F. Castles,et al.  Does politics matter? , 1997 .

[17]  P. Adler,et al.  Two Types of Bureaucracy: Enabling and Coercive , 1996 .

[18]  Jack Fiorito,et al.  A structural contingency approach to bureaucracy and democracy in U.S. national unions. , 1997 .

[19]  Frank Fischer,et al.  The Case for Bureaucracy: A Public Administration Polemic.@@@Bureaucratic Power in Society. , 1985 .

[20]  M. Mcconkie,et al.  Papers on the Science of Administration , 2007 .

[21]  Marshall W. Meyer,et al.  Power in Organizations. , 1982 .

[22]  George Alexander Boyne,et al.  Plans, performance information and accountability: the case of Best Value , 2002 .

[23]  John A. Wagner,et al.  Participation's Effects On Performance and Satisfaction: A Reconsideration Of Research Evidence , 1994 .

[24]  L. Urwick.  Papers on the science of administration , 1938 .

[25]  Paul Kline,et al.  An easy guide to factor analysis , 1993 .

[26]  R. McDaniel,et al.  Participation in Strategic Decision Making: The Role of Organizational Predisposition and Issue Interpretation* , 1998 .

[27]  M. Aiken,et al.  Relationship of centralization to other structural properties. , 1967 .

[28]  K. Meier,et al.  Public Management in Intergovernmental Networks: Matching Structural Networks and Managerial Networking , 2004 .

[29]  Richard M. Walker,et al.  Public Service Performance: Subjective and objective measures of organizational performance: An empirical exploration , 2006 .

[30]  S. Zahra,et al.  Business strategy, technology policy and firm performance , 1993 .

[31]  C. C. Snow,et al.  Strategy, Distinctive Competence, and Organizational Performance. , 1980 .

[32]  William G. Ouchi,et al.  Markets, Bureaucracies, and Clans. , 1980 .

[33]  Bradley E. Wright,et al.  Connecting the Dots in Public Management: Political Environment, Organizational Goal Ambiguity, and the Public Manager's Role Ambiguity , 2006 .

[34]  B. Loasby.  The External Control of Organizations. A Resource Dependence Perspective , 1979 .

[35]  David J. Miller,et al.  Configurations of strategy and structure: Towards a synthesis , 1986 .

[36]  J. Child.  Organization Structure and Strategies of Control: A Replication of the Aston Study , 1972 .

[37]  R. John.  Linear Statistical Models: An Applied Approach , 1986 .

[38]  William H. Glick,et al.  Fit, Equifinality, and Organizational Effectiveness: A Test of Two Configurational Theories , 1993 .

[39]  J. McMahon.  Participative and Power-Equalized Organizational Systems , 1976 .

[40]  T. Holland.  Organizational structure and institutional care. , 1973, Journal of health and social behavior.

[41]  D. R. Dalton,et al.  Organization Structure and Performance: A Critical Review , 1980 .

[42]  A. Pettigrew.  The politics of organizational decision-making , 1973 .

[43]  Laurence J. O'Toole,et al.  Managerial Strategies and Behavior in Networks: A Model with Evidence from U.S. Public Education * , 2001 .

[44]  B. Bozeman.  Organization structure and the effectiveness of public agencies , 1982 .

[45]  G. Vinten.  Public Management Reform. A Comparative Analysis , 2000 .

[46]  E. Ziegel,et al.  Linear Statistical Models: An Applied Approach. , 1992 .

[47]  Norma M. Riccucci.  How Management Matters: Street-Level Bureaucrats and Welfare Reform , 2005 .

[48]  B. Avolio,et al.  Effects of Leadership Style and Followers' Cultural Orientation on Performance in Group and Individual Task Conditions , 1999 .

[49]  A. Tannenbaum.  Control in Organizations: Individual Adjustment and Organizational Performance , 1962 .

[50]  Sanjay K. Pandey,et al.  Testing How Management Matters in an Era of Government by Performance Management , 2004 .

[51]  David A. Whetten,et al.  Coping with Incompatible Expectations: An Integrated View of Role Conflict. , 1978 .

[52]  H. William Vroman,et al.  Reinventing Government: How the Entrepreneurial Spirit is Transforming the Public Sector , 1994 .

[53]  D. Otley,et al.  The design of organizations , 1990 .

[54]  J. Scott Armstrong,et al.  Estimating nonresponse bias in mail surveys. , 1977 .

[55]  D. Tjosvold,et al.  Effects of student participation in classroom decision making on attitudes, peer interaction, motivation, and learning. , 1980 .

[56]  Hettie A. Richardson,et al.  Does Decentralization Make a Difference for the Organization? An Examination of the Boundary Conditions Circumbscribing Decentralized Decision-Making and Organizational Financial Performance , 2002 .

[57]  George Alexander Boyne,et al.  Strategy Content and Public Service Organizations , 2004 .

[58]  Bradley L. Kirkman,et al.  Beyond Self-Management: Antecedents and Consequences of Team Empowerment , 1999 .

[59]  C. Mills,et al.  The Theory of Social and Economic Organization , 1948 .

[60]  W. Niskanen.  Bureaucracy and representative government , 1971 .

[61]  P. Y. Martin,et al.  Bureaucracy, size, and staff expectations for client independence in halfway houses. , 1977, Journal of health and social behavior.

[62]  D. Yates,et al.  Street-Level Bureaucracy: Dilemmas of the Individual in Public Services , 1981, Michigan Law Review.

[63]  C. Glisson,et al.  Productivity and efficiency in human service organizations as related to structure, size, and age. , 1980, Academy of Management journal. Academy of Management.

[64]  J. M. Stevens,et al.  Managerial Strategies in Municipal Government Organizations , 1983 .

[65]  Patrick J. Wolf.  A Case Survey of Bureaucratic Effectiveness in U.S. Cabinet Agencies: Preliminary Results , 1993 .

[66]  D. Pugh,et al.  Dimensions of Organization Structure , 1968 .

[67]  W. Bodmer.  Principles of Scientific Management , 1993, FASEB journal : official publication of the Federation of American Societies for Experimental Biology.

[68]  M. Finnsdóttir,et al.  [Study in administration]. , 1972, Timarit Hjukrunarfelags Islands.

[69]  Laurence J. O'Toole,et al.  Modeling the impact of public management: implications of structural context , 1999 .

[70]  George A. Boyne,et al.  Sources of public service improvement: a critical review and research agenda , 2003 .

[71]  B. C. Reimann,et al.  Task Environment, Decentralization and Organizational Effectiveness , 1973 .

[72]  Richard Batley,et al.  The Changing Role of Government: The Reform of Public Services in Developing Countries , 2004 .

[73]  Steven Maynard-Moody,et al.  Cops, Teachers, Counselors: Stories from the Front Lines of Public Service , 2003 .

[74]  F. Fiedler,et al.  Correlates of Performance in Community Colleges , 1974 .

[75]  Luis R. Gomez-Mejia,et al.  Structure and process of diversification, compensation strategy, and firm performance , 1992 .

[76]  F. Thompson.  Street-Level Bureaucracy: Dilemmas of the Individual in Public Services , 1983 .

[77]  W. LaFollette,et al.  Perceived Organizational Structure And Alienation Among Management Trainees , 1977 .

[78]  M. Aiken,et al.  Organizational interdependence and intra-organizational structure. , 1968 .