Wireless brain computer interfaces enabling synchronized optogenetics and electrophysiology

This paper presents different miniature wireless brain computer interfaces (BCI) enabling synchronized optogenetics and electrophysiology recording for various experimental conditions. These devices, which are entirely built using commercial off-the-shelf components, are validated in-vivo with small transgenic mice. First, a system including 32 electrophysiological recording channels and up to 32 high-power optical stimulation channels is presented. It can process 32 neuronal signals in parallel with high compression ratio using an embedded digital field-programmable gate array (FPGA) signal processor performing spike detection and data compression in-situ. Then, an advanced version featuring equivalent characteristics, but having the third of the size and the weight is presented. The design of a third system dedicated to small freely moving animals is presented. It includes 4 electrophysiological recording channels and 1 high-power optical stimulation channel. In-vivo result obtained in freely moving mice with this system are reported. This latter system performs aggressive data reduction using a resource optimized spike detector running on a low-power microcontroller unit. Finally, a multichannel optical stimulator operating within a network of up to 6 active devices is presented for enabling optogenetic behavioral experiments with several mice at once. These different wireless BCI all provide a multimodal access to brain activity through optogenetics and large-scale electrophysiology.

[1]  Scott K. Arfin,et al.  Wireless neural stimulation in freely behaving small animals. , 2009, Journal of neurophysiology.

[2]  A. Gittis,et al.  Mechanisms of sustained high firing rates in two classes of vestibular nucleus neurons: differential contributions of resurgent Na, Kv3, and BK currents. , 2010, Journal of neurophysiology.

[3]  Thomas J. Davidson,et al.  In vivo optogenetic stimulation of the rodent central nervous system. , 2015, Journal of visualized experiments : JoVE.

[4]  Patrick D. Wolf,et al.  Evaluation of spike-detection algorithms fora brain-machine interface application , 2004, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.

[5]  Lei Yao,et al.  Neural recording front-end IC using action potential detection and analog buffer with digital delay for data compression , 2013, 2013 35th Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society (EMBC).

[6]  Aleksey Pesterev,et al.  Embedded Neural Recording With TinyOS-Based Wireless-Enabled Processor Modules , 2010, IEEE Transactions on Neural Systems and Rehabilitation Engineering.

[7]  Suzie Dufour,et al.  Optrodes for combined optogenetics and electrophysiology in live animals , 2015, Neurophotonics.

[8]  G. Buzsáki,et al.  Tools for probing local circuits: high-density silicon probes combined with optogenetics , 2015, Neuron.

[9]  Benoit Gosselin,et al.  A wireless and batteryless neural headstage with optical stimulation and electrophysiological recording , 2013, 2013 35th Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society (EMBC).

[10]  B. Gosselin,et al.  Comparison of low-power biopotential processors for on-the-fly spike detection , 2015, 2015 IEEE International Symposium on Circuits and Systems (ISCAS).

[11]  Yves De Koninck,et al.  An optimized adaptive spike detector for behavioural experiments , 2016, 2016 IEEE International Symposium on Circuits and Systems (ISCAS).

[12]  Yasir Suhail,et al.  B-Spline vs. Lifting Architecture for Neuroprosthetic Devices , 2006, 2006 IEEE International Conference on Electro/Information Technology.

[13]  Yves De Koninck,et al.  A Wireless Headstage for Combined Optogenetics and Multichannel Electrophysiological Recording , 2017, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Circuits and Systems.

[14]  M. Sawan,et al.  An Ultra Low-Power CMOS Automatic Action Potential Detector , 2009, IEEE Transactions on Neural Systems and Rehabilitation Engineering.