The nature of science: A perspective from the philosophy of science

[1]  Randy L. Bell,et al.  How great is the disagreement about the nature of science: A response to Alters , 1997 .

[2]  Brian Alters,et al.  Whose nature of science , 1997 .

[3]  M. R. Matthews,et al.  A Bibliography for Philosophy and Constructivism in Science Education , 1997 .

[4]  T. Kuhn.  The structure of scientific revolutions, 3rd ed. , 1996 .

[5]  Katherine Ralls,et al.  But Is It Science? , 1995, Conservation biology : the journal of the Society for Conservation Biology.

[6]  Richard Mentock,et al.  Science and anti-science , 1994, Nature.

[7]  M. R. Matthews.  Science teaching : the role of history and philosophy of science , 1994 .

[8]  Alexander Rosenberg,et al.  Instrumental Biology, Or, The Disunity Of Science , 1994 .

[9]  Anton E. Lawson,et al.  Deductive reasoning, brain maturation, and science concept acquisition: Are they linked? , 1993 .

[10]  M. Lederman.  Structuring feminist science , 1993 .

[11]  Anton E. Lawson,et al.  The role of hypothetico-deductive reasoning and physical analogues of molecular interactions in conceptual change , 1993 .

[12]  M. R. Matthews,et al.  Constructivism and science education: Some epistemological problems , 1993 .

[13]  H. Siegel.  Naturalized philosophy of science and natural science education , 1993, Science & Education.

[14]  S. Rosser.  Are there feminist methodologies appropriate for the natural sciences and do they make a difference , 1992 .

[15]  P. Thagard,et al.  Analogy, Explanation, and Education. , 1992 .

[16]  M. R. Matthews.  The History and Philosophy of Science in Science Teacher Education , 1991 .

[17]  E. Brody.  Science as Social Knowledge. Values and Objectivity in Scientific Inquiry , 1990 .

[18]  J. Kelly.  Science for All Americans (A Project 2061 Report on Literacy Goals in Science, Mathematics, and Technology) American Association for the Advancement of Science , 1990 .

[19]  J. Primack,et al.  Project 2061: Science for All Americans. , 1989, The Physiologist.

[20]  Gary James Jason,et al.  The Logic of Scientific Discovery , 1988 .

[21]  I. Hacking,et al.  How Experiments End , 1989 .

[22]  G. Bitter.  Government Involvement in Math and Science , 1987 .

[23]  Larry Laudan,et al.  Science and Values , 1986 .

[24]  Arthur Fine,et al.  The shaky game , 1986 .

[25]  R. Duschl.  Science Education and Philosophy of Science Twenty‐Five Years of Mutually Exclusive Development , 1985 .

[26]  P. Kitcher.  Good Science, Bad Science, Dreadful Science, and Pseudoscience. , 1985 .

[27]  A. Pickering.  Constructing Quarks: A Sociological History of Particle Physics , 1985 .

[28]  Richard N. Boyd,et al.  On the current status of the issue of scientific realism , 1983 .

[29]  Gerald Vision.  Primary and secondary qualities: An essay in epistemology , 1982 .

[30]  S. Shapin.  Laboratory life. The social construction of scientific facts , 1981, Medical History.

[31]  Bas C. van Fraassen,et al.  The Scientific Image , 1980 .

[32]  Imre Lakatos,et al.  The Methodology of Scientific Research Programmes , 1978 .

[33]  L. Laudan.  Progress and Its Problems , 1977 .

[34]  Lewontin Rc,et al.  Annotation: the analysis of variance and the analysis of causes. , 1974 .

[35]  Michele A. Betts,et al.  Feminism and Science , 1971 .

[36]  Mekritt E. Kimball.  Understanding the nature of science: A comparison of scientists and science teachers , 1967 .

[37]  D. Struik,et al.  The Mechanization of the World Picture. , 1963 .

[38]  T. Kuhn,et al.  The Structure of Scientific Revolutions. , 1964 .

[39]  E. J. Dijksterhuis,et al.  The Mechanization of the World Picture , 1962 .

[40]  Grover Maxwell,et al.  The Ontological Status of Theoretical Entities , 1962 .

[41]  Ernest Nagel,et al.  The Structure of Science , 1962 .

[42]  M. Kendall,et al.  The Logic of Scientific Discovery. , 1959 .