An approach for modeling long flexible bodies with application to railroad dynamics

Considering track flexibility in railroad vehicle simulations can lead to improved results. In modeling a railroad vehicle as a multibody system, track flexibility can be incorporated by using the floating frame of reference formulation (FFRF), which describes rail deformations in terms of shape functions defined in the track body frame of reference. However, the FFRF method is subject to two serious shortcomings, namely: it uses unreal track boundary conditions to calculate shape functions and requires a large number of functions to describe deformation. These shortcomings can be circumvented by defining shape functions in the trajectory frame of reference. Based on this notion, a new form of FFRF that can be used to describe the dynamics of long bodies subjected to moving loads (cable cars, zip-lines, elevator guides, pantograph catenary mechanism, etc.) was developed here. The shape functions selected in this work are based on the steady deformation exhibited by a beam on a Winkler foundation under the action of a moving load. However, other sets of shape functions more appropriate for transient dynamics are suggested. The definition of the deformation shape functions in a frame that moves with respect to the flexible body produces new terms in the generalized inertia forces of the flexible track. The proposed approach was applied to an unsuspended wheelset traveling on a tangent track supported on an elastic foundation. The results thus obtained under variable foundation stiffness conditions are discussed and comparisons made with the case of a rigid track. The new approach is also compared with the moving mass problem as solved with the mode superposition method.

[1]  Andrei V. Metrikine,et al.  Periodically supported beam on a visco-elastic layer as a model for dynamic analysis of a high-speed railway track , 2003 .

[2]  S Das,et al.  Experimental investigation on the influence of SiC particulate reinforcement in aluminium alloy composites , 2008 .

[3]  M. Géradin,et al.  Modelling of superelements in mechanism analysis , 1991 .

[4]  M. Géradin,et al.  Flexible Multibody Dynamics: A Finite Element Approach , 2001 .

[5]  Ahmed A. Shabana,et al.  Application of the Absolute Nodal Coordinate Formulation to Large Rotation and Large Deformation Problems , 1998 .

[6]  A. Mallik,et al.  Steady-state response of an elastically supported infinite beam to a moving load , 2006 .

[7]  Klaus Knothe,et al.  Modelling of Railway Track and Vehicle/Track Interaction at High Frequencies , 1993 .

[8]  R. V. Dukkipati,et al.  Idealized steady state interaction between railway vehicle and track , 1999 .

[9]  Dmitry Pogorelov,et al.  Freight car models and their computer-aided dynamic analysis , 2009 .

[10]  Ross A. Clark,et al.  An Investigation into the Dynamic Effects on the Track of Wheelflats on Railway Vehicles , 1979 .

[11]  Hiroyuki Sugiyama,et al.  Railroad Vehicle Dynamics: A Computational Approach , 2007 .

[12]  Shirish P. Patil.  Response of Infinite Railroad Track to Vibrating Mass , 1988 .

[13]  J. Kalker,et al.  On the rolling contact of two elastic bodies in the presence of dry friction , 1967 .

[14]  Ahmed A. Shabana,et al.  Flexible Multibody Dynamics: Review of Past and Recent Developments , 1997 .

[15]  Hideo Saito,et al.  Steady-State Vibrations of a Beam on a Pasternak Foundation for Moving Loads , 1980 .

[16]  Monica Malvezzi,et al.  Determination of wheel–rail contact points with semianalytic methods , 2008 .

[17]  Peter Eberhard,et al.  A two-step approach for model reduction in flexible multibody dynamics , 2007 .

[18]  R. Cavin,et al.  Hamilton's principle - Finite-element methods and flexible body dynamics , 1977 .

[19]  Jens C. O. Nielsen,et al.  Simulation of dynamic train–track interaction with state-dependent track properties , 2004 .

[20]  Wan-Suk Yoo,et al.  Dynamics of Flexible Mechanical Systems Using Vibration and Static Correction Modes , 1986 .

[21]  K. Johnson.  Contact Mechanics: Frontmatter , 1985 .

[22]  Andrei V. Metrikine,et al.  Analytical study of the dynamic response of an embedded railway track to a moving load , 2003 .

[23]  L Fryba,et al.  VIBRATION OF SOLIDS AND STRUCTURES UNDER MOVING LOADS (3RD EDITION) , 1999 .

[24]  Ahmed A. Shabana,et al.  Application of deformable-body mean axis to flexible multibody system dynamics , 1986 .

[25]  Louis Jezequel.  Response of Periodic Systems to a Moving Load , 1981 .

[26]  Alberto Cardona.  Superelements Modelling in Flexible Multibody Dynamics , 2000 .

[27]  B. D. Veubeke,et al.  The dynamics of flexible bodies , 1976 .

[28]  M. Bampton,et al.  Coupling of substructures for dynamic analyses. , 1968 .

[29]  Yoshiaki Terumichi,et al.  Dynamics of track/wheel systems on high-speed vehicles , 2005 .

[30]  Thomas Abrahamsson,et al.  Simulation of Interaction Between a Train in General Motion and a Track , 2002 .

[31]  Olivier A. Bauchau,et al.  Flexible multibody dynamics , 2010 .

[32]  Peter Eberhard,et al.  DYNAMIC ANALYSIS OF FLEXIBLE MANIPULATORS, A LITERATURE REVIEW , 2006 .

[33]  Lu Sun.  Dynamic displacement response of beam-type structures to moving line loads , 2001 .

[34]  Anders Johansson,et al.  Out-of-round railway wheels—a study of wheel polygonalization through simulation of three-dimensional wheel–rail interaction and wear , 2005 .

[35]  Rao V. Dukkipati,et al.  Impact Loads due to Wheel Flats and Shells , 1999 .

[36]  Karl Popp,et al.  Vehicle-Track Dynamics in the Mid-Frequency Range , 1999 .

[37]  Jorge Ambrósio,et al.  Application of a wheel–rail contact model to railway dynamics in small radius curved tracks , 2008 .

[38]  Krzysztof Wilde,et al.  Application of continuous wavelet transform in vibration based damage detection method for beams and plates , 2006 .

[39]  S. Dietz,et al.  Interaction of Vehicles and Flexible Tracks by Co-Simulation of Multibody Vehicle Systems and Finite Element Track Models , 2002 .

[40]  Ahmed A. Shabana,et al.  Dynamics of Multibody Systems , 2020 .