Contextuality-by-Default Description of Bell Tests: Contextuality as the Rule and Not as an Exception
暂无分享,去创建一个
[1] D. Aerts,et al. Quantum entanglement in physical and cognitive systems: A conceptual analysis and a general representation , 2019, The European Physical Journal Plus.
[2] A. Zeilinger,et al. Experimental non-classicality of an indivisible quantum system , 2011, Nature.
[3] R. Raussendorf. Quantum computation, discreteness, and contextuality , 2009 .
[4] Jan-AAke Larsson,et al. Loopholes in Bell inequality tests of local realism , 2014, 1407.0363.
[5] A. Winter. What does an experimental test of quantum contextuality prove or disprove? , 2014, 1408.0945.
[6] S. Miyashita,et al. Event-by-event simulation of quantum phenomena : Application to Einstein-Podolosky-Rosen-Bohm experiments , 2007, 0712.3781.
[7] N. Mermin. Hidden variables and the two theorems of John Bell , 1993, 1802.10119.
[8] Andrei Khrennikov. Two Faced Janus of Quantum Nonlocality , 2020, Entropy.
[9] G. Roger,et al. Experimental Test of Bell's Inequalities Using Time- Varying Analyzers , 1982 .
[10] Aldo Solís,et al. Advanced Statistical Testing of Quantum Random Number Generators , 2018, Entropy.
[11] Albert Einstein,et al. Physics and reality , 1936 .
[12] A. Cabello. Experimentally testable state-independent quantum contextuality. , 2008, Physical review letters.
[13] Ehtibar N. Dzhafarov,et al. Contents, Contexts, and Basics of Contextuality , 2021, 2103.07954.
[14] Marek Czachor,et al. On some class of random variables leading to violations of the Bell inequality , 1988 .
[15] Karl Hess,et al. Hidden assumptions in the derivation of the theorem of Bell , 2011, 1108.3583.
[16] A. Shimony,et al. Proposed Experiment to Test Local Hidden Variable Theories. , 1969 .
[17] N. David Mermin,et al. Boojums All The Way Through , 1990 .
[18] Ehtibar N. Dzhafarov,et al. Snow Queen Is Evil and Beautiful: Experimental Evidence for Probabilistic Contextuality in Human Choices , 2017, Decision.
[19] J. Bell. On the Problem of Hidden Variables in Quantum Mechanics , 1966 .
[20] Travis Norsen,et al. Bell's theorem , 2011, Scholarpedia.
[21] Armin W. Schulz,et al. Interpretations of probability , 2003 .
[22] Marco T'ulio Quintino,et al. All noncontextuality inequalities for the n-cycle scenario , 2012, 1206.3212.
[23] A. Cabello,et al. Bell-Kochen-Specker theorem: A proof with 18 vectors , 1996, quant-ph/9706009.
[24] A. Khrennikov. Can There be Given Any Meaning to Contextuality Without Incompatibility? , 2020, International Journal of Theoretical Physics.
[25] Robert W. Spekkens,et al. Foundations of Quantum Mechanics , 2007 .
[26] M. Kupczynski,et al. Entanglement and Bell Inequalities , 2004 .
[27] R. Spekkens. Contextuality for preparations, transformations, and unsharp measurements , 2004, quant-ph/0406166.
[28] H. De Raedt,et al. Einstein-Podolsky-Rosen-Bohm laboratory experiments: Data analysis and simulation , 2011, 1112.2629.
[29] C. H. Oh,et al. State-independent proof of Kochen-Specker theorem with 13 rays. , 2011, Physical review letters.
[30] Ehtibar N. Dzhafarov,et al. On joint distributions, counterfactual values and hidden variables in understanding contextuality , 2018, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society A.
[31] The BIG Bell Test Collaboration,et al. Challenging local realism with human choices , 2018 .
[32] Cristian S. Calude,et al. Experimental Evidence of Quantum Randomness Incomputability , 2010, ArXiv.
[33] M. Kupczynski. Quantum mechanics and modeling of physical reality , 2018, Physica Scripta.
[34] J. Bell,et al. The Theory of Local Beables , 1975 .
[35] Marian Kupczynski,et al. Is Einsteinian no-signalling violated in Bell tests? , 2017, 1709.00708.
[36] J. Kujala,et al. Measures of contextuality and non-contextuality , 2019, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society A.
[37] Aaron J. Miller,et al. Detection-loophole-free test of quantum nonlocality, and applications. , 2013, Physical review letters.
[38] Victor Veitch,et al. Contextuality supplies the ‘magic’ for quantum computation , 2014, Nature.
[39] Marian Kupczynski,et al. EPR paradox, quantum nonlocality and physical reality , 2016, 1602.02959.
[40] Luigi Accardi,et al. Some loopholes to save quantum nonlocality , 2005 .
[41] A. Bednorz. Analysis of assumptions of recent tests of local realism , 2015, 1511.03509.
[42] A. Peres. Unperformed experiments have no results , 1978 .
[43] S. Boughn,et al. Making Sense of Bell’s Theorem and Quantum Nonlocality , 2017, 1703.11003.
[44] E. Knill,et al. A strong loophole-free test of local realism , 2015, 2016 Conference on Lasers and Electro-Optics (CLEO).
[45] Arkady Plotnitsky,et al. Niels Bohr and Complementarity: An Introduction , 2012 .
[46] M. Kupczynski. Entanglement and quantum nonlocality demystified , 2012, 1205.4636.
[47] E. Pothos,et al. Violations of locality and free choice are equivalent resources in Bell experiments , 2021, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.
[48] M. Czachor. Arithmetic Loophole in Bell's Theorem: Overlooked Threat to Entangled-State Quantum Cryptography , 2020 .
[49] Andrei Khrennikov,et al. True contextuality beats direct influences in human decision making. , 2018, Journal of experimental psychology. General.
[50] Karl Hess,et al. Extended Boole-Bell inequalities applicable to quantum theory , 2009, 0901.2546.
[51] Marian Kupczynski. On operational approach to entanglement and how to certify it , 2016 .
[52] Kurt Jung,et al. Violation of Bell’s inequality: Must the Einstein locality really be abandoned? , 2017 .
[53] H. Weinfurter,et al. Violation of Bell's Inequality under Strict Einstein Locality Conditions , 1998, quant-ph/9810080.
[54] S. Miyashita,et al. Event-Based Computer Simulation Model of Aspect-Type Experiments Strictly Satisfying Einstein's Locality Conditions , 2007, 0712.2565.
[55] Arthur Fine,et al. Joint distributions, quantum correlations, and commuting observables , 1982 .
[56] H. De Raedt,et al. Data analysis of Einstein-Podolsky-Rosen-Bohm laboratory experiments , 2013, Optics & Photonics - Optical Engineering + Applications.
[57] Guillaume Adenier,et al. Test of the no‐signaling principle in the Hensen loophole‐free CHSH experiment , 2016, 1606.00784.
[58] Karl Svozil,et al. Quantum Hocus Pocus , 2016, 1605.08569.
[59] A Zeilinger,et al. Hidden-variable theorems for real experiments. , 2001, Physical review letters.
[60] Ehtibar N. Dzhafarov,et al. True contextuality in a psychophysical experiment , 2018, Journal of Mathematical Psychology.
[61] M. Kupczyński,et al. Tests for the purity of the initial ensemble of states in scattering experiments , 1974 .
[62] Ana María Cetto,et al. On the Spin Projection Operator and the Probabilistic Meaning of the Bipartite Correlation Function , 2019 .
[63] K. Hess. Bell’s Theorem and Instantaneous Influences at a Distance , 2018, 1805.04797.
[64] Dirk Aerts,et al. A possible explanation for the probabilities of quantum mechanics , 1986 .
[65] K. Svozil. Quantum Violation of the Suppes-Zanotti Inequalities and “Contextuality” , 2021, International Journal of Theoretical Physics.
[66] Andrei Khrennikov,et al. Get Rid of Nonlocality from Quantum Physics , 2019, Entropy.
[67] Samson Abramsky,et al. The sheaf-theoretic structure of non-locality and contextuality , 2011, 1102.0264.
[68] Emanuel Knill,et al. Asymptotically optimal data analysis for rejecting local realism , 2011 .
[69] Marian Kupczynski,et al. Is quantum theory predictably complete? , 2008, 0810.1259.
[70] M. A. Can,et al. Simple test for hidden variables in spin-1 systems. , 2007, Physical review letters.
[71] T. Nieuwenhuizen,et al. Is the Contextuality Loophole Fatal for the Derivation of Bell Inequalities? , 2011 .
[72] Andrei Khrennikov,et al. Ubiquitous Quantum Structure , 2010 .
[73] E. T. Jaynes,et al. Clearing up Mysteries — The Original Goal , 1989 .
[74] Jean-Daniel Bancal,et al. Device-independent Point Estimation from Finite Data , 2017, 1705.09245.
[75] A. Fine. Hidden Variables, Joint Probability, and the Bell Inequalities , 1982 .
[76] Marian Kupczynski,et al. Closing the Door on Quantum Nonlocality , 2018, Entropy.
[77] T. Nieuwenhuizen,et al. Where Bell went wrong , 2008, 0812.3058.
[78] Caroline H. Thompson,et al. The chaotic ball: An intuitive analogy for EPR experiments , 1996, quant-ph/9611037.
[79] Marian Kupczynski,et al. The Contextuality Loophole is Fatal for the Derivation of Bell Inequalities: Reply to a Comment by I. Schmelzer , 2016, 1611.05021.
[80] Nicolas Gisin,et al. Exploring the Limits of Quantum Nonlocality with Entangled Photons , 2015, 1506.01649.
[81] T. Fritz,et al. A Combinatorial Approach to Nonlocality and Contextuality , 2012, Communications in Mathematical Physics.
[82] M. Kupczyński,et al. Bertrand's paradox and Bell's inequalities , 1987 .
[83] Ehtibar N. Dzhafarov,et al. Contextuality is about identity of random variables , 2014, 1405.2116.
[84] E. Wigner. On Hidden Variables and Quantum Mechanical Probabilities , 1970 .
[85] Andrei Khrennikov,et al. Quantum Versus Classical Entanglement: Eliminating the Issue of Quantum Nonlocality , 2019, Foundations of Physics.
[86] Ana María Cetto,et al. On hidden-variable theories and Bell's inequality , 1972 .
[87] A. Winter,et al. Graph-theoretic approach to quantum correlations. , 2014, Physical review letters.
[88] W. M. de Muynck,et al. Interpretations of quantum mechanics, joint measurement of incompatible observables, and counterfactual definiteness , 1994 .
[89] J. S. BELLt. Einstein-Podolsky-Rosen Paradox , 2018 .
[90] Marian Kupczynski. Significance tests and sample homogeneity loophole , 2015 .
[91] Rui Soares Barbosa,et al. Contextual Fraction as a Measure of Contextuality. , 2017, Physical review letters.
[92] I. Pitowsky,et al. George Boole's ‘Conditions of Possible Experience’ and the Quantum Puzzle , 1994, The British Journal for the Philosophy of Science.
[93] A. Shimony,et al. Bell’s theorem without inequalities , 1990 .
[94] Karl Hess,et al. From Boole to Leggett-Garg: Epistemology of Bell-Type Inequalities , 2016, 1605.04887.
[95] Patrick Suppes,et al. When are probabilistic explanations possible? , 2005, Synthese.
[96] K. Jung. Polarization Correlation of Entangled Photons Derived Without Using Non-local Interactions , 2020, Frontiers in Physics.
[97] M. Kupczyński,et al. Pitovsky model and complementarity , 1987 .
[98] Marian Kupczynski. EPR Paradox, Locality and Completeness of Quantum Theory , 2007 .
[99] Marian Kupczynski. Bell Inequalities, Experimental Protocols and Contextuality , 2014 .
[100] Marian Kupczynski,et al. Breakdown of statistical inference from some random experiments , 2016, Comput. Phys. Commun..
[101] S. Wehner,et al. Loophole-free Bell inequality violation using electron spins separated by 1.3 kilometres , 2015, Nature.
[102] A. Cabello. Simple explanation of the quantum violation of a fundamental inequality. , 2012, Physical review letters.
[103] Andrei Khrennikov. Bohr against Bell: complementarity versus nonlocality , 2017 .
[104] Marian Kupczynski,et al. Causality and local determinism versus quantum nonlocality , 2013, 1312.0636.
[105] Garg,et al. Quantum mechanics versus macroscopic realism: Is the flux there when nobody looks? , 1985, Physical review letters.
[106] Andrei Khrennikov,et al. CHSH Inequality: Quantum Probabilities as Classical Conditional Probabilities , 2014, 1406.4886.
[107] Marian Kupczynski,et al. Can we close the Bohr–Einstein quantum debate? , 2016, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences.
[108] Karl Hess,et al. Bell’s theorem: Critique of proofs with and without inequalities , 2005 .
[109] M. Kupczynski. A comment on: the violations of locality and free choice are equivalent resources in Bell experiments , 2021, 2105.14279.
[110] A. Zeilinger,et al. Significant-Loophole-Free Test of Bell's Theorem with Entangled Photons. , 2015, Physical review letters.
[111] Marian Kupczynski. Seventy Years of the EPR Paradox , 2006 .
[112] Marian Kupczynski. Time Series, Stochastic Processes and Completeness of Quantum Theory , 2011 .
[114] Jan-Åke Larsson,et al. Necessary and Sufficient Conditions for an Extended Noncontextuality in a Broad Class of Quantum Mechanical Systems. , 2014, Physical review letters.
[115] L. Accardi. Topics in quantum probability , 1981 .
[116] Guillaume Adenier,et al. Is the fair sampling assumption supported by EPR experiments , 2007 .
[117] K. Michielsen,et al. The photon identification loophole in EPRB experiments: computer models with single-wing selection , 2017, 1707.08307.
[118] P. Pearle. Hidden-Variable Example Based upon Data Rejection , 1970 .
[119] Yeong-Cherng Liang,et al. Bounding the Plausibility of Physical Theories in a Device-Independent Setting via Hypothesis Testing , 2018, Entropy.
[120] Andrei Khrennikov,et al. Bell-Boole Inequality: Nonlocality or Probabilistic Incompatibility of Random Variables? , 2008, Entropy.
[121] Andrei Khrennikov,et al. Contextual Approach to Quantum Formalism , 2009 .
[122] Marek Zukowski,et al. Quantum non-locality—it ainʼt necessarily so... , 2014, 1501.04618.
[123] Kristel Michielsen,et al. Event-by-Event Simulation of Einstein-Podolsky-Rosen-Bohm Experiments , 2007, 0712.3693.
[124] A E Bostwick,et al. THE THEORY OF PROBABILITIES. , 1896, Science.
[125] R. Messi,et al. Bell-type polarization experiment with pairs of uncorrelated optical photons , 2020, 2002.02723.
[126] M. Kupczyński,et al. On some new tests of completeness of quantum mechanics , 1986 .
[127] E. T. Jaynesz,et al. Clearing up Mysteries { the Original Goal , 1989 .
[128] Jan-AAke Larsson,et al. Contextuality in Three Types of Quantum-Mechanical Systems , 2014, 1411.2244.
[129] A. Zeilinger,et al. Speakable and Unspeakable in Quantum Mechanics , 1989 .